消解“悖论”的预设知识——语义、自涉、矛盾、内容

发布时间：2018-03-11 13:43

本文选题：语义　切入点：价值　出处：《社会科学辑刊》2002年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从来没有人认为真语句 ( P)缺乏语义。按逻辑 ,“非 P”也有语义 ;重言句“P或非P”和矛盾句“P且非 P”也有语义 ;由“自涉”产生的隐蔽矛盾“言尽悖”( Q)也有语义。古哲们从未指 Q缺乏语义以回避矛盾。当然 ,我们可以从 Q本身有无价值 (意义 ) ,说 Q者有无意图、目的 (意义 )等方面来审查它。由于 2 0 0 0多年来“强化谎者”论题未能被消解 ,人们才“特设地”回避、压制或消灭矛盾 ,指它无意义 (大多数论者没有分辨“语义”和“价值”) ,借此消解论题的“矛盾被证”。但是 ,矛盾必有语义 ,矛盾可以保留 ,而悖论性论题犯了“复合命题”谬误。这样就消解了“矛盾被证”,替辩证派和逻辑派评出公道。“意义”也可解作“经验内容”,矛盾句肯定一切事物 ,有太丰富的经验内容 ,自然有语义 ;而重言句虽然有语义 ,但是它空无所指 ,没有肯定任何事物 ,所以没有经验内容
[Abstract]:No one has ever thought that the true sentence (P) lacks semantics. According to logic, "non-P" also has semantic meaning, "P" or "non-P" and "P" and "non-P" also have semantic meaning. Hidden contradictions arising from "self-involvement" (Qs) also have semantics. Ancient philosophers have never pointed out that Q lacks semantics to avoid contradictions. Of course, we can say whether Q has its own value (meaning) and whether the Q has intention or not. Objective (meaning) and other aspects to review it. Since the topic of "enhanced liars" has not been dispelled in the past two thousand years, people have "specifically" avoided, suppressed or eliminated contradictions. It means that it is meaningless (most commentators do not distinguish between "semantics" and "value"), thereby dissolving the topic of "contradiction is proved." however, contradictions must have semantics, contradictions can be preserved, The paradoxical topic commits the fallacy of "compound propositions". In this way, it dispels "contradictions are proved" and evaluates justice for dialectics and logic schools. "meaning" can also be interpreted as "experiential content". Contradictory sentences affirm everything and have too much experience. Of course there is semantics; while heavy sentences have semantics, they have no meaning, no certainty of anything, so there is no content of experience
【作者单位】：深圳市太白路019-03邮箱.广东深圳518019
【分类号】：B812

【参考文献】