我国大学生对民主评价的差异分析——以中国、美国、日本、印度为评价对象
发布时间:2018-03-09 02:03
本文选题:大学生 切入点:民主程度评价 出处:《青年研究》2017年05期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:当今社会,各国普遍重视民众对民主的评价。使用"中国青年价值调查"团队的相关数据,并进一步使用"民主评价的中外差异",比较大学生对不同国家民主程度的评价。探索性的回归分析显示,大学生对民主具有一般性的支持,但其对民主的本土化与情景化理解仍深刻影响着其对民主的评价。另外,中国国家治理评价的显著影响表明,随着国家治理能力的提升、治理体系的完善,中国治理式民主将更加得到大学生的认同,并使大学生在面对西方民主时更加具备制度自信。国家荣耀感虽然会显著提升大学生对中国的民主评价,但并未显著降低对美日的评价。这意味着所谓"狭隘的民族主义"至少在本研究看来是站不住脚的。这有力地驳斥了国际民主评价指标所暗含的话语霸权。
[Abstract]:In today's society, countries generally attach importance to people's evaluation of democracy. Use the relevant data from the "China Youth value Survey" team. Furthermore, using "the difference of democratic evaluation between China and foreign countries", the author compares college students' evaluation of democracy degree in different countries. The exploratory regression analysis shows that college students have general support for democracy. However, its understanding of the localization and contextualization of democracy still profoundly affects its evaluation of democracy. In addition, the significant influence of the evaluation of Chinese state governance shows that with the improvement of national governance capacity, the governance system is improved. China's governing democracy will be more recognized by college students and will give them more institutional confidence in the face of western democracy. Although the sense of national glory will significantly enhance college students' evaluation of democracy in China, This means that the so-called "narrow nationalism" is, at least, untenable in this study. This strongly refutes the discourse hegemony implied by international democratic evaluation indicators.
【作者单位】: 南京大学公共事务与地方治理研究中心;南京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重点项目“我国公民政治价值观的实证研究”(16AZZ003)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:D082;D432.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 彼得·罗森道夫,刘光军;透明的提供与民主[J];马克思主义与现实;2004年03期
,本文编号:1586493
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/1586493.html