国民幸福度量方法比较与应用研究
发布时间:2018-07-14 16:38
【摘要】:幸福感是主观心理体验,早期心理学主要是从个体出发研究幸福感即个体幸福感,伦理学、社会学等领域的研究对象同样以个体主观幸福感为主。统计学则是从总体的、综合的角度探讨幸福感,即总体幸福感。这可通过构建主、客观指标体系来反映,最终通过国民幸福指数来度量。 近些年,国民幸福问题已成研究热点,学者、国家组织、调查机构纷纷发布了名目繁多的各类“幸福”排名,这些研究“排名”多以“国民幸福指数”为序。但是,,这些“幸福”排名缺乏可比性,有些排名相互矛盾甚至“打架”。这说明总体国民幸福研究不是一个简单的计算“指数”问题,而是需要从统计理论和方法上进行认真探讨的问题。因此,本文以逻辑和递进的方式从以下方面进行比较研究:一是个体幸福感数据收集方法的比较研究;二是总体国民幸福感的指标和计算方法的比较研究;三是对总体幸福感影响因素的深度挖掘研究,指出对国民幸福问题的深度研究要立足在对指数背后的诸影响因素的解析。本文研究的特色和工作贡献主要体现在后两个方面,体现在对总体国民幸福感测度方法的比较和择优。 本文追溯了国民幸福研究进程,对中国国民幸福统计阶段进行了断代研究。实证方面是以广州市城镇居民作为调查对象,重点利用择优后较为理想和可行的度量方法对国民幸福问题进行探讨,旨在为国民幸福研究提供更具操作性和可行性的度量方法及研究路径,为政府和机构决策提供真实可信的信息,为衡量宏观经济的可持续发展及幸福国家和谐社会建设进程提供切实可靠的研究手段。
[Abstract]:Well-being is a subjective psychological experience. In early psychology, the main research objects in the fields of individual well-being, ethics, sociology and so on are the individual subjective well-being. Statistics is from the overall, comprehensive point of view of well-being, that is, overall well-being. This can be reflected by constructing subjective and objective index system and finally measured by national happiness index. In recent years, the issue of national happiness has become a hot issue, scholars, national organizations, research institutions have published a variety of "happiness" rankings, these "rankings" mostly in the order of "national happiness index". However, these "happiness" rankings are not comparable, some are contradictory or even "fight." This shows that the study of overall national happiness is not a simple calculation of the "index" problem, but a problem that needs to be seriously explored from the statistical theory and method. Therefore, this article carries on the comparative research from the following aspects by the logic and the progressive way: first, the individual well-being data collection method comparison research, the second is the overall national well-being index and the computation method comparison research; The third is the deep research on the influencing factors of the overall well-being, pointing out that the deep research on the national happiness should be based on the analysis of the influencing factors behind the index. The characteristics and contribution of this paper are mainly reflected in the latter two aspects, and the comparison and selection of the measurement methods of the overall national well-being. This paper traces the process of national happiness research and studies the statistical stage of national happiness in China. In the empirical aspect, taking the urban residents of Guangzhou as the object of investigation, the author mainly discusses the problem of national happiness by using the more ideal and feasible measurement method after the selection of the best. It aims to provide a more operational and feasible measurement method and research path for national happiness research, and to provide true and credible information for government and institutional decision-making. To measure the sustainable development of macroeconomic and the process of building a happy country harmonious society to provide a practical and reliable means of research.
【学位授予单位】:广东商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F126;F224
本文编号:2122264
[Abstract]:Well-being is a subjective psychological experience. In early psychology, the main research objects in the fields of individual well-being, ethics, sociology and so on are the individual subjective well-being. Statistics is from the overall, comprehensive point of view of well-being, that is, overall well-being. This can be reflected by constructing subjective and objective index system and finally measured by national happiness index. In recent years, the issue of national happiness has become a hot issue, scholars, national organizations, research institutions have published a variety of "happiness" rankings, these "rankings" mostly in the order of "national happiness index". However, these "happiness" rankings are not comparable, some are contradictory or even "fight." This shows that the study of overall national happiness is not a simple calculation of the "index" problem, but a problem that needs to be seriously explored from the statistical theory and method. Therefore, this article carries on the comparative research from the following aspects by the logic and the progressive way: first, the individual well-being data collection method comparison research, the second is the overall national well-being index and the computation method comparison research; The third is the deep research on the influencing factors of the overall well-being, pointing out that the deep research on the national happiness should be based on the analysis of the influencing factors behind the index. The characteristics and contribution of this paper are mainly reflected in the latter two aspects, and the comparison and selection of the measurement methods of the overall national well-being. This paper traces the process of national happiness research and studies the statistical stage of national happiness in China. In the empirical aspect, taking the urban residents of Guangzhou as the object of investigation, the author mainly discusses the problem of national happiness by using the more ideal and feasible measurement method after the selection of the best. It aims to provide a more operational and feasible measurement method and research path for national happiness research, and to provide true and credible information for government and institutional decision-making. To measure the sustainable development of macroeconomic and the process of building a happy country harmonious society to provide a practical and reliable means of research.
【学位授予单位】:广东商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F126;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈惠雄;吴丽民;;国民快乐指数调查量表设计的理论机理、结构与测量学特性分析[J];财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报);2006年05期
2 吉楠;李幼穗;;《大学生主观幸福感量表》的编制[J];心理与行为研究;2006年01期
3 林洪;李玉萍;;国民幸福总值(GNH)的启示与国民幸福研究[J];当代财经;2007年05期
4 王慧红;陈楠;;中国幸福指数的构建[J];商业经济与管理;2008年06期
5 杨作毅;;北京居民幸福指数的调查与分析[J];统计与决策;2008年05期
6 张会平;;基于HP滤波视角的国民幸福指数的波动分析[J];统计与决策;2012年04期
7 何跃;王猛;;基于灰色关联与Ward系统聚类的国民幸福评价[J];统计与决策;2012年05期
8 庄连平;李晶;;基于相关性分析的广义国民幸福指数的构建[J];统计教育;2008年08期
9 钟永豪,林洪,任晓阳;国民幸福指标体系设计[J];统计与预测;2001年06期
10 林洪;孙求华;;中国国民幸福统计研究十年简史[J];统计研究;2013年01期
本文编号:2122264
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2122264.html