解释水平对得失框架下跨期选择的影响

发布时间：2018-03-29 05:38

本文选题：解释水平　切入点：得失框架　出处：《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：解释水平理论属于“社会认知”的范畴,它的核心思想是人对于某一事件的心理表征决定了人对这一事件的反应。许多研究者发现,人们在解释心理距离比较远的事物时更习惯于采用能反映事物内涵的核心特征来解释事物,而在解释心理距离比较近的事物时更倾向于采用具体的、背景化的特征来解释事物。因此,人们在选择心理距离较近的即时获益和心理距离较远的延时获益时,会产生差异。也有研究发现,人们在进行跨期选择时会因情境的不同而做出不同的选择。本研究旨在考察被试在高低两种解释水平以及获得与损失两种框架条件下的跨期选择的差异,以往研究都只考虑了解释水平一种因素,而本研究在此基础上加入了获得与损失两种框架以检验两种因素的交互作用以及对跨期选择的影响。本研究主要选取大学生为实验研究的被试,首先通过纸笔启动实验启动了被试的高低两种解释水平,接着设立了获得和损失两种不同的框架条件的跨期选择题,以考察在这两种因素对被试跨期选择的影响。分析数据发现解释水平的主效应显著,得失框架的主效应显著,两者的交互作用边缘显著。因此得出的结论主要有以下几个： (1)在两种启动条件下,损失框架中的被试选择延迟选项的得分以及主观值比获得框架中的被试高。 (2)在两种框架条件下,高解释水平组的被试选择延迟选项的得分以及主观值比低解释水平组的被试高。 (3)解释水平和得失框架的交互作用呈边缘显著。 (4)简单主效应显示在获得框架中,启动了高解释水平的被试选择延迟选项的得分要显著高于启动了低解释水平的被试。 (5)在低水平解释条件下,被试在两种框架中的延迟选项得分有显著的差异。
[Abstract]:The level of interpretation theory belongs to the category of "social cognition". Its core idea is that the psychological representation of a certain event determines a person's response to the event. Many researchers have found that, People are more accustomed to explain things with the core characteristics that reflect the connotation of things when explaining things which are far away from their psychology, but they tend to use concrete ones when explaining things that are closer to the mental distance. Background features explain things. As a result, there are differences when people choose the immediate benefits that are closer to the psychological distance and the delayed benefits that are farther away from the psychological distance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences of intertemporal choices between participants under the conditions of high and low levels of interpretation and the conditions of acquisition and loss. Previous studies have taken into account only one factor, the level of interpretation, On the basis of this, two kinds of frame of gain and loss are added to test the interaction of the two factors and the influence on the intertemporal selection. The main purpose of this study is to select college students as the subjects of the experimental study. First, the paper starts the experiment with paper and pen to start up the two levels of interpretation of the participants, and then sets up two different frame conditions to obtain and lose the cross-period multiple choice questions. In order to investigate the influence of these two factors on the intertemporal selection of the subjects, the main effects of interpretation level are significant, the main effects of gain and loss frames are significant, and the interaction edges of the two factors are significant. Therefore, the main conclusions are as follows:. 1) under the two starting conditions, the scores and subjective values of the selection delay options in the loss frame were higher than those in the acquisition framework. (2) under the two frame conditions, the scores of the selection delay options and subjective values of the subjects in the high interpretation level group were higher than those in the low explanation level group. 3) the interaction between the level of explanation and the frame is marginal. 4) the simple main effect showed that in the acquisition framework, the participants who started the high interpretation level had significantly higher scores on the selection delay option than those who started the low explanation level. 5) under the condition of low level explanation, there were significant differences in the scores of delay options between the two frameworks.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842

【参考文献】