构建与监察改革相适应的职务犯罪侦查法治模式

发布时间：2018-05-18 02:39

本文选题：监察委员会 + 职务犯罪　；参考：《法学》2017年07期

【摘要】：监察改革使得监察委员会获得了法定的职务犯罪侦查权。逐步将监察委员会的所有侦查措施纳入法治框架是落实依法治国的应有之义。如果监察委员会既有法外侦查权,又有法内侦查权,那么一方面会导致侦查和公诉之间不衔接,另一方面会引发侦查人员出于办案需要随意切换法内外侦查措施的风险,从而使当事人的基本权利面临不确定的风险。在监察委员会设立后,合理的改革方案应当是:按照中央要求规范党内调查措施,同时逐步以指定居所监视居住,或者留置吸收法外侦查措施,从而将依规治党和依法治国有机结合起来,实现党领导下的监察全覆盖。
[Abstract]:The supervisory reform has given the commission the statutory power to investigate crimes committed by duty. It is necessary to implement the rule of law by gradually incorporating all the investigative measures of the supervisory committee into the framework of the rule of law. If the supervisory committee has both the power of extra-judicial investigation and the power of investigation within the law, on the one hand, it will lead to a lack of convergence between the investigation and the public prosecution, and on the other hand, it will lead to the risk that investigators need to switch investigative measures inside and outside the law at will for the purpose of handling cases. So that the basic rights of the parties to face the risk of uncertainty. After the establishment of the supervisory committee, a reasonable reform plan should be to standardize the inner-party investigation measures in accordance with the requirements of the central authorities, and to gradually monitor residence with designated residence, or to retain and absorb extra-legal investigative measures. In order to manage the party according to the rules and manage the country according to law organically, the supervision under the leadership of the party can be realized.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学法治中国建设研究中心;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金重大项目“人民代表大会制度理论创新研究”(批准号14ZDA014) 华东政法大学高峰学科创新团队项目“法治战略研究”(A-4901-17-00502)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D917.6

【相似文献】