元认知问卷在中国大学生中的修订
发布时间：2018-08-03 08:57
【摘要】：目的:修订元认知问卷30题版(MCQ-30),并考察其在中国大学生被试中的信效度。方法:首先选取172名大学生被试进行预测试,据此调整题目,确定最终版内容;正式施测中,共选取了657名被试进行问卷施测;两周后,选取96名被试进行重测。结果:所有题目区分度良好,所有的题总相关均显著(r介于0.366-0.633之间,Ps0.01)。验证性因素分析的结果表明原始问卷结构在数据中的模型拟合(χ~2=877.010,χ~2/df=2.29,RMESA=0.039,CFI=0.923,TLI=0.912,SRMR=0.049)良好,5因子包括:认知自信、对担忧的积极信念、认知自我意识、担忧的无法掌控/危险、控制想法的需要。问卷总体及各维度Cronbachα系数、重测信度、分半信度分别介于0.735-0.897、0.593-0.741、0.715-0.871之间,同时效标关联效度良好,问卷与帕多瓦量表、特质焦虑量表的相关系数分别为0.57、0.37(Ps0.01)。结论:MCQ-30中文版具有良好的信效度,可作为中国大学生元认知水平的测量工具。
[Abstract]:Aim: to revise the 30 question version of metacognitive questionnaire (MCQ-30) and to investigate its reliability and validity in Chinese college students. Methods: 172 college students were selected for pre-test, according to which the final version was determined, 657 subjects were selected to do the questionnaire test, and two weeks later, 96 subjects were selected to retest. Results: all subjects were distinguished well and the total correlation was significant (r = 0.366-0.633). The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitting of the original questionnaire structure in the data (蠂 2 / 877.010, 蠂 ~ 2 / dfU 2.29) RMESAN 0.039 CFI 0.923 TLI 0.912 SRMR0.049) good 5 factors include: cognitive self-confidence, positive belief in worry, cognitive self-awareness, uncontrollable / dangerous of worry, need to control ideas. The overall and dimension Cronbach 伪 coefficients, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were between 0.735-0.8970.593-0.741U 0.715-0.871, respectively. The correlation validity of the questionnaire with Padua scale and trait anxiety scale was 0.570.37 (Ps0.01). Conclusion: the Chinese version of: MCQ-30 has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to measure the metacognition level of Chinese college students.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学心理学院应用实验心理北京重点实验室;南京师范大学心理学院;西北师范大学心理学院;首都医科大学;
【分类号】：B844.2
本文编号：2161244
[Abstract]:Aim: to revise the 30 question version of metacognitive questionnaire (MCQ-30) and to investigate its reliability and validity in Chinese college students. Methods: 172 college students were selected for pre-test, according to which the final version was determined, 657 subjects were selected to do the questionnaire test, and two weeks later, 96 subjects were selected to retest. Results: all subjects were distinguished well and the total correlation was significant (r = 0.366-0.633). The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitting of the original questionnaire structure in the data (蠂 2 / 877.010, 蠂 ~ 2 / dfU 2.29) RMESAN 0.039 CFI 0.923 TLI 0.912 SRMR0.049) good 5 factors include: cognitive self-confidence, positive belief in worry, cognitive self-awareness, uncontrollable / dangerous of worry, need to control ideas. The overall and dimension Cronbach 伪 coefficients, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability of the questionnaire were between 0.735-0.8970.593-0.741U 0.715-0.871, respectively. The correlation validity of the questionnaire with Padua scale and trait anxiety scale was 0.570.37 (Ps0.01). Conclusion: the Chinese version of: MCQ-30 has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to measure the metacognition level of Chinese college students.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学心理学院应用实验心理北京重点实验室;南京师范大学心理学院;西北师范大学心理学院;首都医科大学;
【分类号】：B844.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 郝嘉佳;齐琳;陈英和;;小学六年级数学困难儿童的元认知特点及其在应用题解决中的表现[J];中国特殊教育;2011年02期
2 汪玲,郭德俊,方平;元认知要素的研究[J];心理发展与教育;2002年01期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 路海东;;小学生数学应用题解决元认知问卷的编制研究[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
2 张雅明;俞国良;;《儿童元认知问卷》的编制与修订[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
3 陈换娟;贾宁;;元认知问卷在大学生中的修订[A];心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议论文集[C];2013年
，本文编号：2161244
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2161244.html
