消极情绪调节期待量表中文版测评大学生样本的效度和信度

发布时间：2018-03-30 09:13

本文选题：消极情绪调节期待量表　切入点：大学生　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2014年11期

【摘要】：目的:在大学生群体中修订消极情绪调节期待量表(NMRE)中文版,并检验其效度和信度。方法:从北京和山东选取800名大学生(样本1)完成NMRE中文版的初测,通过项目分析和探索性因子分析确定32个项目的正式问卷。从山东省选取400名大学生(样本2)施测NMRE中文版正式问卷,进行验证性因子分析、内部一致性检验,同时施测流调中心用抑郁量表(CESD)、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)和应对量表(COPE),以及内控性、有势力他人及机遇量表(IPC)和Marlowe-Crowne社会期望量表(MCSD),以检验效标关联效度。6周后从样本2中随机选取80名大学生再次施测NMRE中文版,以检验重测信度。结果:探索性因子分析显示量表为单维结构,验证性因子分析表明该量表拟合良好(RMSEA=0.06,NFI=0.97,CFI=0.95,GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.95)。NMRE总分与CESD、STAI、COPE回避应对、IPC有势力他人和机遇得分均呈负相关(r=-0.28~-0.57),而与COPE问题解决应对、情感应对维度得分及IPC内控性、MCSD得分呈正相关(r=0.32、0.17、0.31、0.22),均P0.001。量表的Cronbachα系数为0.88,重测信度为0.81。结论:消极情绪调节期待量表中文版具有较好的测量学指标,可以用于大学生消极情绪调节期待的研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: to revise the Chinese version of NMRE in college students and to test its validity and reliability. Methods: 800 college students (sample 1) were selected from Beijing and Shandong to complete the initial test of the Chinese version of NMRE. Through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, the formal questionnaire of 32 items was determined. 400 college students (sample 2) were selected from Shandong Province to carry out the formal questionnaire in Chinese version of NMRE, which was used for confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency test. At the same time, depression scale (CESD), STAI and coping scale (COPEI), and internal control, were used in the center of flow survey, including depression scale (CESD), status-trait anxiety scale (STAI) and coping scale (COPEI). The influential others and opportunities scale (IPC) and the Marlowe-Crowne Social expectation scale (Marlowe-Crowne) were used to test the validity of correlation between the two groups. After 6 weeks, 80 college students were randomly selected from sample 2 to test the Chinese version of NMRE again. Results: exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale was a single dimensional structure. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the total score of the scale was negatively correlated with the scores of influential others and opportunities of CESDS-STAICOPE, and was negatively correlated with the scores of COPE problem solving, while the total score of NMRE was negatively correlated with the scores of CESD-STAICOPE and other powerful people and opportunities, but it was negatively correlated with the scores of COPE problem solving, and the total score of NMRE was negatively correlated with the scores of positive people and opportunities in CESD-STAICOPE. There was a positive correlation between the scores of affective coping dimension and the score of IPC internal control. There was a positive correlation between the scores of 0.32 / 0.17 and 0.31 / 0.22, respectively (P0.001). The Cronbach 伪 coefficient of the scale was 0.88 and the test-retest reliability was 0.81.Conclusion: the Chinese version of the Chinese version of the passive emotion Regulation expectation scale has a better measurement index. It can be used in the study of negative emotion regulation expectation of college students.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学社会学院;中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室;中国科学院大学;Department
【基金】：中国政法大学校级人文社科研究项目(11ZFG18001) 中国政法大学心理学重点学科资助
【分类号】：B842

【参考文献】