亚相容逻辑及其社会功能辨析
发布时间：2018-11-24 18:06
【摘要】：目前学界对亚相容逻「辑社会功能的阐释,主要是将亚相容逻辑所言之"矛盾"与现实的社会矛盾进行直接对应,将系统中A和A的"同真"与现实中的"不予解决"进行简单类比。这混淆了客观矛盾与思维中的矛盾,不利于我们正确把握和探索亚相容逻辑的作用范围和实现机理。要改变这种状况,需要对"矛盾"概念进行辨析,在方法论层面追问接纳矛盾的实质、所接纳矛盾的类型以及亚相容逻辑与经典逻辑在社会功能方面的关系。
[Abstract]:At present, the explanation of the social function of the subcompatible logic mainly refers to the direct correspondence between the contradiction described by the subcompatible logic and the social contradiction in reality. A simple analogy is made between the "same truth" of A and A in the system and the "no solution" in reality. This confuses the objective contradiction with the contradiction in thinking, and is unfavorable for us to correctly grasp and explore the scope of action and realization mechanism of subcompatible logic. In order to change this situation, the concept of "contradiction" should be distinguished and analyzed, and the essence of accepting contradiction, the type of accepted contradiction and the relationship between subcompatible logic and classical logic in social function should be inquired into at the methodological level.
【作者单位】： 电子科技大学马克思主义教育学院;西南财经大学人文学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(15FZX033) 2014年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(ZYGX2014J119)
【分类号】：B811
本文编号：2354532
[Abstract]:At present, the explanation of the social function of the subcompatible logic mainly refers to the direct correspondence between the contradiction described by the subcompatible logic and the social contradiction in reality. A simple analogy is made between the "same truth" of A and A in the system and the "no solution" in reality. This confuses the objective contradiction with the contradiction in thinking, and is unfavorable for us to correctly grasp and explore the scope of action and realization mechanism of subcompatible logic. In order to change this situation, the concept of "contradiction" should be distinguished and analyzed, and the essence of accepting contradiction, the type of accepted contradiction and the relationship between subcompatible logic and classical logic in social function should be inquired into at the methodological level.
【作者单位】： 电子科技大学马克思主义教育学院;西南财经大学人文学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(15FZX033) 2014年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(ZYGX2014J119)
【分类号】：B811
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘叶涛;刘东;;以“逻先生”助推社会理性发展——评王习胜、张建军《逻辑的社会功能》[J];社会科学论坛;2013年09期
，本文编号：2354532
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2354532.html
