助长性人际技能测试中文版的信效度检验

发布时间：2018-05-16 03:08

本文选题：助长性人际技能 + 咨询师　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年06期

【摘要】：目的:检验助长性人际技能(FIS)测试在中国文化背景下作为咨询师人际能力测量工具的信度和效度。方法:由124位被试填写人际反应指针量表和社会技能量表,独立完成FIS测试,由2位评分者对被试在测试中的行为表现独立评分。结果:(1)探索性因素分析表明,FIS测试可抽取2个因子,累积方差贡献率为74.810%;(2)FIS测试8个项目之间及7个任务情境之间的Cronbach’s Alpha系数分别为0.892和0.931,总分的评分者信度ICC为0.952,各项目及各任务情境的ICC在0.767~0.949之间;(3)除希望感外,FIS测试的其它7个项目与总分相关显著;(4)除说服力外,专业组与非专业组被试的FIS测试总分及其它项目得分均差异显著。结论:FIS测试中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用来测量我国咨询师的助长性人际技能。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of the instrumental interpersonal skills (fish) test as a tool for measuring the interpersonal competence of counselors in Chinese cultural background. Methods: a total of 124 subjects were enrolled in the interpersonal reaction pointer scale and Social skill scale, and the FIS test was completed independently, and the behavioral performance of the subjects was assessed independently by two raters. Results the exploratory factor analysis showed that the FIS test could extract two factors. The contribution rate of cumulative variance was 74.8100.The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient between 8 items and 7 task situations were 0.892 and 0.931, respectively, the reliability of the total score was 0.952, and the ICC of each item and task situation was between 0.767and 0.949) except the sense of hope. In addition to persuasion, the other 7 items in the FIS test were significantly correlated with the total score. The scores of FIS test and other items were significantly different between the professional group and the non-professional group. Conclusion the Chinese version of the FIS test has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure the positive interpersonal skills of Chinese counselors.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金重大投标项目:国民心理卫生素养及其提升机制与对策(16ZDA232)
【分类号】：B841.7

【相似文献】