中文版员工真实性量表的信效度检验

发布时间：2018-04-21 15:35

本文选题：员工真实性 + 员工真实性量表(IAM　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2016年03期

【摘要】：目的:检验员工真实性量表(Individual authenticity measure at work,IAM Work)在中国企业员工中应用的信度和效度。方法:用IAM Work中文版对657名企业员工进行测试,在样本中随机抽取214名员工同时施测IAM Work中文版、Utrecht工作投入量表简版(UWES-9)、建言行为量表和中国企业员工工作幸福感量表,并在两个月后重测。结果:验证性因素分析验证了员工真实性的三因素模型。各拟合指标分别为χ~2/df=2.61,NFI=0.94,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,GFI=0.93,AGFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05。简版量表为χ~2/df=2.99,NFI=0.97,CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,GFI=0.96,AGFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.06。所有项目的决断值均显著(P0.001),项目与量表总分的相关在0.46~0.77之间。IAM Work中文版量表和真实的生活、自我异化、接受外部影响的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.92、0.90、0.93、0.91。简版量表的Cronbach’sα系数依次为0.89、0.83、0.92、0.92。IAM Work量表两个月后的重测信度为0.79,简版为0.78。IAM Work中文版总分、简版总分与工作幸福感(r=0.67,0.58,P0.01)、工作投入(r=0.50,0.43,P0.01)与建言行为(r=0.34,0.23,P0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:IAM Work中文版量表和简版量表具有良好的信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of individual authenticity measure at Workplace in Chinese enterprises. Methods: 657 employees were tested with the Chinese version of IAM Work, and 214 employees were randomly selected from the sample to test Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES-9), speech behavior scale and Chinese Enterprise work Well-being scale. And retest it two months later. Results: confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor model of employee authenticity. The fitting indexes were 蠂 ~ 2 / d ~ (-1) / d ~ (61) ~ (NFI) ~ (0.94) CFI ~ (0.96) ~ 0.96 ~ 0.96 ~ 0.93% AGFI ~ (0.91) ~ 0. 05 ~ 0. 05 ~ 0. 05 ~ 0. 01% RMSEAA. The simple version of the scale was 蠂 2 / dfg 2.99% NFI 0.97 / CFI 0.98F / F 0.98F / F 0.96AGFI 0.94% RMSEAA 0.06. The total scores of items and total scores were 0.46 / 0.77. The Chinese version of IAM Work and real life, self-alienation, Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of accepting external influence were 0.920.900.900.30.91, respectively. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of the simplified version of the scale was 0.89 / 0.830.92 / 0.92.The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.79 after two months. The total score of the simplified version was the total score of the Chinese version of 0.78.IAM Work. There was a significant positive correlation between the total score of the simplified version and the work well being (r 0.500.433P 0.01) and the constructive behavior (0.34 / 0.23p 0.01). Conclusion the Chinese version of Work and the simplified version of the scale have good reliability and validity and are suitable for use in Chinese context.
【作者单位】：中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室;中国科学院大学;
【基金】：中科院心理所创新项目“国民幸福感指数的建构与影响因素识别”(Y1CX193007)
【分类号】：B844.3

【参考文献】