当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 心理论文 >

意义违背与意义的流动补偿:道德信念肯定效应研究

发布时间:2018-05-28 12:53

  本文选题:意义维持模型 + 流动补偿 ; 参考:《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:意义维持模型认为,由于新经验的事实与个体基于既有信念形成的预期出现冲突,个体便体验到意义违背,并驱使个体采取自我调节策略缓解这种意义违背。本研究试图从道德领域入手,着眼于流动补偿的肯定效应,通过四项实验研究,探讨意义违背诱发的道德信念肯定效应及其心理机制。研究一包含2项实验,探讨意义违背诱发的道德信念肯定效应。实验一分别以道德判断、道德规范遵守意愿为因变量,探讨意义违背操纵对道德判断严厉性、道德规范遵守意愿的影响。实验一证实,意义违背操纵后,被试将表现出更高水平的道德信念肯定行为,包括将道德行为判断为更道德,将不道德行为判断为更不道德,以及更高水平的道德规范遵守意愿。实验二以道德关注为因变量,探讨意义违背操纵对道德关注的广度、深度的影响。实验二发现,意义违背操纵后,被试道德关注的深度显著提高,但未发现道德关注广度的显著差异。研究二包含1项实验,探讨既有道德信念在意义违背与道德信念肯定关系中的调节作用。实验三发现,对于“关爱/伤害”道德基础认同水平高、但“公平/欺骗”道德基础认同水平低的被试,意义违背操纵可以显著负向预测被试基于“关爱/伤害”道德基础的道德判断;对于“关爱/伤害”道德基础认同水平低、但“公平/欺骗”道德基础认同水平高的被试,意义违背操纵可以显著正向预测被试基于“公平/欺骗”道德基础的道德判断。研究三包含1项实验,探讨意义维持动机作为意义违背导致道德信念肯定效应的中介机制。实验四证实,意义违背操纵后,基于道德视角的行为评价会更严厉、更迅速,而基于个人视角的行为评价任务中则不存在此效应。同时,意义维持动机可以作为意义违背导致道德信念肯定效应的中介机制;意义违背操纵导致更高水平的意义维持动机,并导致后续行为评价任务中的道德信念肯定效应。以上四项实验研究证明,意义违背可以引发道德信念肯定效应,个体通过道德信念的肯定实现意义的流动补偿。个体的既有道德信念对上述过程起到调节作用,并且该过程是通过意义维持动机的中介作用实现的。此外,还进一步讨论了本研究的价值、不足及未来发展方向。
[Abstract]:The meaning maintenance model holds that, because of the conflict between the facts of the new experience and the expectation of the individual based on the formation of existing beliefs, the individual can experience the violation of meaning and drive the individual to take the self-regulation strategy to alleviate the violation. This study tries to study the positive effect of the flow compensation from the moral field and through four experimental studies, This paper discusses the positive effect of moral belief and its psychological mechanism induced by meaning violation. The study includes 2 experiments to explore the positive effect of moral belief that is violated by meaning. Experiment one confirms that after the meaning goes against manipulation, the subjects will show a higher level of moral belief, including the judgment of moral behavior as more moral, the judgment of immoral behavior as more immoral, and the higher level of moral norms. Experiment two found that the depth of moral concern was significantly increased after the meaning was violated, but the significant difference in the extent of moral concern was not found. Study two included 1 experiments to explore the regulatory role of moral beliefs in the relationship between moral convictions and moral beliefs. Experiment three found that "care / harm" was "love / harm". "The moral foundation identification level is high, but the" fair / deceit "moral basic identification level of the low level of the subjects, meaning contrary to the manipulation can significantly negative prediction based on the moral basis of" care / harm "moral basis; for" care / harm "moral basis of the low level of identification, but the" fair / deceit "moral basis of high level of identification is high Trial, meaning breach of manipulation can significantly forward predictive moral judgment based on the moral basis of "fairness / deception". Study three contains 1 experiments to explore the intermediary mechanism of meaning maintenance motivation as the positive effect of moral belief. Experiment four confirms that the moral perspective of behavior evaluation will be stricter after the meaning is contrary to manipulation. The effect does not exist in the individual perspective based behavior evaluation task. At the same time, the meaning maintenance motivation can be used as the intermediary mechanism of meaning violation that leads to the positive effect of moral belief; meaning violation leads to higher level of meaning maintenance motivation and leads to the affirmative effect of moral belief in the evaluation task of follow-up behavior. The above four experimental studies have proved that the breach of meaning can lead to the positive effect of moral belief, and the individual's moral belief is the flow compensation for the affirmative realization of the meaning. The individual's moral belief has a regulating effect on the process, and the process is realized through the intermediary role of meaning maintenance motivation. The value of this study, the lack of future development direction.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B842

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王珏;吴明证;孙晓玲;;道德失调的自我调节策略[J];心理科学;2016年06期

2 刘艳丽;陆桂芝;刘勇;;结构需求:概念、测量及与相关变量的关系[J];心理科学进展;2016年02期

3 左世江;黄旎雯;王芳;蔡攀;;意义维持模型:理论发展与研究挑战[J];心理科学进展;2016年01期

4 凌虹;陆爱桃;连松洲;李文桃;苏丹晓;;不同情绪对认知失调冲突的影响研究[J];心理研究;2015年02期

5 张宏伟;李晔;;两种道德自我调节机制下的道德行为[J];心理科学进展;2014年07期

6 何W,

本文编号:1946770


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1946770.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户86e75***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com