武警基层军官职业人格问卷的编制与应用研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 06:30

本文选题：武警基层军官 + 职业人格　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的:(1)根据构想的武警基层军官职业人格理论模型,编制武警基层军官职业人格问卷,并检验其信效度。(2)运用编制问卷研究武警基层军官职业人格与其工作绩效的关系。方法:首先采用文献法、开放式问卷调查法、职务分析法、访谈法建构武警基层军官职业人格理论模型,根据模型编制武警基层军官职业人格初测问卷,然后通过项目分析和探索性因素分析,形成正式问卷,最后通过验证性因素分析和相关分析考察问卷的信效度。基层军官样本分两次施测,问卷初测样本军官451名,正式施测样本军官443名,正式施测时选取200名军官同时完成MBTI和工作绩效量表。结果:(1)武警基层军官职业人格问卷由42个项目组成,包含7个一阶因子和2个二阶因子,一阶因子为:F1:进取性,F2:领导力,F3:坚韧性,F4:服从性,F5:公平性,F6:牺牲精神,F7:亲和性;二阶因子为:F8:任务取向,F9:关系取向。(2)内部一致性分析显示,Cronbachα系数为0.79-0.96,分半信度为0.75-0.95。(3)内部相关分析表明,一阶因子、二阶因子分之间的相关系数为0.38-0.84,相关均极其显著(p0.001);所有一阶因子与其相应的二阶因子相关均较高,而与另一个二阶因子相关均较低。(4)验证性因子分析显示,测验数据与理论模型的各拟合指标均达到测量学要求。(5)问卷各因子与MBTI、工作绩效量表各维度相关显著。(6)MBTI人格类型差异研究结果表明,ESTJ型军官职业人格因子得分显著高于非ESTJ型军官。(7)军龄差异研究结果表明,一阶因子进取性、领导力、坚韧性、牺牲精神、亲和性得分差异显著(p0.05-0.01),两个二阶因子得分差异显著(p0.05-0.001)。(8)职务差异研究结果表明,一阶因子得分差异显著(p0.05-0.001),两个二阶因子得分差异显著(p0.05-0.01)。结论:(1)问卷职业人格理论模型与探索性因子分析结果基本相符合,经过验证性因子分析表明,最终的问卷正式模型与数据相拟合。(2)通过考察Cronbachα系数、分半信度,表明问卷具有良好的信度指标。(3)采用文献法、职务分析法、调查访谈法以及专家评估等方法,保证问卷具有良好的内容效度。(4)通过考察问卷的内部一致性、聚敛效度、区辨效度以及验证性因子分析,表明问卷具有良好的结构效度。(5)通过计算职业人格问卷与MBTI量表、工作绩效量表的相关系数,比较军官职业人格分数的MBTI人格类型、军龄和职务差异,证明问卷具有较高的相容效度和实证效度。(6)武警基层军官职业人格问卷能有效预测军官的任务绩效和关系绩效,其中,领导力、坚韧性、进取性对任务绩效的预测度较高,服从性、进取性对关系绩效的预测度较高。(7)该问卷是测量武警基层军官职业人格的理想工具,对基层军官的选拔有一定的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Objective: 1) based on the theoretical model of professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police, to compile the questionnaire of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police, and to test its reliability and validity. 2) to study the relationship between the professional personality of the officers at the basic level of the armed police and their work performance by using the questionnaire. Methods: first of all, the theoretical model of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police was constructed by the methods of literature, open questionnaire, job analysis and interview, and the preliminary questionnaire of the professional personality of the basic officers of the armed police was compiled according to the model. Then the formal questionnaire is formed by item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are investigated by confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis. The basic officer sample was divided into two groups. 451 officers were first tested and 443 officers were formally tested. 200 officers were selected to complete the MBTI and the work performance scale at the same time. Results: the Professional Personality questionnaire of basic military officers was composed of 42 items, including 7 first-order factors and 2 second-order factors. The first order factor was: F1: aggressive F2: leadership F3: tenacity F4: obedient F5: fairness F6: sacrifice spirit F7: affinity; The internal consistency analysis showed that the Cronbach 伪 coefficient was 0.79-0.96, and the split-half reliability was 0.75-0.95.3) Internal correlation analysis showed that the first order factor was the first order factor. The correlation coefficient between the second order factor score and the second order factor score is 0.38-0.84, the correlation is extremely significant (p 0.001), all the first-order factors have a higher correlation with the corresponding second-order factor, but the correlation with the other second-order factor is lower. All the fitting indexes of the test data and the theoretical model are up to the requirement of measurement. (5) the factors of questionnaire and MBTI, the correlation of each dimension of work performance scale, the difference of personality type of MBTI are significant. The results show that the scores of professional personality factor of ESTJ officers are obvious. The results of the study on the difference of military age between the military officers and non- officers showed that, The scores of first order factor, leadership, tenacity, sacrifice spirit and affinity were significantly different (p 0.05-0.01g), and the difference between two second-order factors was significant (p 0.05-0.001n. The first order factor score was significantly different from that of the second order factor score (p0.05-0.001), and the second order factor score was significantly different from that of the second order factor score (p0.05-0.01). Conclusion: the occupational personality theory model of the questionnaire is basically consistent with the exploratory factor analysis results. The confirmatory factor analysis shows that the final formal model fits with the data. The results show that the questionnaire has good reliability index. 3) by using the methods of literature, job analysis, interview and expert evaluation, the questionnaire has good content validity. The validity of the questionnaire and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire had good structural validity. (5) by calculating the correlation coefficient between the occupational personality questionnaire and the MBTI scale and the job performance scale, the MBTI personality types of the officers' professional personality scores were compared. The difference between military age and position proves that the questionnaire has higher compatibility validity and empirical validity. The questionnaire can effectively predict the task performance and relationship performance of the officers, including leadership, tenacity, tenacity, etc. This questionnaire is an ideal tool for measuring the professional personality of the grass-roots officers of the armed police, and has certain reference significance for the selection of the officers at the grass-roots level.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：B848

【相似文献】