论我国网络民主监督机制的完善

发布时间：2018-03-03 03:23

本文选题：权利　切入点：利益　出处：《中南民族大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济的发展,人们的生活水平越来越高。当人们在经济上得到满足后,人们开始寻求政治上的权利。网络的兴起在一定程度上反映了民众的权利意识的增强,人们要求有更多知情权和参政、议政的权利,来保护自己的利益不被公权力机关侵犯。网络民主监督顺应民众的需求得到了发展,更重要的是,网络民主监督这种监督途径有其自身的优势,比如其自身具有虚拟性、广泛参与性、理想性、强制性的特点。也由于网络民主监督从根本上来说是公民的表达自由权的一种,是宪法赋予公民的一种权利,这促使网络民主监督能对我国公权力机关的行为进行约束,使其更好的为我国人民服务。但是任何权利都不是不受限制的绝对权利,由于网络民主监督的门槛低,参与范围广,这造成了网民容易滥用自身的权利,对自身监督权限缺乏明确的把握;从而,使网络民主监督容易演变为侵犯公务人员的隐私权,也难于区分政务公开与保守秘密的界限。另外,面对网上真假信息,网上的以讹传讹,网民的道德素质就受到了考验。由于网络民主监督是个新生事物,我国没有一套专门的法典进行规范,也没有程序上的专门立法,其在监督中就容易对国家机关造成负面影响。因此,本人建议从实体上和程序上进行立法来规范网民的行为,并且本人提出了针对网民对公务员的侵权承担侵权责任并进行赔偿,在网络监督中确立网络提供商的法律责任。并从制度上提出建立专门的网上监督机构和监督标准,并从提高公务员素质方面,提出规范网络民主监督。在如何进一步发挥网络民主监督作用的优势方面,本人从增设网民代表、为网络民主监督创造更加便利的制度途径,进一步发挥新闻媒体的舆论监督作用提出了一些自己的看法。本文的创新之处:一是从程序上对网络民主监督进行立法并提出了网民可向专门的政府官方网站申请资格,注册申请时使用实名和有效的身份证件申请话语权等一系列程序,并把这一系列程序用立法的形式确定下来。二是对网民侵犯公务员人格权、身份权进行精神损害赔偿,三是确立网上监督标准中提出证据制度。文章的不足是:一是在选举中增设网民代表,本人认为在理论上在选举中增设网民代表有助于我国网络民主监督作用的发挥,但是在现实中这一制度的实际操作和运用上还需要进一步思考。二是在公务员的隐私权和公民的知情权之间把握上还要进行思考。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, people's living standard is getting higher and higher. When people get satisfied in economy, people begin to seek political rights. People demand more right to know, to participate in politics, to discuss politics, to protect their interests from encroachment by public power organs. Democratic supervision on the Internet has developed to meet the needs of the public, and more importantly, This way of supervision of network democracy has its own advantages, such as its own characteristics of virtual, extensive participation, ideal, and compulsion. Also, because the network democratic supervision is fundamentally a kind of citizen's right to freedom of expression, It is a kind of right granted by the Constitution to citizens, which urges the democratic supervision on the Internet to restrain the behavior of the public power organs in our country and make it better serve the people of our country. But any right is not unlimited absolute right. Because the threshold of network democratic supervision is low and the scope of participation is wide, this causes Internet users to abuse their own rights and lack a clear grasp of their own supervision authority. It is also difficult to distinguish between open and secret government affairs. In addition, in the face of the true and false information on the Internet, the moral quality of Internet users is tested. Since democratic supervision on the Internet is a new thing, Our country does not have a set of special codes to regulate, nor does it have special legislation of procedure, which can easily have a negative impact on state organs in the course of supervision. Therefore, I suggest that legislation should be made from both substantive and procedural aspects to regulate the behavior of Internet users. And I propose to assume tort liability and compensate for the infringement of civil servants by Internet users, establish the legal liability of network provider in network supervision, and put forward the establishment of special online supervision organization and supervision standard from the system. And from the aspect of improving the quality of civil servants, it is proposed to standardize the network democratic supervision. In terms of how to further exert the advantages of the network democratic supervision, I create a more convenient system way for the network democratic supervision by adding the Internet users' representatives. The innovation of this paper is to legislate the network democratic supervision from the procedure and put forward that the Internet users can apply for the qualification to the special government official website. When applying for registration, a series of procedures, such as real names and valid identity documents, are used to apply for the right to speak, and this series of procedures is determined in the form of legislation. Second, compensation for moral damage to Internet users infringing upon the personality rights of civil servants and the right to identity. The third is to establish the evidence system in the online supervision standard. The shortcomings of the article are: first, to increase the number of Internet users' representatives in the election. I think that the addition of Internet surrogate representatives in the election in theory is conducive to the exertion of the role of democratic supervision on the Internet in our country. However, in reality, the actual operation and application of this system still needs further thinking. Second, it is necessary to think about the relationship between the civil servant's right to privacy and the citizen's right to know.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.1

【引证文献】