信息化与工业化融合的耦合程度和增值能力

发布时间：2018-05-24 04:27

  本文选题：信息化与工业化融合 + 耦合程度　； 参考：《社会科学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：两化融合并不是单一维度上的变量,而是具有"方向(耦合程度)"和"大小(增值能力)"的矢量特征,并且信息化和工业化也是具有矢量特征的。研究发现,2000-2014年中国信息化与工业化融合的耦合程度和增值能力不断提升,耦合程度已达到一个较高水平,且增值能力提升更多的是依靠信息化、工业化的带动;但各省市区增值能力的差异性远大于耦合程度的差异性,其区域发展本身的差异性应是重要原因;东部地区耦合程度和增值能力均处于最高水平,中部地区耦合程度低于西部地区,但是增值能力高于西部地区;从两化融合增值能力的动态分解看,工业化、信息化增长所带来的增值效果大于耦合程度提升带来的增值效果,两化融合静态增值能力(Ⅰ型增值能力)和两化融合横向增值能力(Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型增值能力)均表现为东部地区最大、中部地区次之,西部地区最小的特征,两化融合纵向增值能力(Ⅳ型、Ⅴ型、Ⅵ型增值能力)却呈现中部地区最高,东部和西部地区处于同一水平的态势。未来政策导向应突破静态耦合程度的束缚,全面认识两化融合的双重性质,辩证地看待两化融合和信息化、工业化之间的关系,根据各地区发展状况制定具有针对性的政策体系。
[Abstract]:The fusion is not a single dimension variable, but a vector characteristic of "direction (coupling degree)" and "size (value-added ability)", and information and industrialization also have vector characteristics. It is found that the coupling degree and value-added capability of China's integration of informatization and industrialization from 2000 to 2014 are increasing, and the coupling degree has reached a higher level, and the promotion of value-added capability is more dependent on information technology and industrialization. However, the difference of the value added ability of the provinces and cities is far greater than the difference of the coupling degree, the difference of the regional development itself should be the important reason, the coupling degree and the value added ability of the eastern region are both in the highest level. The coupling degree of the central region is lower than that of the western region, but the value-added capability is higher than that of the western region. The static value-added capability (type 鈪，

本文编号：1927681