法治中国进程中独立审判与舆论监督的辩证关系研究

发布时间：2018-03-15 04:11

本文选题：独立审判　切入点：舆论监督　出处：《中国科学技术大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：党的十八大以来,法治中国建设进程稳步推进,成果显著。作为推进民主与法治建设的两大基本元素——独立审判与舆论监督是一对矛盾统一体,既对立又统一。一方面,二者的良性互动对于促进司法公正和实现社会正义具有重要意义;另一方面,二者的消极互动会降低司法权威,有损司法公信,在一定程度上甚至会对个案正义产生不良影响。因此,正确认识独立审判与舆论监督的关系,并在此基础上探索平衡二者关系的具体路径具有重要的理论和现实意义。本文首先对独立审判与舆论监督的相关基本理论问题进行了探讨,梳理和总结了独立审判与舆论监督的渊源和含义等理论问题。其次,对独立审判与舆论监督的辩证关系进行了详实的分析和概括,认为二者的对立性在于运行规律的差别和专业化与非专业化的差别,二者的同一性在于对立蕴含同一、政治保证的同一和终极价值追求的同一等三个方面。随后,本文在对相关数据进行加工整理后以实证分析法概括了独立审判与舆论监督的互动现状,认为当前我国独立审判与舆论监督的互动局面总体上是好的,但是负面影响的存在同"努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中都感受到公平正义"价值理念相悖。关于二者互动出现消极状况的原因,本文认为原因是双方的,但是,主要原因即内因在于独立审判一方。以实证分析为依据,本文坚持马克思主义哲学的矛盾分析法,对平衡二者的辩证关系进行了哲学思考,认为平衡独立审判与舆论监督的辩证关系必须坚持"两点论"和"重点论"相结合。平衡二者辨证关系的基本原则是以提升人民法院独立审判能力为主,以增强舆论监督自律和他律为辅;具体路径包括努力增强人民法院独立审判的责任意识,努力提高人民法院判决说理能力,不断加强审判队伍建设;不断增强舆论自律与舆论监督他律建设。同时,人民法院还必须落实好司法公开,做好对舆论的回应与引导。
[Abstract]:Since the 18 National Congress of the Party, the process of building China under the rule of law has progressed steadily, with remarkable results. As two basic elements in promoting democracy and rule of law, independent trial and public opinion supervision are a pair of contradictory unity, both opposite and unified. The positive interaction between them is of great significance to promote judicial justice and realize social justice, on the other hand, the negative interaction between them will reduce the judicial authority and damage the judicial public trust. To a certain extent, it may even have a negative impact on the justice of individual cases. Therefore, to correctly understand the relationship between independent trial and public opinion supervision, On this basis, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the specific path of balancing the relationship between the two. This paper first discusses the basic theoretical issues related to independent trial and public opinion supervision. Combing and summing up the theoretical problems such as the origin and meaning of independent trial and public opinion supervision. Secondly, the dialectical relationship between independent trial and public opinion supervision is analyzed and summarized in detail. The author thinks that the antagonism of the two lies in the difference of the operation law and the difference between specialization and non-specialization, and the identity of the two lies in three aspects: the contradiction implies the same, the political guarantee is the same and the ultimate value is the same. This paper summarizes the current situation of the interaction between independent trial and public opinion supervision by empirical analysis after processing the relevant data, and thinks that the interactive situation between independent trial and public opinion supervision in China is generally good. However, the existence of negative effects is contrary to the value of "trying to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case." as to the reasons for the negative state of interaction between the two, this paper argues that the reasons are of both sides, but, On the basis of empirical analysis, this paper insists on the contradiction analysis of Marxist philosophy, and makes philosophical thoughts on balancing the dialectical relationship between the two. The author holds that the dialectical relationship between independent trial and public opinion supervision must be combined with "two points theory" and "emphasis theory". The basic principle of balancing the dialectical relationship between them is to enhance the people's court's ability of independent trial. The specific ways include strengthening the sense of responsibility of independent trial of the people's court, improving the judgment reasoning ability of the people's court, and strengthening the construction of the judicial team. At the same time, the people's court must carry out the judicial publicity well and make a good response and guidance to the public opinion.
【学位授予单位】：中国科学技术大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】