法治进程中诚信文化建设研究

发布时间：2018-04-09 15:22

本文选题：诚信　切入点：诚信文化　出处：《东北农业大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 五千年的悠久历史铸就了中华民族的灿烂文化,博大精深的文化底蕴中关于诚信的描述更是璨若星海。在经济全球一体化以及多元文化并存的时代,诚信的内涵已经远远超越了传统文化所赋予的意义,在全面进行法治化的今天增添了许多新的内容,同时赋予了诚信新的时代内涵。法治是诚信文化建设的土壤,而诚信文化是法治进程的推动力量,本文将诚信文化建设的研究置于法治化的背景下,通过一系列具体的措施和手段,以及各方面积极有效地配合,形成系统的诚信体系,在法治化的进程中打下诚信的烙印。本文首先分析了传统诚信的起源和发展。原始社会在文字尚未产生以前就萌发了传统的诚信观念,但是并没有形成系统的理论,只是散见在人们的生产活动中。到了文字发明以后,有关诚信的描述逐渐增多,历史轨迹发展到了先秦儒家基本抛弃了迷信的色彩,形成了较为系统的理论,成为文人志士修身自省的准则,只是这时的诚信还主要是以内心的道德义务为本位,还有许多时代局限。随着时代的变迁,传统的诚信观已经无法适应时代的潮流,必须进行现代转型。这样我们就要剔除掉传统诚信中缺陷的部分,把精华的部分继承和发展下来,形成现代的诚信文化理论,更好的为经济建设和法治进程服务。在过去的历史中,封建社会的驱使迫使中国走上了人治的道路,人治几乎成了社会弊病的源头。伴随着新中国的诞生和一系列大政方针的开展,我们最终抛弃了人治选择了法治的道路。历史和实践证明只有法治才能是与现代化的社会状况相适应的治理方式。在全面推行法治化进程的今天,诚信文化的建设尤为重要。诚信文化需要法治作为其外部保障,法治社会也需要诚信文化作为它的内在品质。然而,社会上出现的一些诚信缺失问题只是从表象上进行治理是不彻底的,我们需要剖析失信行为产生的深层原因,其中既有经济上的原因也有文化和制度的因素。本文通过对国外先进征信国家的学习和借鉴,并结合我国自己的国情,考虑到失信行为的产生根源,对我国的诚信文化建设提出了一些自己的看法和观点。
[Abstract]:The long history of five thousand years has cast the splendid culture of the Chinese nation.In the era of global economic integration and the coexistence of multiculturalism, the connotation of honesty and credit has gone far beyond the significance given by traditional culture, and has added many new contents to the overall legalization of the country today.At the same time, it gives a new connotation of honesty and credit.The rule of law is the soil of the construction of the culture of honesty, and the culture of honesty is the driving force of the process of ruling by law. This paper puts the study of the construction of the culture of honesty under the background of the rule of law, and through a series of concrete measures and means,And all aspects actively and effectively cooperate, form a system of integrity, in the process of rule by law to lay the brand of good faith.This paper first analyzes the origin and development of traditional honesty.The primitive society had germinated the traditional concept of honesty before the text was produced, but it did not form a systematic theory, but was scattered in people's production activities.After the invention of characters, the description of honesty and credit gradually increased, and the historical track developed to the pre-Qin Confucianism basically abandoned the color of superstition, formed a more systematic theory, become the literati ideals of self-introspection criteria,But at this time the integrity is mainly based on the moral obligations of the heart, there are many limitations of the times.With the change of the times, the traditional concept of honesty has been unable to adapt to the trend of the times.In this way, we should eliminate the defects of traditional honesty and credit, inherit and develop the essence part, form the modern theory of honesty and credit culture, and better serve the economic construction and the process of ruling by law.In the past, the drive of feudal society forced China to take the road of rule by man, which almost became the source of social ills.With the birth of New China and the development of a series of major policies, we finally abandoned the rule of man and chose the road of rule by law.History and practice have proved that only the rule of law can be adapted to the modern social conditions.In the process of rule by law, the construction of honesty culture is particularly important.The culture of honesty and credit needs the rule of law as its external guarantee and the society of rule of law as its internal quality.However, it is not complete to deal with some problems of honesty and credit in the society only from the appearance. We need to analyze the deep causes of the behavior of dishonesty, among which there are economic reasons as well as cultural and institutional factors.Based on the study and reference of advanced credit reporting countries in foreign countries and the situation of our country, this paper puts forward some views and viewpoints on the construction of honesty and credit culture in our country, taking into account the origin of the behavior of dishonesty.
【学位授予单位】：东北农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D920.0

【引证文献】