大学生休闲动机、无聊感和生活满意度的关系研究
本文选题:生活满意度 切入点:无聊感 出处:《河北大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着经济的不断发展,当代大学生的生活领域不断丰富,休闲活动日益增多,但人们的生活品质却没有随之提高,反而无聊感变得日益突出。生活满意度被看作幸福感的认知因素,对评价心理健康水平有着重要的参考价值。参与休闲实践活动的动机对在休闲活动中是否能得到愉快体验也有着重大影响。辅助大学生在看待无聊感的问题上保持积极态度,提高身心愉悦程度正是人们的关注焦点。因此,本调查建立在之前的相关研究基础上,对大学生休闲动机、无聊感和生活满意度的联系展开调查。采用调查法中的访谈和问卷对大学生进行调查,选用的研究工具为《休闲动机问卷》、《大学生无聊倾向问卷》(BPQ)和《大学生生活满意度评定量表》(CSLSS)以及自编访问大纲。探讨了大学生休闲动机、无聊感和生活满意度之间的关系以及三者之间的中介作用机制。利用spss统计软件对数据进行描述统计、差异性检验、相关分析、回归分析和中介效应检验等统计。得出了以下结论:(1)通过访谈得出大学生的休闲动机、无聊感和生活满意度的真实情况为:参加休闲活动的动机多为机体内部需要;无聊感的体验中下等水平;生活满意度中上等水平,且朋友和生活费被认为是动摇生活满意度评价的最重要两个原因。(2)大学生休闲动机的内在动机维度、生活满意度学习成绩维度上的分数存在显著的性别差异,女生得分高于男生。生活满意度的经济状况维度在家庭来源和专业上存在明显的差异性,在年级变量上除了健康状况维度,其余各维度均存在显著的差异。(3)休闲动机的无动机、投入规范与无聊感的单调性、孤独感、自控力、紧张感、约束性呈显著的相关,其中,无动机同自控力是显著的负相关关系,其余都为显著的正相关。生活满意度整体分数与认同规范、内在动机维度显著的正相关,与外在规范显著的负相关。生活满意度和单调性、紧张感、约束性呈显著的负相关,与自控力呈显著正相关。(4)休闲动机的内在动机对生活满意度有正向预测作用(5)休闲动机对生活满意度的具体作用路径分别有:内在动机直接影响生活满意度;认同规范通过紧张感或自控力对生活满意度的影响;认同规范直接影响生活满意度。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, the field of life of contemporary college students is constantly rich, leisure activities are increasing day by day, but the quality of life of people has not been improved. On the contrary, boredom has become increasingly prominent. Life satisfaction is seen as a cognitive factor in happiness. It has important reference value for evaluating the level of mental health. The motivation to participate in leisure practice also has a great influence on the pleasure experience in leisure activities. It helps college students to maintain a positive attitude towards the problem of boredom. Improving the degree of physical and mental pleasure is the focus of people's attention. The relationship between boredom and life satisfaction was investigated. Interviews and questionnaires were used to investigate college students. The research tools were "Leisure motivation questionnaire", "College students boredom tendency questionnaire" (BPQ), "College students Life satisfaction rating scale" (CSLSSS) and self-compiled interview outline. The relationship between boredom and life satisfaction and the mediating mechanism between them. Using spss statistical software to describe the data, test the differences, analyze the correlation. Regression analysis and intermediary effect test. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) through interviews, the author concludes that the real situation of college students' leisure motivation, boredom and life satisfaction is: the motivation to participate in leisure activities is mostly for the internal needs of the body; The middle and lower level of boredom experience, the middle and upper level of life satisfaction, and the inner motivation dimension of college students' leisure motivation are considered to be the two most important factors to shake the evaluation of life satisfaction, such as friends and living expenses. There were significant gender differences in scores in the dimensions of life satisfaction, and the scores of girls were higher than those of boys, and the economic status of life satisfaction had significant differences in family sources and majors. There were significant differences in the other dimensions except the health status dimension in grade variables. (3) No motivation for leisure motivation, significant correlation between input norms and monotony, loneliness, self-control, tension and constraint, among which, There was a significant negative correlation between motivation and self-control, while the others were significantly positive correlation. The overall score of life satisfaction was positively correlated with identity norms, and the intrinsic motivation dimension was significantly positive correlation. There is a significant negative correlation between life satisfaction and monotonicity, tension and constraint. There is a significant positive correlation between leisure motivation and self-control. (4) the inner motivation of leisure motivation has a positive predictive effect on life satisfaction. 5) the specific action paths of leisure motivation to life satisfaction are as follows: inner motivation directly affects life satisfaction; Identity norms affect life satisfaction through tension or self-control; identity norms directly affect life satisfaction.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 田志鹏;刘勇;滕召军;;中学生无聊倾向特点及其与自恋、主观幸福感的关系[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2014年06期
2 宋瑞;;休闲与生活满意度:基于全国样本的实证分析[J];中国软科学;2014年09期
3 温忠麟;叶宝娟;;中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J];心理科学进展;2014年05期
4 周浩;王琦;董妍;;无聊:一个久远而又新兴的研究主题[J];心理科学进展;2012年01期
5 叶丽;;当代大学生休闲生活状况分析[J];山西青年管理干部学院学报;2011年04期
6 王静波;;大学生休闲生活中存在的问题及对策[J];江苏教育学院学报(社会科学);2011年06期
7 娄霞;;无聊感的自陈测量方式[J];社会心理科学;2011年10期
8 金青云;;休闲体育参加者的休闲动机与主观幸福感的关系[J];体育学刊;2011年05期
9 黄时华;张卫;胡谏萍;;“无聊”的心理学研究述评[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
10 姚本先;石升起;方双虎;;生活满意度研究现状与展望[J];学术界;2011年08期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李璐;大学生生命意义感、无聊感与生活满意度的关系研究[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2016年
2 严昌亮;通化地区城市居民休闲动机与生活满意度的关系研究[D];延边大学;2015年
3 石美玲;大学生生活事件、心理弹性与生活满意度的关系研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年
4 李彬彬;厦门岛内居民休闲动机与休闲满意度及其相关性研究[D];福建师范大学;2014年
5 许丹;大学生学习无聊、无聊倾向与自立人格的关系研究[D];福建师范大学;2013年
6 陈姝羽;大学生学业压力、心理弹性及生活满意度的关系研究[D];西南大学;2013年
7 娄霞;大学生心理控制源、休闲动机和无聊感的关系研究[D];西南大学;2012年
8 彭维;生命意义感对大学生无聊倾向性的影响[D];南京师范大学;2012年
9 杨红君;依恋、述情障碍与抑郁的关系[D];中南大学;2009年
10 陈彦宏;大学生休闲动机、休闲满意度与主观幸福感的关系[D];四川师范大学;2008年
,本文编号:1668231
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1668231.html