当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 法治论文 >

论检察视野下的司法民主

发布时间:2018-10-24 12:32
【摘要】: 司法民主是人类司法程序的追求目标之一。检察活动作为国家司法活动重要的组成部分,需要不断加强司法民主建设,扩大民众参与程度,在程序上接受监督,充分保障社会公平正义、维护法律尊严和人民合法权益。 对于司法民主概念有很多争议,至今没有一个统一的定义。本文研究司法民主的概念,首先从民主和司法的概念入手,根据它们之间的关系,分析司法民主的内在含义,进而得出较为全面的概念定义。本文对司法民主概念的表述为:司法民主是司法权人民性的体现,司法机关应向民众公开各项职能、公民的权利和有关程序规定,人民群众按照制度规定参与司法活动,从而有效维护自身权益,监督司法公正,促进司法进步。 检察视野下的司法民主是由检察权的人民性、司法程序的公开性要求和保障人权的司法要求所决定的。检察机关在检察活动中,按照司法程序公开原则,以保证人民当家作主为目标,充分保障当事人及其他诉讼参与人的诉讼权利,体现现代司法民主要求,让民众享有参与检察活动和有效监督检察活动的机会和途径,以推动实现检察活动的公平和正义。检察视野的司法民主也是在借鉴、结合和创新的基础上逐步发展的,具有中国的特色,有着科学、合理的理论基础支持,主要有人民主权理论、权力监督理论、权利保障理论和法治理论等。 近年来,中国检察机关对司法民主的实践一直进行着积极的探索,先后推出了检务公开制度和人民监督员制度。本文以调查报告的形式对两项制度的发展阶段、实践成效和遇到的困难进行了分析,并提出检察机关必须深化司法民主观念,揭开检察工作的神秘面纱,使司法民主真正深入人心。 本文提出了深化司法民主观念、完善检务公开和人民监督员制度,创新建立检察听证制度、舆情民主监督制度和引入第三方评估机制等司法民主实践形式,以期推动检察机关司法民主实践的进一步发展。
[Abstract]:Judicial democracy is one of the pursuit goals of human judicial procedure. As an important part of national judicial activities, procuratorial activities need to constantly strengthen the construction of judicial democracy, expand the degree of popular participation, accept supervision in procedure, fully safeguard social fairness and justice, and safeguard the legal dignity and the legitimate rights and interests of the people. There is a lot of controversy about the concept of judicial democracy, so far there is no uniform definition. This paper studies the concept of judicial democracy, starting with the concept of democracy and justice, according to the relationship between them, analyzes the inherent meaning of judicial democracy, and then comes to a more comprehensive definition of the concept. This article describes the concept of judicial democracy as follows: judicial democracy is the embodiment of the people's character of judicial power, the judicial organ should open all its functions to the public, the rights of citizens and the relevant procedures, and the masses shall participate in judicial activities in accordance with the regulations of the system. Thus effectively safeguard their own rights and interests, supervise judicial justice, and promote judicial progress. The judicial democracy in the procuratorial field is determined by the people's character of procuratorial power, the openness of judicial procedure and the judicial requirement of protecting human rights. In procuratorial activities, the procuratorial organs, in accordance with the principle of openness of judicial procedures, aim at ensuring that the people are masters of their own affairs, fully protect the litigant rights of the parties and other participants in the proceedings, and embody the requirements of modern judicial democracy. Let the public enjoy the opportunity and the way to participate in and supervise the procuratorial activities effectively, in order to promote the fairness and justice of the procuratorial activities. The judicial democracy of procuratorial vision is also gradually developed on the basis of reference, combination and innovation, with Chinese characteristics, scientific and reasonable theoretical support, mainly the theory of people's sovereignty and the theory of power supervision. The theory of right guarantee and the theory of rule of law. In recent years, China's procuratorial organs have been actively exploring the practice of judicial democracy, and have successively introduced the system of public procuratorial affairs and the system of people's supervisors. In the form of investigation report, this paper analyzes the development stage, practical effect and difficulties of the two systems, and points out that procuratorial organs must deepen the concept of judicial democracy and uncover the mysterious veil of procuratorial work. To make judicial democracy truly popular. This paper proposes to deepen the concept of judicial democracy, perfect the system of procuratorial affairs open and people's supervisors, innovate the establishment of procuratorial hearing system, democratic supervision system of public opinion and the introduction of third-party evaluation mechanism, etc. With a view to promoting further development of judicial democratic practice of procuratorial organs.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D926.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 方跃平;德国政府信息公开制度简析[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年03期

2 田涛;司法民主辩析[J];中共杭州市委党校学报;2003年02期

3 王剑虹;;检察民主:域外考察与本土实践[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2009年01期

4 何兵;司法职业化与民主化[J];法学研究;2005年04期

5 高一飞;;人民监督员制度改革研究[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2009年04期

6 卞建林;田心则;;人民监督员制度立法刍议[J];人民检察;2006年15期

7 马宝成;略论目前我国政务公开的几个主要问题[J];学习论坛;2001年04期

8 聂辰席;;公开与保密的平衡:美国政务公开立法及其对我国的启示[J];北京行政学院学报;2005年06期

9 陈伯礼;许秀姿;;检察民主研究[J];行政与法(吉林省行政学院学报);2005年12期

10 朱孝清;;充满生机和活力的中国特色社会主义检察制度[J];中国法学;2008年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 中国政法大学教授 何兵;[N];经济观察报;2008年



本文编号:2291433

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2291433.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户88198***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com