疼痛共情的内外群体效应研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 00:20

本文选题：疼痛共情 + 内群体　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的：研究一般社会群体条件下和最简单群体条件下人们对他人疼痛共情的内外群体效应情况如何,探索特质共情认知成分和情感成分在人们疼痛共情过程的作用怎样。方法：实验一：选取心理学专业群体和教育技术专业群体有效被试共48名,首先完成IRI-C量表,再进行疼痛判断任务实验程序操作,以疼痛程度评分和反应时作为因变量指标,最后完成群体倾向评定问卷,检验在一般社会群体条件下被试疼痛共情的内外群体效应及特质共情认知成分和情感成分对被试疼痛共情的作用。实验二：选取有效大学生被试56名,首先完成IRI-C量表,通过虚假人格问卷测试进行最简单群体分类,之后进行疼痛判断任务实验程序操作,以疼痛程度评分和反应时作为因变量指标,最后完成群体倾向评定问卷,检验最简单群体条件被试疼痛共情的内外群体效应及特质共情认知成分和情感成分对被试疼痛共情的作用。结果：实验一：疼痛判断任务的疼痛评分上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激主效应显著,内群体立场和外群体立场主效应显著；刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)与对象立场(内群体、外群体)的交互作用显著,进一步的简单效应分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上,内外群体的简单效应显著,被试对内群体的疼痛评分显著高于对外群体的疼痛评分。疼痛判断任务的反应时上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激主效应显著,刺激与对象立场交互作用显著,进一步的简单效应分析得到,对象立场水平上疼痛刺激与非疼痛刺激的简单效应显著,内群体立场水平上被试对疼痛刺激与对非疼痛刺激的反应时之差显著短于外群体立场水平上被试对疼痛刺激与对非疼痛刺激的反应时之差。被试在IRI-C情感成分(共情关注和个人忧伤)分量表上的得分与在疼痛判断任务中的表现得分的相关多于被试在IRI-C认知成分(观点采择和想象)分量表上的得分与在疼痛判断任务中的表现得分的相关。实验二：疼痛判断任务的疼痛评分上,疼痛刺激和非疼痛刺激的主效应显著,内群体立场与外群体立场的主效应显著,刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)与对象立场(内群体、外群体)的交互作用显著,进一步的简单效应分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上内外群体立场的简单效应显著,被试对内群体的疼痛评分显著高于对外群体的疼痛评分。疼痛判断任务的反应时上,疼痛刺激与非疼痛刺激主效应显著,内群体立场与外群体立场的主效应显著,刺激(疼痛、非疼痛)与对象立场(内群体、外群体)的交互作用显著,进一步的简单效应分析得到,疼痛刺激水平上,内外群体立场的简单效应显著,被试对内群体的反应时显著短于对外群体的反应时。被试在IRI-C情感成分(共情关注、个人忧伤)分量表上的得分与被试在疼痛判断任务中的表现得分的相关多于被试在IRI-C认知成分(观点采择、想象)分量表上的得分与在疼痛判断任务中的表现分的相关。结论：1、在一般社会群体条件下,被试对他人的疼痛共情是内群体偏好的；2、在最简单群体条件下,被试对他人的疼痛共情是内群体偏好的；3、特质共情的情感成分在被试对他人的疼痛共情过程中起主要作用。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate how the internal and external population effects on the pain empathy of others under the conditions of general social group and the simplest group, and how to explore the role of idiosyncratic empathy cognitive components and emotional components in the process of pain empathy.
Method: Experiment 1: a total of 48 subjects were selected from the professional psychology group and the educational technology group. First, the IRI-C scale was completed and the experimental procedure of the pain judgment task was performed. The pain degree score and the response time were used as the dependent variable index. Finally, the group tendency assessment questionnaire was completed, and the test was tested under the general social group condition. The effects of empathy on internal and external groups and the effects of empathy, cognitive components and emotional components on empathy were tested.
Experiment two: select 56 effective college students, first complete the IRI-C scale, carry out the simplest group classification through the false personality questionnaire test, then carry out the experiment procedure of the pain judgment task, take the pain degree score and the response time as the dependent variable index, finally complete the group tendency assessment questionnaire, and test the simplest group condition. The effects of empathy on internal and external groups and the effects of empathy, cognitive components and emotional components on empathy were tested.
Results: on the pain score, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulation was significant, the internal group position and the external group stand main effect was significant; the stimulation (pain, non pain) and the object position (internal group, external group) had significant interaction, further simple effect analysis, the level of pain stimulation, inside. The simple effect of the external group was significant. The pain score of the group was significantly higher than that of the external group. The response time of the pain judgment task, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulus was significant, the interaction between the stimulus and the object was significant, the further simple effect was analyzed, and the pain stimulation and the pain stimulation at the level of the object stand. The simple effect of non pain stimulation was significant. The difference between the pain stimulation and the response to the non pain stimulus at the internal group standpoint level was significantly shorter than the difference between the pain stimulus and the response to the non pain stimulus at the outside group position. The scores of the subjects on the IRI-C emotional components (empathy concern and personal sadness) subscale The correlation between the scores on the performance of the pain judgment task was more than the score on the IRI-C cognitive component (view selection and imagination) subscale and the score in the pain judgment task.
Experiment two: the main effect of pain irritation and non pain stimulation was significant in pain judgment task, the main effect of internal group stand and outside group stand was significant, stimulation (pain, non pain) and object position (internal group, external group) had significant interaction, and a simple effect analysis was obtained, and the internal and external groups of pain stimulation level were obtained. The simple effect of the body position was significant, and the pain score of the group was significantly higher than that of the external group. The response time of the pain judgment task, the main effect of pain stimulation and non pain stimulation, the main effect of the internal group position and the outside group stand were significant, the stimulation (pain, non pain) and the object position (internal group, external group). The interaction is significant, and further simple effect analysis shows that the simple effect of the internal and external group stand is significant on the level of pain stimulation, and the response of the subjects to the internal group is significantly shorter than that of the external group. The scores of the subjects on the IRI-C emotional components (empathy concern, personal sadness) and the table of the subjects in the pain judgment task The score of the present score is more than that of the score of the IRI-C cognitive component (opinion taking, imagination) subscale and the performance score in the pain judgment task.
Conclusion: 1, under the general social group conditions, the pain empathy of the subjects is an internal group preference; 2, under the simplest group conditions, the pain empathy of the subjects is the internal group preference; 3, the affective component of the trait empathy is the main effect of the pain empathy of others on Cheng Zhongqi.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842

【参考文献】