二值原则、矛盾与荒谬
发布时间：2018-11-22 10:48
【摘要】：模糊问题是当代英美哲学中的热门话题。认知主义是解决模糊问题的一种重要哲学主张。为了论证认知主义,威廉姆森给出了一个"否认二值原则导致荒谬"的论证。本文的目的就在于反驳威廉姆森的这个论证。本文首先介绍这个论证的三个不同版本;然后,在简单回顾其他学者对这个论证的反驳的基础上,我们将在弗协调逻辑LP中对第二版的论证进行反驳。
[Abstract]:Ambiguity is a hot topic in contemporary British and American philosophy. Cognitivism is an important philosophical proposition to solve fuzzy problems. To demonstrate cognitivism, Williamson presented an argument that denies that the binary principle leads to absurdity. The purpose of this paper is to refute Williamson's argument. This paper first introduces three different versions of this argument, and then, on the basis of a brief review of the rebuttal of this argument by other scholars, we will refute the second version of the argument in LP.
【作者单位】： 辽宁大学哲学与公共管理学院;北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B815.1
本文编号：2349104
[Abstract]:Ambiguity is a hot topic in contemporary British and American philosophy. Cognitivism is an important philosophical proposition to solve fuzzy problems. To demonstrate cognitivism, Williamson presented an argument that denies that the binary principle leads to absurdity. The purpose of this paper is to refute Williamson's argument. This paper first introduces three different versions of this argument, and then, on the basis of a brief review of the rebuttal of this argument by other scholars, we will refute the second version of the argument in LP.
【作者单位】： 辽宁大学哲学与公共管理学院;北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B815.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 尼古拉斯·G.奥努弗;孙吉胜;;建构主义的哲学渊源探析[J];世界经济与政治;2006年09期
，本文编号：2349104
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2349104.html
