协商民主视野下我国公用事业价格听证中消费者参与研究

发布时间：2018-06-29 05:09

本文选题：价格听证 + 协商民主　；参考：《上海师范大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 价格听证制度是影响政府价格决策的主要形式,它的实施有助于加强公民对政府价格决策行为的参与和监督,以保证政府价格决策程序和决策结果的公平、公正。随着1998年《中华人民共和国价格法》首次以法律的形式确定了价格听证制度以来,我国各种类型的价格听证会不断的召开,并且取得了一定的成功,然而我们也应该看到,我国的价格听证制度在实践中其实并不近如人意,“作秀会”、“涨价会”渐渐成为了人们对价格听证会的代表词,价格听证会的公信力明显下降,严重阻碍了制度本身的发展。本文就是从这一现状出发,以协商民主的相关理论作为理论视角,对我国价格听证过程中消费者博弈失衡的原因进行分析,进而设计出消费者参与的基本路径,以期为我国价格听证制度的改革,提供一定的理论依据。本文分四个部分,第一部分为绪论部分,主要是对本文研究背景、研究价值、本文所涉及的相关概念、相关问题的研究综述以及本文研究思路、研究方法和创新之处等进行简要的概括。第二部分提出由于公用事业存在“定价困境”,因此需要对其实行价格管制,而为了确保公共物品、公共服务和垄断产品价格的相对合理性,在对其定价的过程中,可以实行价格听证制度,而这一制度在基本价值和理念上都与协商民主的理念不谋而合。第三部分是通过分析讨价听证中的讨价还价博弈,提出由于消费者讨价还价的失败,致使在价格听证过程中“逢听必涨”现象严重,并进一步分析了导致消费者博弈失衡的主要原因,即主体原因与信息原因。第四部分则从协商民主的理论视角出发,针对上述导致消费者博弈失衡的几个原因提出改进的策略,使消费者更有效地参与到价格听证的过程中。这些策略主要有:完善价格听证的制度建设;健全价格听证参加人遴选机制;充分发挥消费者协会在公用事业价格听证中的作用;消除价格听证中的信息不对称;规范听证主持人的选用机制等。因此,只有通过种种手段,让消费者更有效地进行讨价还价,才能真正使我国价格听证制度走出困境。
[Abstract]:Price hearing system is the main form that affects the government price decision. Its implementation is helpful to strengthen citizen's participation and supervision of government price decision making, so as to ensure the fairness and justice of government price decision procedure and decision result. Since the price hearing system was first established in the form of law in the people's Republic of China in 1998, various types of price hearings in China have been held continuously and have achieved certain success. However, we should also see that, In fact, the price hearing system in our country is not nearly satisfactory in practice. "show" and "price increase meeting" have gradually become the representative words of the price hearing, and the credibility of the price hearing has obviously declined. This seriously hinders the development of the system itself. Based on the present situation, this paper analyzes the reasons for the imbalance of consumer game in the process of price hearing in China from the perspective of the theory of deliberative democracy, and then designs the basic path of consumer participation. In order to provide a certain theoretical basis for the reform of the price hearing system in China. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part is the introduction part, mainly to the research background, the research value, the related concept, the related question research summary as well as the research thought of this article, Research methods and innovations are briefly summarized. The second part points out that the public utilities need to be subject to price control because of the "pricing dilemma", and in order to ensure the relative rationality of the prices of public goods, public services and monopolistic products, in the process of pricing public goods, public services and monopolistic products, Price hearing system can be implemented, and this system coincides with the idea of deliberative democracy in basic value and concept. In the third part, by analyzing the bargaining game in the bargaining hearing, the author points out that due to the failure of the consumer bargaining, the phenomenon of "rising whenever heard" in the process of price hearing is serious. Furthermore, it analyzes the main reasons that lead to the imbalance of consumer game, that is, the main cause and the information reason. In the fourth part, from the perspective of the theory of deliberative democracy, the author puts forward some improved strategies to enable consumers to participate in the process of price hearing more effectively in view of the above reasons which lead to the imbalance of consumer game. These strategies include: perfecting the system construction of price hearing; perfecting the selection mechanism of price hearing participants; giving full play to the role of consumer associations in public utility price hearing; eliminating the information asymmetry in price hearing; Standardize the selection mechanism of hearing moderator and so on. Therefore, only through all kinds of means, let the consumer carry on the bargaining more effectively, can make our country price hearing system really extricate from the predicament.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：F726

【相似文献】