企业人力资源管理师考试的等值研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 15:27

本文选题：测验等值 + 企业人力资源管理师　；参考：《鲁东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：以经典测验理论为依据,对2015年5月和2015年11月两次企业人力资源管理师考试(三级)的理论考试部分进行等值研究。运用随机等组设计与锚测验相结合的方式,同时使用等值标准误法和交叉验证法对三种基于经典测验理论的线性等值方法(即Tucker线性等值法、Levine观察分数法、Levine真分数法)进行检验与比较,筛选出误差最小且具有最强跨样本稳定性的方法。运用最佳等值方法设计出等值分数转换表,进而为未来相关领域的研究提供思路和参考。研究中所选择的锚测验与两个原测验的相关系数分别为0.835和0.759,这说明锚测验与原测验相关度很高,锚测验比较科学,可以对被试施测。在总体权重为1时,Tucker线性等值法的截距和斜率分别为-3.264和1.051;Levine观察分数法的截距和斜率分别为-8.719和1.188。在总体权重为0.501时,Tucker线性等值法的截距和斜率分别为-3.774和1.063;Levine观察分线法的截距和斜率分别为-8.52和1.183。Levine真分数法的截距和斜率分别为-10.1和1.219。根据等值标准误法计算得出,总体权重为1时的Tucker法的等值标准误最小,为0.741。紧随其后误差依次变大的的分别是总体权重为0.501时的Tucker线性等值法,标准误为0.856、总体权重为0.501时的Levine观察分数法,标准误为2.086、总体权重为1时的Levine观察分数法,标准误为2.137,而Levine真分数法的等值标准误最大,为2.431。根据交叉验证法计算得出,在总体权重为1时,Tucker线性等值法的T值最小,为1.343。紧随其后T值依次变大的分别为总体权重为0.5时的Tucker线性等值法,T值为2.523、总体权重为1时的Levine观察分数法,T值为2.973、总体权重为0.5时的Levine观察分数法,T值为4.199,而Levine真分数法的T值最大,为5.799。对企业人力资源管理师理论考试进行等值研究表明:(1)作为评价等值方法优劣的一种方式,交叉验证法是实用且有效的。(2)无论使用等值标准误法还是交叉验证法来比较等值方法的优劣,均表明,Tucker线性等值法最优,Levine观察分数法其次,Levine真分数法误差最大。总体权重为1时的Tucker法被证明是最优且最适合该类型考试的方法。(3)在企业人力资源管理师理论考试中,等值结果受到总体权重的影响较小。
[Abstract]:Based on the classical test theory, this paper makes an equivalent study on the theoretical examination part of the Enterprise Human Resource Management examination (Grade 3) in May 2015 and November 2015. Using the combination of random equal group design and anchor test, At the same time, three linear equivalence methods based on classical test theory (Tucker linear equivalence method and Levine true fraction method) are tested and compared by using equivalent standard error method and cross validation method. The method with minimum error and strongest stability across samples is selected. An equivalent score conversion table is designed by using the optimal equivalence method, which provides ideas and references for future research in related fields. The correlation coefficients between the anchor test and the two original tests were 0.835 and 0.759 respectively, which indicated that the anchor test had a high correlation with the original test, and the anchor test was more scientific and could be tested on the subjects. The intercept and slope of Tucker linear equivalent method are -3.264 and 1.051g Levine respectively when the total weight is 1 and the intercept and slope of Levine observation fraction method are -8.719 and 1.1888 respectively. The intercept and slope of the Tucker linear equivalent method are -3.774 and 1.063 1.183.Levine, respectively. The intercept and slope of the Tucker linear equivalent method are -8.52 and 1.219, respectively. According to the calculation of equivalent standard error method, the equivalent standard error of Tucker method with total weight of 1 is the smallest, which is 0.741. The Tucker linear equivalence method with a total weight of 0.501, the standard error of 0.856, the Levine observation score method with a total weight of 0.501, the standard error of 2.086 and the Levine observation score method with a total weight of 1 were followed. The standard error was 2.137, while the equivalent error of Levine true fraction method was 2.431. According to the cross validation method, the minimum T value of the Tucker linear equivalent method is 1.343 when the total weight is 1. The value of T of Tucker linear equivalence method is 2.523 when the total weight is 0.5, the value of T of Levine observation fraction method is 2.973 when the total weight is 1, and the value of Levine observation fraction method is 4.199 when the total weight is 0.5, and the value of Levine is 4.199. The true fraction method has the largest T value, 5.799. A study on the equivalent value of the theoretical examination of human resource managers in enterprises shows that "1" is a way to evaluate the merits and demerits of the equivalence method. The cross validation method is practical and effective.) whether the equivalent standard error method or the cross validation method is used to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the equivalent method, it is shown that the Tucker linear equivalent method is the best Levine observation fraction method and the Levine true fraction method has the largest error. The Tucker method with a total weight of 1 has been proved to be the best and most suitable method for this type of examination.) in the theoretical examination of human resource managers in enterprises, the equivalent results are less affected by the total weight.
【学位授予单位】：鲁东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C975;B849

【相似文献】