行政指导行为性质及可诉性研究
本文关键词:行政指导行为性质及可诉性研究 出处:《吉林大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:行政指导行为是我国行政民主化进程中在行政管理领域被不断提及的一种现代政府管理方式,也是非强制行政行为中最为重要的一个概念。近些年来,随着我国政府由管理型向服务型的转变,服务型政府的相关概念也得到越来越多的关注,但从现今的实际情况看来,行政指导行为恰恰就处在一个现实意义重大、理论基础薄弱、实务问题甚多的一个较为尴尬的地位。因此,明确行政指导的正确定位及其可诉性,使得政府在行使相关服务职能、进行相关行政指导的过程中有规则可用、有制度可遵;社会在接受政府行为、并对政府行为做出反馈的过程中有法可依、有律可循,并且在权益受到政府非强制性指导行为侵害时可以借助法律诉讼来维护自己的权益显得势在必行。 行政法领域的非强制性行政行为,尤其是行政指导,是政府职能转变中的首要问题,这是我国的法制化进程不断发展、法治水平不断提高的必然趋势。在我国民主法治潮流大势的驱动下,代表公权力的国家行政行为和以契约关系为纽带的人与人关系总和的社会公共利益的协调问题是公法领域和私法领域都无法回避的一个重大问题,尤其是二者之间的关系问题,对占据优势地位的公权力对应的公法领域的研究更是一种无法回避的义务。由此,作为能够较好平衡公权力与私权利的行政指导行为的明确定位以及因受到与行政指导行为相关的影响而遭到的利益侵害情况下,能得到法律诉讼保护在行政领域中就凸显出了重要性。 实践中,我国行政指导定位的不清晰以及因行政指导行为而产生的利益遭受侵害的情况并未被纳入到行政诉讼的可诉范围,对我国的公权力限制以及对相对人的保护显得缺失严重,,不利于我国行政领域的法制建设,而对上述的问题研究就显得尤为重要。 本文在较为细致的介绍国内外行政指导行为相关理论及实务现状的基础上,通过文献研究法,社会实证研究方法,比较分析的方法,得出行政指导行为作为典型的非强制性行为的权力属性和事实行为到法律行为的阶段延续性的性质定位,以及行政指导行为可以纳入行政诉讼范围的必要性以及可行性。藉此,能够使理论界对行政指导行为定位的统一和实务界对行政指导行为损害纳入诉讼救济的进程能起到一定的总结和铺垫作用。
[Abstract]:The administrative guidance behavior is a kind of modern government management mode which is constantly mentioned in the administrative field in the process of administrative democratization in our country. It is also the most important concept in the non-compulsory administrative behavior. In recent years. With the change of our government from management to service, more and more attention has been paid to the concept of service-oriented government. The behavior of administrative guidance is in an awkward position with great practical significance, weak theoretical foundation and many practical problems. Therefore, it is clear that the correct orientation of administrative guidance and its actionable nature. Make the government in the exercise of relevant service functions, the process of relevant administrative guidance has rules available, there are systems to comply with; The society has laws to follow and rules to follow in the process of accepting government behavior and making feedback to government behavior. Moreover, it is imperative to protect their rights and interests through legal proceedings when the rights and interests are infringed by the government. Non-compulsory administrative behavior in the field of administrative law, especially administrative guidance, is the primary issue in the transformation of government functions, which is the continuous development of the process of legalization in our country. The inevitable trend of improving the level of rule of law is driven by the trend of democracy and rule of law in our country. The coordination of the public interests between the state administrative acts representing the public power and the relationship between the people and the people is an unavoidable problem in the field of public law and private law. In particular, the relationship between the two issues, the dominant position of the public power corresponding to the field of public law research is an unavoidable obligation. As a better balance between public power and private rights of the administrative guidance of the clear positioning of the behavior and because of the impact of administrative guidance behavior suffered by the interests of the situation. It is very important to be protected by legal proceedings in the field of administration. In practice, the unclear orientation of our administrative guidance and the infringement of the interests arising from the administrative guidance actions have not been included in the scope of administrative litigation. The limitation of the public power and the protection of the relative person are seriously lacking, which is not conducive to the construction of the legal system in the administrative field of our country, and the study of the above problems is particularly important. On the basis of the detailed introduction of the theory and practice of administrative guidance behavior at home and abroad, this paper makes a comparative analysis through the methods of literature research, social empirical research and comparative analysis. The author draws the conclusion that the administrative guidance act is the power attribute of the typical non-compulsory act and the nature of the continuity from the factual act to the legal act. And the necessity and feasibility of administrative guidance behavior can be brought into the scope of administrative litigation. It can make the theory circle unify the orientation of the administrative guidance act and the practice circle can sum up and pave the way for the harm of the administrative guidance act to be brought into the process of litigation relief.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高军;谢忠宝;;非强制行政行为的法治化思考[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
2 莫于川,林鸿潮;论当代行政法上的信赖保护原则[J];法商研究;2004年05期
3 张树义;论行政指导[J];工商行政管理;2002年20期
4 根岸哲;鲍荣振;;日本的产业政策与行政指导[J];环球法律评论;1992年01期
5 莫于川;法治视野中的行政指导行为——论我国行政指导的合法性问题与法治化路径[J];现代法学;2004年03期
6 莫于川;国外行政指导典型案例研究[J];行政法学研究;2003年03期
7 车美玉;韩国行政程序法(1996年)[J];行政法学研究;1997年03期
8 崔卓兰,孙红梅;非强制行政行为初探[J];行政与法;1998年03期
9 方宁,朱进;行政指导可诉性探析[J];行政与法;2003年04期
10 罗豪才;袁曙宏;李文栋;;现代行政法的理论基础——论行政机关与相对一方的权利义务平衡[J];中国法学;1993年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李晓明;非强制行政的法理学思考[D];吉林大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 吴晓晴;柔性管理视角下行政指导研究[D];上海师范大学;2011年
2 李莎莎;论行政指导的可诉性[D];广西民族大学;2011年
3 梁蓉;论加强和改善我国的行政指导[D];华中师范大学;2007年
4 冯宝珍;行政指导法律救济论[D];安徽大学;2007年
本文编号:1355989
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/1355989.html