自我建构、解释水平与反馈对合作行为的影响

发布时间：2018-05-09 19:20

本文选题：合作行为 + 自我建构　；参考：《曲阜师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：当人们遇到集体利益和个人利益发生矛盾冲突时,如何协调两者之间的关系,是在当前竞争日益激烈的环境下,人们经常需要面对的两难问题情境。对于大学生来说,不论是在独特的宿舍文化还是在科研合作等方面,都需要在集体和个体利益间做出有效权衡,同样需要应对各种各样的两难问题。研究大学生决策的影响因素,有利于指导大学生做出正确的决策选择,同时也有利于引导其形成更为成熟的社会交往模式。自我建构不同的个体对于合作行为选择并不一致,而且有研究发现自我建构与解释水平对合作有重要的影响。但一般都是分别对二者进行研究,没有关于其交互作用的分析,而且在不同反馈方式下探讨这两个因素对合作的影响的研究,目前来说还非常少。本研究试图从自我建构与解释水平角度探讨社会两难情境中个体的合作行为,特别是不同反馈条件下的自我建构和解释水平对个体合作行为产生的影响。本研究以社会两难问题研究中的公共物品两难实验范式作为任务情境,运用问卷和实验室实验相结合的方法,以大学生为实验被试,采用2×2的被试间实验设计,对自我建构类型以及解释水平两个因素来进行研究,并探讨其在不同反馈方式下的合作倾向。通过对实验数据的统计分析,得出的研究结论如下:1.自我建构类型对合作行为的主效应显著。社会两难情境下,自我建构类型对于个体的合作行为的影响存在差异。相对于独立型自我建构的个体来说,依存型自我建构的个体有更多的合作行为。2.反馈方式对合作行为的主效应显著。社会两难情境下,不同的信息反馈方式对于个体的合作行为的影响不同。在集体反馈方式下个体的合作行为显著高于在个人反馈方式下的个体。3.自我建构与反馈方式存在交互作用:依存型自我建构的个体受反馈方式的影响不大;而独立型自我建构的个体易受反馈方式影响,个人反馈方式下的独立型自我建构的个体的竞争倾向更明显。4.解释水平对合作行为的主效应显著,在社会两难的情境下,解释水平高的个体比解释水平低的个体有更高的合作倾向。5.解释水平与反馈方式不存在交互作用。6.自我建构与解释水平存在交互作用:依存型自我建构的个体无论在高解释水平还是低解释水平启动下其合作行为都较高,其差异不显著;独立型自我建构的个体在高解释水平启动下也有较高的合作行为,但在低解释水平启动下其合作行为倾向则较低。
[Abstract]:When people encounter conflicts between collective and personal interests, how to coordinate their relationship is a dilemma that people often need to face under the increasingly fierce competition environment. For college students, both in the unique dormitory culture and in scientific research cooperation, they all need to be in the collective and the other. An effective trade-off between the interests of the body is also required to deal with a variety of dilemma. The study of the influencing factors of College Students' decision-making is conducive to guiding college students to make a correct decision and to guide them to form a more mature mode of social communication. And some studies have found that the level of self construction and interpretation has an important impact on cooperation. However, it is generally studied separately for the two, and there is no analysis of its interaction, and the study of the impact of the two factors on cooperation under different feedback methods is still very few. This study tries to construct and explain itself from the self construction. A study of the individual cooperative behavior in a social dilemma, especially the impact of the level of self construction and interpretation on the individual cooperative behavior under different feedback conditions. This study uses the paradigm of the public goods dilemma in the study of social dilemma as a task situation, and the method of combining questionnaires and laboratory experiments. Taking the college students as experimental subjects, the 2 x 2 experimental design was used to study the type of self construction and the two factors of the interpretation level, and to explore the cooperation tendency under different feedback methods. Through the statistical analysis of the experimental data, the conclusions are as follows: 1. the main effect of the type of self construction on the cooperative behavior is obvious. Under the situation of social dilemma, there are differences in the effect of self construction type on individual cooperative behavior. Relative to independent self constructed individuals, dependent self constructed individuals have more cooperative behavior and.2. feedback is significant to the main effect of cooperative behavior. In the two difficult situation of society, different ways of information feedback are used. The individual's cooperative behavior has different effects. In the way of collective feedback, the individual's cooperative behavior is significantly higher than that of the individual.3. self construction and feedback in the individual feedback mode: the independent self constructed individual is not influenced by the feedback mode; and the individual self constructed individual is susceptible to the feedback mode. The competitive tendency of individual self constructed individuals under the mode of human feedback is more obvious that the main effect of.4. interpretation level on cooperative behavior is significant. In the situation of social dilemma, the individuals with high level of interpretation have higher cooperative tendency than those with low level of interpretation, and there is no interaction effect of.6. self construction and solution on the.5. interpretation level and the way of feedback. The independent self constructed individuals have higher cooperation behavior regardless of the high interpretation level or low interpretation level, and their differences are not significant. Independent self constructed individuals also have higher cooperative behavior under the high interpretation level, but their cooperative behavior tends to be better under the low interpretation level. Low.

【学位授予单位】：曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】