马尔科维奇民主思想研究

发布时间：2018-05-21 10:34

  本文选题：马尔科维奇 + 实践　； 参考：《黑龙江大学》2010年博士论文

【摘要】： 民主理想与民主制度的分裂是现代民主政治困境的根源,把民主局限于制度和程序层面,忽视民主实践中的公民培养和公共领域建设,必然导致民主制度和实质民主的理想发生冲突。完善有效的民主制度保证正义顺利实现,公民个体和公民社会组织的成熟和发展是民主制度不可缺失的前提。建构作为公共领域的自治社会是社会民主运动的重要内容,通过抵制政治霸权、经济剥削和文化垄断,可以为民主的普遍化发展创造条件。前南斯拉夫实践派代表人物马尔科维奇关于现代民主困境的哲学思考具有重要理论价值,他在实践哲学基础上试图以个体实践论、民主制度论、社会自治论为主要内容的民主理论弥合有限民主与实质民主之间的分裂,促进了现代民主理论的发展。在他看来,实践是成熟公民个体必备的本质特征,民主是以建构实践的人与实践的社会为宗旨的人们的自我管理,完善的公民社会的民主模式是实践的人的自治,通过政治的哲学化和哲学的伦理化可以克服实用主义哲学和实证主义民主政治观。他的民主政治哲学启示我们,通过培养人的道德规范意识和实践能力,拓展社会民主的实质性发展,进一步使公民社会完善,是现代社会民主政治实践的重要内容。发展民主政治的任务不只是建构制度框架和社会秩序原则,社会民主的目的指向的是人的全面发展,政治民主只有以公民文化的发展为基础和目的,才能调和制度和人之间存在的紧张关系。 政治与伦理应该在实践哲学中得到统一,并贯彻于民主政治实践之中。实践哲学不是从抽象的人性出发来看待社会政治秩序的,相反,它认为人是在一定的社会关系和能动的实践中历史发展的,民主政治的实质是建立人类共同生活需要的伦理交往关系形式,这种社会关系形式可以平衡多样化的现代社会利益诉求,为人的自由自觉的创造提供可能。现代民主政治哲学应该认识到这些能力和伦理关系在公民社会中能得到培育和发展,并且反过来支撑民主政治制度。
[Abstract]:The division between democratic ideal and democratic system is the root of the predicament of modern democratic politics. It limits democracy to the level of system and procedure, neglects the cultivation of citizens and the construction of public sphere in democratic practice. Inevitably leads to the conflict between democratic system and the ideal of substantive democracy. Perfect and effective democratic system ensures the smooth realization of justice, and the maturation and development of individual citizen and civil society organization is the prerequisite of democratic system. The construction of an autonomous society as a public sphere is an important part of the social democratic movement. By resisting political hegemony, economic exploitation and cultural monopoly, we can create conditions for the universal development of democracy. Markovich, the representative of the former Yugoslav school of practice, has important theoretical value in his philosophical thinking on the plight of modern democracy. He tries to use the theory of individual practice and the theory of democratic system on the basis of practical philosophy. The theory of democracy, which is the main content of the theory of social autonomy, has bridged the division between limited democracy and substantial democracy and promoted the development of modern democratic theory. In his opinion, practice is the essential characteristic of a mature citizen, democracy is the self-management of people whose purpose is to construct a practical person and a practical society, and the perfect democratic model of civil society is the autonomy of a person in practice. The philosophy of pragmatism and positivism can be overcome by the philosophy of politics and the ethics of philosophy. His democratic political philosophy enlightens us that it is an important content of democratic political practice in modern society to develop the substantive development of social democracy and further improve civil society by cultivating people's moral sense and practical ability. The task of developing democratic politics is not only to construct the institutional framework and the principles of social order, but also to point to the all-round development of human beings. Political democracy is based on the development of civic culture. In order to reconcile the system and the existing tension between people. Politics and ethics should be unified in practical philosophy and carried out in democratic political practice. The philosophy of practice does not view the social and political order from the perspective of abstract human nature. On the contrary, it holds that human beings develop historically in a certain social relationship and dynamic practice. The essence of democratic politics is to establish a form of ethical communication which human beings need to live together. This form of social relations can balance the diverse interests of modern society and provide the possibility for the free and conscious creation of human beings. Modern democratic political philosophy should realize that these abilities and ethical relationships can be cultivated and developed in civil society and, in turn, support democratic political system.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D09

【引证文献】

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前3条

1 宋宇;马尔科维奇的社会批判理论研究[D];黑龙江大学;2016年

2 曹静;葛兰西有机知识分子理论研究[D];兰州大学;2014年

3 张小娅;葛兰西“有机知识分子”理论研究[D];西安科技大学;2012年

，

本文编号：1918852