在协商与民主之间——协商系统理论对两者张力的调和

发布时间：2018-04-23 04:40

本文选题：协商 + 民主　；参考：《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：协商与民主之间的张力是协商民主理论面临的发展困境,即民主所蕴含的大众参与和协商所要求的小众对话如何统一起来。以往的协商民主理论一般采用代表制对其进行调和,代表制的确通过缩小人数规模而更有助于协商,但其民主性高度依赖于代表对选民的回应性。协商民主的系统转向正是由这种张力所激发的,它关注制度或不同机构之间的依赖与分工,呈现出多元性与分散性的特征。协商系统理论一方面通过包容来诠释民主的内涵,不但包容了多元的协商场域和协商方法,也包容了非协商的机制与因素;另一方面通过关注公众意见向政治代表协商的输入、关注多元的政治代表模式的制度创新来更好地诠释政治代表的回应性。通过这两方面的论证,协商系统理论更好地调和了协商与民主的张力。
[Abstract]:The tension between consultation and democracy is the dilemma that the theory of deliberative democracy faces, that is, how to unify the popular participation and the minority dialogue required by negotiation. The former theory of deliberative democracy generally uses representative system to reconcile it. It is true that representative system is more helpful to negotiation by reducing the number of people, but its democracy is highly dependent on the responsiveness of the representative to the voters. The system turn of deliberative democracy is inspired by this kind of tension. It pays close attention to the dependence and division of labor between institutions or different institutions, showing the characteristics of pluralism and dispersion. On the one hand, the theory of consultation system interprets the connotation of democracy through inclusion, which not only includes the pluralistic consultation field and consultation methods, but also includes the non-consultative mechanism and factors; on the other hand, the theory concerns the input of public opinion to the political representatives' consultation. Pay attention to the system innovation of pluralistic political representation model to better explain the responsiveness of political representatives. Through these two aspects of argumentation, the theory of negotiation system can better reconcile the tension between negotiation and democracy.
【作者单位】：中国海洋大学法政学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FZZ009);国家社科基金一般项目(15BZZ014) 青岛市哲学社会科学规划项目(QDSKL1601024)
【分类号】：D621

【相似文献】