论体育行业自治与法治的反思性合作——以中国足球协会为中心

发布时间：2018-05-13 14:07

  本文选题：法治体育 + 行业自治　； 参考：《体育科学》2016年04期

【摘要】：在法治与体育行业自治关系的研究上,"介入说"和"自治说"以及积极性合作式路径都缺少反思性思维,忽视了这些路径可能产生的负效应影响。反思性合作受启于反思法理论和"合作治理"理论,是对二者的吸收与超越。在中国语境下,法治与体育行业自治应该建立在一种反思性合作关系之上。据此,反思性思维将主导合作关系,间接性合作将成为主导的合作路向,在此基础上构建具体的反思性合作制度。既可通过自治来实现合作,还可以通过设定用尽内部救济原则、法院的有限度介入和内部救济司法化等方面的间接规制来实现合作。中国足球协会在机构建制和制度建制方面的努力在某种程度上实现了内部的分工自治,但存在与政府的依赖性合作、行业自治被压缩与变形、绝对拒斥与司法权的合作、内部救济司法化建制不力等问题。对此,问题的具体解决思路应以反思性合作思维来设计。
[Abstract]:In the study of the relationship between the rule of law and the autonomy of the sports industry, the "intervention theory" and "autonomy theory" and the positive and cooperative path lack of reflective thinking, ignoring the possible negative effects of these paths. Reflective cooperation is absorbed and transcended by the theory of reflective law and cooperative governance. In Chinese context, the rule of law and sports autonomy should be based on a reflective cooperative relationship. On this basis, reflective thinking will dominate the cooperative relationship, indirect cooperation will become the leading direction of cooperation, and on this basis, the specific reflective cooperation system will be constructed. Cooperation can be realized not only through autonomy, but also by setting up the principle of exhaustion of internal remedies, the limited intervention of the court and the indirect regulation of the judicial system of internal relief. To a certain extent, the Chinese Football Association has realized the internal division of labor autonomy in the institutional and institutional systems, but there are dependent cooperation with the government, the industry autonomy has been compressed and transformed, and absolutely rejected the cooperation with the judicial power. The internal relief judicial system is weak and so on. Therefore, the concrete solution of the problem should be designed by reflective cooperative thinking.
【作者单位】： 韩山师范学院政法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第56批面上资助项目(2014M561278)
【分类号】：G80-05
，

本文编号：1883457