法治化语境下的信访制度研究
[Abstract]:The system of letters and visits is a system with Chinese characteristics, an important part of our democratic political system, and a regular activity for Party committees and governments at all levels to handle letters from the people and receive visits from the masses. However, with the arrival of the social transformation period, various social contradictions have become increasingly prominent and increased, and citizens'awareness of rights has gradually awakened, which makes the original defective petition system encounter unprecedented embarrassment and crisis, and is heading for the point of institutional change. After witnessing the morbidity and melancholy of the petition system, Feng has to reflect deeply on the operation mode and value orientation of the current petition system in both theoretical and practical circles. Generation dispute resolution mechanism, to a certain extent, makes up for the defects and deficiencies of the modern rule of law, but there are too many contradictions and confusion in the system itself, we need to be calm observation, in-depth analysis and responsible solution. On the premise of analyzing the present system of letters and visits, we should rationally evaluate the merits and demerits of the system of letters and visits, explore the reasons for the plight of the system of letters and visits, and then, on the basis of practical exploration and theoretical research, find out the feasible ideas to improve the system of letters and visits so as to provide some thoughts and suggestions for the construction of the rule of law and harmonious society in China.
The first part is the explanation of the concept of the system of letters and visits. It has the function of information collection and feedback, the function of "safety valve" to vent people's complaints and alleviate social contradictions, and the function of right relief.
The value of the system includes the realization of justice, the maintenance of freedom and the protection of order. The value of the system is the significance of the system and the establishment of the system. And the implementation of the important basis for the establishment of the petition system, the implementation of all aspects of the need for value awareness, value evaluation and value choice.
The third part is the historical interpretation of the system of letters and visits.According to the different numbers, characteristics and operation modes of letters and visits in different periods, the system of letters and visits in New China can be roughly divided into three stages: the system of letters and visits at the beginning of the founding of New China, that is, the embryonic and preliminary formation stages; the system of letters and visits during the Cultural Revolution and the period of putting chaos out of order Through the method of historical analysis, this paper analyzes the general laws and characteristics of the development of the system of letters and visits, with a view to providing some thoughts and suggestions for the reform of the system of letters and visits in China.
The fourth part is the realistic predicament of the petition system.The main predicament of the petition system includes the complexity of the petition organization and the mutual transfer of responsibility between different departments. The stage characteristic of enlightenment is the inevitable outcome of the adjustment of social and political structure, economic structure and cultural structure. This paper focuses on the political, economic, rule of law and cultural point of view, in-depth analysis of the reasons for the plight of letters and visits, only to find the crux of the problem, we can give a good medicine for the reform of letters and visits.
The fifth part is about the reform of the system of letters and visits. In the face of the high tide of letters and visits and the many drawbacks of the system itself, the heated debate on the existence and abolition of the system of letters and visits in the theoretical and practical circles can be roughly divided into three points of view: the theory of reinforcement, the theory of cancellation and the theory of improvement. In fact, it is conducive to social stability and harmony. Although both reinforcement theory and cancellation theory are reasonable, they are somewhat reckless and extreme, and prone to social conflicts and disorder.
The reform of the system of letters and visits is a systematic project, which needs not only innovation in the system but also implementation in practice. We should actively explore the system of the Commissioner of the People's Congress with Chinese characteristics, speed up the formulation of a complete system of letters and visits law, deepen the reform of the judicial system, and perfect the operational mechanism matching the current system of letters and visits. Only when we work together in a multi-pronged way and form a joint force can we gradually guide letters and visits into a systematic, procedural and scientific track.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D920.0;D632.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任喜荣;;作为“新兴”权利的信访权[J];法商研究;2011年04期
2 孙大雄;;信访制度功能的扭曲与理性回归[J];法商研究;2011年04期
3 周益挺;;社会转型背景下信访制度功能的异化[J];经济研究导刊;2011年18期
4 常颖;张力文;张展展;;论我国信访制度的立法完善[J];商业文化(下半月);2011年06期
5 王锴;杨福忠;;论信访救济的补充性[J];法商研究;2011年04期
6 孙杰;;新疆多民族地区信访渠道的分析[J];科技信息;2011年20期
7 杜爱霞;;对完善我国转型期涉法涉诉信访制度的思考[J];中州学刊;2011年05期
8 安秀伟;;从日本苦情制度看我国信访制度的改革[J];河北青年管理干部学院学报;2011年04期
9 曹飞;;在法治背景下谈信访制度之存废[J];青春岁月;2011年16期
10 张雄飞;;信访制度的法治化与律师参与机制的完善[J];中国律师;2010年08期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杜楠;;浅析现阶段信访制度的完善途径[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第2辑)[C];2010年
2 宋协娜;周念群;;改革开放30年中国信访制度变迁研究[A];中国特色社会主义:理论·道路·事业——山东省社会科学界2008年学术年会文集(4)[C];2008年
3 李连江;;信访制度改革与和谐社会建设[A];北京论坛(2006)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——对人类文明方式的思考:“和谐社会与治理机制”政府管理分论坛论文或摘要集(上)[C];2006年
4 李娜;;党群关系视阈下的信访制度[A];适应新形势新任务,,进一步提高领导科学发展能力——中国领导科学研究会2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
5 阎耀军;宋协娜;张美莲;;信访问题预警的理论模型及指标体系[A];2010年中国社会学年会——“社会稳定与危机预警预控管理系统研究”论坛论文集[C];2010年
6 麻新平;;董必武人民司法观与信访制度的权利救济[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第十辑)[C];2010年
7 田文利;;信访制度的定性分析和机构设置研究[A];中国法学会行政法学研究会2010年会论文集[C];2010年
8 张伟;;涉诉信访的现状、困境与解决途径[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第2辑)[C];2010年
9 钟泉伟;;抓好信访稳定工作 促进和谐垦区建设[A];黑龙江垦区现代化大农业建设理论研讨会论文专辑下册[C];2009年
10 李小兵;;完善机制固根基 畅通渠道解疑难——从奉新信访实践浅议如何完善群众诉求表达机制[A];江西省宜春市社会科学界联合会“创新社会管理促进社会和谐”征文活动论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 李田生;“民间信访局长”现象[N];西部时报;2004年
2 本报记者 章涌;强化权力是信访制度改革的方向[N];湘声报;2005年
3 向卫华;浅谈如何正确理解和处理群众的“上访”问题[N];团结报;2011年
4 九鼎公共事物研究所研究员 秋风;法治与信访并行不悖[N];中国经营报;2005年
5 本报记者 房煜 实习记者 仝亚娜;行政领域信访程序将有调整[N];经济观察报;2004年
6 本报记者 张道平 实习生 孙欣沛;为啥没人来上访[N];中国县域经济报;2011年
7 傅国涌;也说信访制度改革[N];南方周末;2004年
8 赵凌;信访改革引发争议[N];南方周末;2004年
9 本报记者 李田生;信访制度走到十字路口[N];西部时报;2004年
10 曲江区委办 李旭阳;对当前信访制度改革的思考[N];韶关日报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 张修成;1978年以来中国信访工作研究[D];中共中央党校;2007年
2 叶笑云;平衡视阈下的当代中国信访制度研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
3 张炜;公民的权利表达及其机制建构[D];西南政法大学;2008年
4 李微;涉诉信访制度研究[D];中南大学;2008年
5 王勇;城市化进程中失地农民的利益表达[D];华中师范大学;2007年
6 赵树坤;社会冲突与法律控制[D];西南政法大学;2007年
7 张健;转型期扩大公民有序政治参与问题研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
8 王欢;行政解纷机制研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
9 王文祥;弱势群体的利益表达机制研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
10 张亚勇;党的领导与公民有序政治参与研究[D];中共中央党校;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘云雷;涉诉信访制度研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2011年
2 薄存东;我国信访制度的困境及出路[D];山东大学;2010年
3 李宁;博弈论视角下的信访制度研究[D];华东理工大学;2011年
4 武焰;信访制度的功能演变及其制度完善[D];中国政法大学;2011年
5 顾莉莉;信访制度问题与改革对策研究[D];华东理工大学;2011年
6 陈志磊;中国信访制度改革研究[D];郑州大学;2010年
7 丁
本文编号:2207361
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2207361.html