涉法涉诉信访法治化路径研究
发布时间：2019-03-05 15:10
【摘要】：关于信访制度去向的各种方案,加强论与法治相悖,废除论则过于简单。改革论可取,但鲜见治本之策和具体可行的方案。笔者主张将信访现象根据其背后的问题进行类型化,在此基础上分别研究其法治化的解决方案以及与其对应的信访制度的转型和改革。 本文先是从涉法涉诉信访成因的角度分析和展现了涉法涉诉信访面临的问题,从三个方面探讨了涉法涉诉信访法治化的路径。先是检讨了我国的法治实践和理论,进而提出涉法涉诉信访法治化的根本路径即法治的中国化。又在涉法涉诉信访诉求类型化分析的基础上检讨了我国诉讼机制存在的漏洞,提出了将各类涉法涉诉信访诉求加以诉权化改造,并完善诉讼程序以实现和保障诉权,进而将各种涉法涉诉信访尽可能地纳入诉讼体系,此为微观方面的具体方案。最后检讨了政治、社会因素与涉法涉诉信访法治化的冲突或阻碍,并提了出用法治理性引导和重建政治、社会理性的具体建议,为涉法涉诉信访法治化提供可能的政治、社会环境,此为宏观方面的具体方案。
[Abstract]:The strengthening theory is contrary to the rule of law and the abrogation theory is too simple. Reform theory can be taken, but rarely see the root of the solution and concrete and feasible plan. The author advocates that the phenomenon of letters and visits should be typed according to the problems behind them. On this basis, the author will study the solutions to the rule of law and the transformation and reform of the corresponding system of letters and visits respectively. This paper first analyzes and shows the problems faced by the legal-related complaint and petition from the perspective of the causes of the legal-related complaint and petition, and probes into the path of the legalization of the legal-related lawsuit-related complaint from three aspects. Firstly, the author reviews the practice and theory of the rule of law in our country, and then puts forward the basic path of ruling by law, that is, the rule of law in China. On the basis of the analysis of the types of complaints and petitions involved in law, this paper reviews the loopholes existing in the litigation mechanism of our country, puts forward the idea of transforming all kinds of claims related to litigation into rights of appeal, and consummates the litigation procedure to realize and protect the right of action. Furthermore, all kinds of legal-related complaints and visits are brought into the litigation system as far as possible, which is a micro-specific scheme. Finally, the paper reviews the conflicts or obstacles between political, social factors and the legalization of letters and visits involving in the law, and puts forward concrete suggestions for guiding and rebuilding politics and social rationality with the rationality of the rule of law, in order to provide possible politics for the legalization of letters and petitions involving the law. Social environment, this is macroscopical aspect concrete plan.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925
本文编号：2435038
[Abstract]:The strengthening theory is contrary to the rule of law and the abrogation theory is too simple. Reform theory can be taken, but rarely see the root of the solution and concrete and feasible plan. The author advocates that the phenomenon of letters and visits should be typed according to the problems behind them. On this basis, the author will study the solutions to the rule of law and the transformation and reform of the corresponding system of letters and visits respectively. This paper first analyzes and shows the problems faced by the legal-related complaint and petition from the perspective of the causes of the legal-related complaint and petition, and probes into the path of the legalization of the legal-related lawsuit-related complaint from three aspects. Firstly, the author reviews the practice and theory of the rule of law in our country, and then puts forward the basic path of ruling by law, that is, the rule of law in China. On the basis of the analysis of the types of complaints and petitions involved in law, this paper reviews the loopholes existing in the litigation mechanism of our country, puts forward the idea of transforming all kinds of claims related to litigation into rights of appeal, and consummates the litigation procedure to realize and protect the right of action. Furthermore, all kinds of legal-related complaints and visits are brought into the litigation system as far as possible, which is a micro-specific scheme. Finally, the paper reviews the conflicts or obstacles between political, social factors and the legalization of letters and visits involving in the law, and puts forward concrete suggestions for guiding and rebuilding politics and social rationality with the rationality of the rule of law, in order to provide possible politics for the legalization of letters and petitions involving the law. Social environment, this is macroscopical aspect concrete plan.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王亚新;;“再审之诉”的再辨析[J];法商研究;2006年04期
2 彭浩;;涉诉信访终结相关理论问题之澄清[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2010年02期
3 张卫平;;起诉难:一个中国问题的思索[J];法学研究;2009年06期
4 范忠信;;法制(治)中国化:历史法学的中国使命(论纲)[J];理论月刊;2011年01期
5 苏力;;法条主义、民意与难办案件[J];中外法学;2009年01期
6 周永坤;诉权法理研究论纲[J];中国法学;2004年05期
7 王亚新;;民事审判监督制度整体的程序设计——以《民事诉讼法修正案》为出发点[J];中国法学;2007年05期
8 苏力;;关于能动司法与大调解[J];中国法学;2010年01期
9 强世功;迈向立法者的法理学——法律移植背景下对当代法理学的反思[J];中国社会科学;2005年01期
，本文编号：2435038
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2435038.html
