信札中的微观心理学历史:黄翼形重错觉研究报告的曲折境遇

发布时间：2018-04-30 00:22

本文选题：黄翼 + 信札研究　；参考：《心理学报》2017年04期

【摘要】：本文透过微观历史的视角,以黄翼与周先庚、吴有训等人的10余封通信为素材,还原了黄翼两篇形重错觉研究报告的评审与发表过程,揭示出黄翼与审稿人汪敬熙、主编吴有训、好友周先庚以及导师格塞尔之间的冲突、协商和合作的复杂学术互动。这些信札作为私人交流的媒介,记录了当时心理学知识生产中局部的、互动的、存在于特定关系之中的思想、计划和动机。信札中的对话涉及到当时心理学学术成果评审的几方面核心问题:评审标准和流程、写作语言规范、学术权威、同行举荐、创新性认可、文献引用等诸多问题。本文进一步以科学知识社会学的视角对这些问题进行分析,解构学术"象牙塔"的传统形象,以此揭示和反思心理学知识生产的内在过程。
[Abstract]:Based on more than 10 correspondence between Huang Yi and Zhou Xiangueng, Wu Youxun and others, the review and publication process of Huang Yi's two research reports on the illusion of shape and weight has been restored, and Huang Yi and reviewer Wang Jingxi have been revealed in this paper. Editor-in-Chief Wu Youxun, close friend Zhou Xiangueng, and mentor Gessel, the complex academic interaction between negotiation and cooperation. These letters, as a medium for private communication, record the ideas, plans, and motivations that existed in specific relationships in the production of psychological knowledge at the time. The dialogue in letters involves several core issues in the review of academic achievements in psychology at that time: evaluation criteria and processes, writing language norms, academic authority, peer recommendation, innovative recognition, literature citation, and so on. This paper further analyzes these problems from the perspective of sociology of scientific knowledge, deconstructs the traditional image of "ivory tower", and reveals and reflects on the inner process of psychological knowledge production.
【作者单位】：河北师范大学心理学系;约克大学心理学系;
【基金】：中国科协“老科学家学术成长资料采集工程”项目资助(2012-F-Q-XH09)
【分类号】：B84-09

【参考文献】