习惯法在当代中国法制进程中的角色扮演

发布时间：2018-04-26 17:46

本文选题：习惯法 + 制定法　；参考：《北方工业大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：为了对习惯法的概念作出科学的界定,并明确习惯法在当代中国法制进程中的作用,本文以马克思主义唯物辩证法指导,同时运用历史分析的方法、比较的方法、理论与实证相结合的方法,对习惯法的生成、演进、习惯法的法源地位、习惯法和国家法的关系、习惯法在当代中国法制进程中的作用进行了科学的研究。目前国内学者对习惯法概念的界定可以说是仁者见仁,智者见智,大家对习惯法概念的认识并不统一,但这并不影响我们在比较确定的范围内对习惯法概念进行界定。本文通过比较研究的方法,并结合政治学、哲学、人类学的相关理论,将习惯法界定为独立于制定法之外的,在一定领域或地域的长期社会生活中逐渐形成的,调整当事人权利义务关系的具有一定强制性的行为规范总和。本文还论证了习惯法作为正式法源的合理性与合法性。在习惯法和法制的关系上,本文认为,自从国家法产生以来,社会就进入了二元社会秩序形态,表现为以习惯法主导的社会秩序和以制定法主导的社会秩序共同存在。在当今中国,随着市场经济的深入发展,建设社会主义法制国家已成为治国理政的基本方略,在这种情形下,习惯法规则几乎处在被边缘化的地位,因而,对民俗习惯的价值功能的忽视,也就合乎常理。但是社会的复杂性与社会调整体系的多元性决定了法律只能作为社会调整体系中的基本的、主要规则体系,而不是,也不可能是唯一的规则体系。通过对习惯法和国家法关系的研究,本文认为,在法制现代化进程中,国家制定法不能简单的宣布习惯法无效或者强行以法律取代习惯法,而应该对习惯法进行扬弃,积极吸收习惯法中有价值、有利于推进法制现代化进程的因素,同时,我们也要剔除习惯法中不适应社会化大生产的成分、不合理的落后的因素,剔除违背宪法和法律精神的习惯法。
[Abstract]:In order to define the concept of customary law scientifically and clarify the role of customary law in the process of legal system in contemporary China, this paper uses Marxist materialist dialectics to guide, at the same time, the method of historical analysis and the method of comparison. By combining theory with practice, this paper makes a scientific study on the formation and evolution of customary law, the legal source status of customary law, the relationship between customary law and national law, and the role of customary law in the process of legal system in contemporary China. At present, the definition of the concept of customary law by domestic scholars can be said to be benevolent, different wisdom, everyone's understanding of the concept of customary law is not uniform, but this does not affect us to define the concept of customary law in a more definite scope. In this paper, by means of comparative study and combining with the relevant theories of politics, philosophy and anthropology, we define customary law as one which is formed gradually in the long-term social life of a certain field or region, independent of the statutory law. Regulating the relationship between the rights and obligations of the parties has a certain mandatory behavior norms. This paper also demonstrates the rationality and legality of customary law as a formal source of law. In the relationship between customary law and legal system, this paper holds that since the emergence of national law, the society has entered the dual social order, which is manifested by the existence of the social order dominated by customary law and the social order dominated by statutory law. In today's China, with the further development of the market economy, building a socialist legal state has become the basic strategy of governing the country. In this case, the customary law rules are almost marginalized, so, It is reasonable to ignore the value function of folklore. However, the complexity of society and the diversity of social adjustment system determine that the law can only be regarded as the basic, main rule system in the social adjustment system, and not, it can not be the only rule system. Through the study of the relationship between customary law and national law, this paper holds that in the process of modernization of the legal system, the state law should not simply declare the customary law null or void or force the law to replace the customary law, but should sublate the customary law. Actively absorbing the valuable elements of customary law is conducive to promoting the modernization of the legal system. At the same time, we should also remove elements of customary law that are not suitable for socialized mass production and that are unreasonably backward. The removal of customary law that is contrary to the spirit of the Constitution and the law.
【学位授予单位】：北方工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】