流域协同治理的主体动力研究

发布时间：2018-01-11 16:11

本文关键词：流域协同治理的主体动力研究　出处：《湘潭大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着“推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化”这一全面深化改革总目标的提出,积极探索适合中国国情的新型社会治理模式刻不容缓。水资源短缺和流域水污染是我国面临的重要环境问题,流域治理一直是学界关注的重点课题。流域协同治理能有效解决行政区域分割导致的流域分段式管理模式下用水和排污矛盾。当前形势下,政府是流域协同治理的主导力量,受中央政策导向牵引,在地区竞争加剧的背景下,以行政转型与治理变革为契机,以理论创新和信息技术进步为支撑,快步加入协同治理的行列;企业是流域协同治理的中坚力量,抓住政府失灵与改革放权的先机,有强大的资金与技术网作为支撑;第三部门则在民主政治的强大呼声中,受到参与公共治理这一目标与使命的牵引,成为流域协同治理中不可忽视的新兴力量。然而,协同治理尚未呈现完美的制度设计,流域治理各主体均存在动力缺失现象,有待理性反思。政府方面,信任危机、地区保护主义、不合理的政绩观与考核体系给流域协同治理带来考验;企业方面,其天生的逐利性与协同治理公共性产生冲突,管理体制与组织文化的局囿也导致协同治理困局;第三部门则深受政府管制,资金来源不足、专业水平差,社会监督缺乏导致的信息不透明也削减了其参与流域协同治理的动力。针对流域治理主体动力缺失问题,在对其成因进行深入剖析的基础上提出动力激发与维护的具体措施:要提升中央政府的全局调控能力、厘清政府间利益纠葛、完善政绩考核与官员晋升体系,切实优化地方政府合作体系;要增进公共部门民营化改革,培育政企良好的合作形式,夯实政企合作基础;要明晰政社职能边界,拓展政社合作领域,深化政社合作内容;还要通过创新主体培育机制、文化心理认同机制、法制保障机制等来强化流域协同治理合力。
[Abstract]:With the overall goal of "promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity", the overall goal of deepening the reform has been put forward. It is urgent to explore a new mode of social governance suitable for China's national conditions. Water shortage and river basin water pollution are important environmental problems facing our country. Watershed management has been the focus of academic attention. Watershed collaborative management can effectively solve the conflict between water and sewage caused by administrative division of the watershed management mode. Under the current situation. The government is the leading force of watershed coordinated governance, guided by central policy, under the background of intensified regional competition, administrative transformation and governance reform as an opportunity, theoretical innovation and information technology progress as the support. Quick step into the ranks of cooperative governance; Enterprises are the backbone of river basin coordinated management, seize the first opportunity of government failure and reform decentralization, have strong funds and technical network as the support; The third sector is driven by the goal and mission of participating in public governance in the strong voice of democratic politics and has become a new force which can not be ignored in the collaborative management of river basin. Coordinated governance has not yet presented a perfect system design, the main body of river basin governance has the phenomenon of lack of power, need to be rational reflection. Government, trust crisis, regional protectionism. Unreasonable political achievement view and appraisal system bring the test to the river basin coordinated management; In the aspect of enterprises, the inherent pursuit of profit and the publicity of cooperative governance have conflicts, and the management system and organizational culture also lead to the difficulties of collaborative governance. The third sector is heavily regulated by the government, with insufficient sources of funds and poor professional standards. The lack of information transparency caused by the lack of social supervision also reduces its participation in collaborative watershed governance. On the basis of in-depth analysis of its causes, this paper puts forward specific measures to stimulate and maintain the motive force: to enhance the overall control ability of the central government, to clarify the inter-governmental interests disputes, and to improve the system of performance assessment and promotion of officials. To optimize the cooperation system of local government; It is necessary to promote the privatization reform of the public sector, cultivate a good form of cooperation between government and enterprises, and consolidate the foundation of cooperation between government and enterprises; It is necessary to clarify the functional boundaries of the political and social cooperation, expand the scope of cooperation and deepen the contents of the cooperation; It is also necessary to strengthen the synergy of watershed management by innovating the cultivation mechanism of the subject, the mechanism of cultural psychological identity, the mechanism of legal guarantee, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】