权力概念垂直空间隐喻表征激活的自动性探究
发布时间：2018-08-22 17:28
【摘要】：隐喻一直被当成是一种文学修辞格,Lakoff和Johnson提出的概念隐喻理论认为人通过隐喻借用具体概念来表征抽象概念而实现抽象思维。部分研究者认为对抽象概念的加工会自动激活与其相关的感知觉信息,也有证据表明隐喻表征的激活受到一些条件的限制。本研究从权力概念和空间线索两方面对权力概念垂直空间隐喻表征激活的自动性进行了探究。实验1在Schubert(2005)实验2的基础上加入了存在权力差异的无关词对来对权力关系进行操作,相关词对具有直接明显的权力关系,无关词对具有间接隐蔽的权力关系,结果发现隐喻表征在两种词对条件下均被激活。实验2将实验1中的任务改为相关判断,被试无需有意识地对权力大小进行对比,结果相关词对激活了垂直空间隐喻表征,而无关词对没有激活隐喻表征。实验1,2从目标域权力概念的相对结构出发,表明权力相关词汇不能自动激活权力概念垂直空间隐喻表征,对词汇进行语义加工并理解其中的权力关系是激活隐喻表征的重要条件。实验3与实验1类似,但是将词对的上下呈现方式变为对角呈现,引入水平空间差异对隐喻表征的垂直线索造成干扰,结果并没有影响权力垂直空间隐喻表征的激活。实验4将实验3的任务改为对刺激的左右位置进行反应,结果仍然激活了垂直空间隐喻表征。实验3,4从源域垂直空间结构出发,表明权力概念垂直空间隐喻表征的激活不依赖空间线索。
[Abstract]:Metaphor has always been regarded as a literary figure of speech. The conceptual metaphor theory proposed by Lakoff and Johnson holds that people realize abstract thinking by metaphorically borrowing concrete concepts to represent abstract concepts. Some researchers believe that the processing of abstract concepts automatically activates perceptual information related to them, and there is evidence that metaphorical representation is stimulating. Living is limited by some conditions. This study explores the automaticity of metaphorical representation activation in vertical space of power concepts from the perspectives of power concepts and spatial clues. The results showed that metaphorical representation was activated in both pairs of words. In experiment 2, the task in Experiment 1 was changed to relevant judgment. Subjects did not need to consciously compare the magnitude of power. As a result, the pair of Related words activated the metaphorical representation of vertical space, but the pair of Related words did not excite. Experiments 1 and 2 show that power-related vocabulary can not automatically activate the vertical spatial metaphorical representation of power concepts. Semantic processing of vocabulary and understanding of power relations are important conditions for activating metaphorical representation. In experiment 4, the task of Experiment 3 was changed to respond to the left and right position of the stimulus, and the result still activated the vertical spatial metaphorical representation. Structure shows that the activation of metaphorical representation in the vertical space of power concept does not depend on spatial clues.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2197806
[Abstract]:Metaphor has always been regarded as a literary figure of speech. The conceptual metaphor theory proposed by Lakoff and Johnson holds that people realize abstract thinking by metaphorically borrowing concrete concepts to represent abstract concepts. Some researchers believe that the processing of abstract concepts automatically activates perceptual information related to them, and there is evidence that metaphorical representation is stimulating. Living is limited by some conditions. This study explores the automaticity of metaphorical representation activation in vertical space of power concepts from the perspectives of power concepts and spatial clues. The results showed that metaphorical representation was activated in both pairs of words. In experiment 2, the task in Experiment 1 was changed to relevant judgment. Subjects did not need to consciously compare the magnitude of power. As a result, the pair of Related words activated the metaphorical representation of vertical space, but the pair of Related words did not excite. Experiments 1 and 2 show that power-related vocabulary can not automatically activate the vertical spatial metaphorical representation of power concepts. Semantic processing of vocabulary and understanding of power relations are important conditions for activating metaphorical representation. In experiment 4, the task of Experiment 3 was changed to respond to the left and right position of the stimulus, and the result still activated the vertical spatial metaphorical representation. Structure shows that the activation of metaphorical representation in the vertical space of power concept does not depend on spatial clues.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲁忠义;贾利宁;翟冬雪;;道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性[J];心理学报;2017年02期
2 杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维;;权力的概念隐喻表征:来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J];心理学报;2015年07期
3 唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政;;权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角[J];心理学报;2015年04期
4 殷融;叶浩生;;道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响[J];心理学报;2014年09期
5 陈思思;克燕南;蒋奖;肖潇;;权力概念的垂直方位空间隐喻对权力判断的影响[J];心理科学;2014年02期
6 武悦;王爱平;蒋奖;古丽扎·伯克力;;启动任务中重量与权力的关系[J];心理学探新;2013年02期
7 殷融;苏得权;叶浩生;;具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论[J];心理科学进展;2013年02期
8 叶浩生;;有关具身认知思潮的理论心理学思考[J];心理学报;2011年05期
9 吴念阳;刘慧敏;郝静;杨辰;;空间意象图式在时空隐喻理解中的作用[J];心理科学;2010年02期
10 陈燕;黄希庭;;时间隐喻研究述评[J];心理科学进展;2006年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 马玉俊;隐喻理解加工策略的选择机制[D];河南大学;2009年
，本文编号：2197806
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2197806.html
