非法证据排除规则与公安刑事执法若干问题探析

发布时间：2018-05-31 02:04

本文选题：刑事诉讼 + 非法证据　；参考：《暨南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：证据是刑事诉讼活动的关键和核心，完善且具有可操作性的非法证据排除规则对保障犯罪嫌疑人和被告人权利、遏制非法取证行为、实现司法正义具有重要的意义。本次《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》（以下称“《刑事诉讼法》”）1修改是我国社会主义民主法制建设的又一重大成就。《刑事诉讼法》这部有着“小宪法”之称的部门法的全面修改所带来的社会影响是广泛而深远的，从立法上对2010年颁布施行的《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》和《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》（以下称“两证据规定”）其中相关内容提升到基本法律的层面。本文论述了公安机关在刑事司法实践中，必须准确把握排除非法证据的范围和程序，树立正确的执法理念，进一步落实强化相关配套工作，确保严格准确而有效地适用诉讼法律加强打击犯罪。笔者在全面深入学习新法的基础上，从介绍非法证据排除规则的起源出发，尝试阐述非法证据排除规则的运行方式和证明标准等问题，并结合自身工作实践，小结几点新法实施后非法证据排除规则将带给公安机关最突出的挑战，提出了几点不成熟的建议，，权当抛砖引玉，希望籍此引起广大同行对新法的学习和讨论兴趣，为执法实践提供参考。
[Abstract]:Evidence is the key and core of criminal proceedings. It is of great significance to perfect and operate the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence to protect the rights of criminal suspects and defendants, to curb illegal evidence collection and to realize judicial justice. This revision of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal procedure Law") is another major achievement in the construction of socialist democracy and legal system in China. The social impact of the comprehensive revision of the law is widespread and far-reaching. Legislative provisions on certain issues concerning the examination and judgment of evidence in handling death penalty cases promulgated and enforced in 2010 and provisions on the exclusion of certain issues of illegal evidence from handling Criminal cases (hereinafter referred to as the "two evidence provisions") The relevant content is raised to the level of basic law. This paper discusses that in the practice of criminal justice, the public security organs must accurately grasp the scope and procedure of excluding illegal evidence, set up a correct concept of law enforcement, and further implement and strengthen the relevant supporting work. To ensure strict, accurate and effective application of litigation law to strengthen the fight against crime. On the basis of comprehensive and in-depth study of the new law, starting from the introduction of the origin of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, the author tries to expound the operation mode and standard of proof of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, and combines with his own work practice. After the implementation of the new law, the exclusion rules of illegal evidence will bring the most outstanding challenges to the public security organs. They have put forward some immature suggestions, and they hope to arouse the interest of the vast number of colleagues in the study and discussion of the new law. It provides reference for law enforcement practice.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】