法治理念下的行政程序证据制度研究

发布时间：2019-05-12 19:01

【摘要】： 法治不仅是对社会治理机制、社会活动方式和社会秩序状态这样宏观层面上的要求,更需要行政执法这样微观领域具体制度的支持,行政程序证据制度一定程度是从微观层面对行政法治的有效保障。在我国法治化建设过程中,尤其应当加强行政程序领域中证据制度的研究和立法完善。本文旨在依循法治的理念,综合运用语义分析、功能分析、规范分析、历史分析、实证分析和比较分析等研究方法,对行政程序证据制度作较为深入的阐释。文章第一章主要是在界定行政程序概念的基础上展开对法治理念下的行政程序、行政程序证据制度与行政法治、行政程序证据制度与正当行政程序关系等问题的讨论,并主张在行政法治、正当行政程序理念下构建行政程序证据制度。第二章主要对行政程序证据制度若干基本问题作相关介绍。该部分立足于证据概念的分析,对行政程序证据和行政程序证据制度概念进行界定,并且论述行政程序证据与行政诉讼证据的区别与联系,同时分析行政程序证据的属性、种类、特征以及行政证据制度及其功能等基本问题。第三章对行政程序证据制度价值进行分析。该部分立足于行政程序价值的分析对行政程序证据制度的价值进行定位,主张行政程序证据制度应以实现公正和效率均衡为价值取向。第四章按照行政程序证据证明程序取证、举证、质证、认证、查证的逻辑顺序分别论述行政程序证据取证制度、举证制度、质证制度、认证制度、查证制度,以及与此相对应的证据收集规则、证明责任分配规则、证据认证规则以及证据审查规则。初步勾勒出行政程序证据具体制度的基本理论体系。第五章对我国行政程序证据制度如何立法完善进行展望。该部分通过域外行政程序中的证据制度立法状况的介绍和比较研究,对照我国立法状况,尤其是相关制度的缺陷和不足,提出若干完善建议,并主张通过将之附属于行政程序法的立法模式对之进行系统规范。并提出在条件尚未成熟时,可以对行政程序证据制度进行分阶段、有计划的立法。
[Abstract]:The rule of law is not only a macro requirement for the mechanism of social governance, the mode of social activities and the state of social order, but also needs the support of specific systems in the micro field such as administrative law enforcement. To a certain extent, the evidence system of administrative procedure is an effective guarantee of administrative rule of law from the micro level. In the process of the construction of rule of law in our country, the research and legislative perfection of evidence system in the field of administrative procedure should be strengthened. The purpose of this paper is to explain the evidence system of administrative procedure by means of semantic analysis, functional analysis, normative analysis, historical analysis, empirical analysis and comparative analysis, in accordance with the concept of the rule of law. The first chapter of the article mainly discusses the administrative procedure under the concept of rule of law, the relationship between the administrative procedure evidence system and the administrative rule of law, the administrative procedure evidence system and the due process of administration on the basis of defining the concept of administrative procedure. And advocate the construction of administrative procedure evidence system under the concept of administrative rule of law and proper administrative procedure. The second chapter mainly introduces some basic problems of administrative procedure evidence system. This part is based on the analysis of the concept of evidence, defines the concept of administrative procedural evidence and administrative procedural evidence system, and discusses the differences and relations between administrative procedural evidence and administrative litigation evidence, and analyzes the attributes of administrative procedural evidence. Types, characteristics and administrative evidence system and its functions and other basic issues. The third chapter analyzes the value of administrative procedure evidence system. This part is based on the analysis of the value of administrative procedure evidence system to position the value of administrative procedure evidence system, and argues that the value orientation of administrative procedure evidence system should be to realize the balance of justice and efficiency. The fourth chapter discusses the administrative procedure evidence collection system, proof system, cross-examination system, authentication system, verification system according to the logical order of administrative procedure evidence proof procedure, proof, cross-examination, cross-examination and verification. And the corresponding evidence collection rules, burden of proof allocation rules, evidence authentication rules and evidence review rules. A preliminary outline of the administrative procedure evidence specific system of the basic theoretical system. The fifth chapter looks forward to how to perfect the evidence system of administrative procedure in our country. Through the introduction and comparative study of the legislative situation of the evidence system in the foreign administrative procedure, this part puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the legislative situation of our country, especially the defects and shortcomings of the relevant system. It also advocates that it should be regulated systematically through the legislative mode which is attached to the administrative procedure law. It is pointed out that when the conditions are not yet mature, the administrative procedure evidence system can be legislated in stages and in a planned way.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】