4~6岁儿童在分配情境下的公平敏感性研究
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the fair sensitivity of children aged 4 to 6 years in distribution situations. Methods from April to July 2013, 108 children aged 4 to 6 years old from two kindergartens in Beijing were selected. The fair choice rate was investigated under the condition of anonymity, different cost conditions (no cost, low cost, high cost) and different degree of fairness (low unfair, high unfair), and at the same time, as the determinant and receiver of resource allocation. Results in the low unfair situation: at no cost, 4-year-old children did not show a preference for fairness (22 / 36, P 0.05), 5 or 6 years old children showed a preference for fairness (30 / 36, 30 / 36, P 0.05); at low cost, no preference for fairness was found among the 4- or 56-year-olds (13 / 36, 20 / 36, 20 / 36, 22 / 36, P 0.05); and at a high cost, a group of 45 or 45 years of age, at a high cost, showed no preference for fairness (13 / 36, 20 / 36, 20 / 36, 22 / 36, P / 05), while at a high cost, they showed a preference for fairness (30 / 36 / 36 / 36). Children showed no preference for fairness (6 / 36 / 8 / 36 / 6 P 0.05). 6 years old children did not show a preference for fairness (17 / 36% P 0.05). The fair choice rate of children aged 5 to 6 years was higher than that of 4 years old at no cost (P0.05), the fair choice rate of children aged 6 years old at low cost was higher than that of 4 years old, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05), and the fair choice rate of children aged 4 years old at high cost was lower than that of children aged 6 years old. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). In the high unfair situation: at no cost, the 4- year old did not show a preference for fairness (22 / 36 / 24 / 36 / 36) and the 6-year-old showed a preference for fairness (31 / 36 / 36 / 5); at low cost, none showed a preference for fairness (16 / 36 / 19 / 36 / 36 / 6); and at a high cost, a 4 year old child showed no preference for fairness (16 / 36 / 19 / 36 / 31 / 36 / 5); a 4 year old child at high cost showed a preference for fairness (16 / 36 / 19 / 36 / 31 / 36 P / 05); and at a high cost, a 4 year old child showed no preference for fairness. There was no preference for fairness (14 / 36 / 18 / 36 / 36) in 5-year-old children (4 / 36 / 3 / 6 P 0.05), and 5 / 36 years old children did not show a preference for fairness (14 / 36% / 36% P 0.05). The fair choice rate of children aged 6 years old at no cost was higher than that of children aged 4 to 5 years old, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05), there was no significant difference in the rate of fair choice of children aged 6 years old at low cost (P0.05), and the fair choice rate of children aged 4 years old at high cost was lower than that of children aged 5 to 6 years old. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion the fair sensitivity of 4- and 6-year-old children develops gradually with the increase of age. The cost, the cost and the degree of unfairness have influence on the fair behavior of 4- or 6-year-old children. The preference for fairness and the consideration of self-interest jointly determine the allocation decision of children. With the increase of children's age, the preference for equity gradually dominates.
【作者单位】: 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室中国科学院心理研究所;中国科学院大学;奥尔堡大学学习与哲学系;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(31000469)
【分类号】:B844.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 刘文;朱琳;张雪;张玉;刘颖;;2~3岁儿童在分配情境下的公平敏感性[J];心理学报;2015年11期
2 熊青;;社会不公平感与情绪状况[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2014年05期
3 于静;朱莉琪;;儿童公平行为的发展——来自博弈实验的证据[J];心理科学进展;2010年07期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈童;伍珍;;儿童的分配公平性:心理理论的作用[J];心理科学进展;2017年08期
2 贾艳红;施建农;张真;;4~6岁儿童在分配情境下的公平敏感性研究[J];中国全科医学;2017年22期
3 靳澎;施建农;张真;;面孔吸引力对学龄前儿童分配情境下公平行为的影响研究[J];中国全科医学;2017年14期
4 赵立军;李爽;刘永芳;;决策框架对教育公平判断、态度的影响研究[J];教育学术月刊;2017年04期
5 梁福成;王峥;王俊坤;唐卫海;;公正感研究述评[J];天津师范大学学报(社会科学版);2016年06期
6 郭庆科;徐萍;吴睿;胡姗姗;;群体偏好与年级对小学生利他惩罚行为的影响[J];心理发展与教育;2016年04期
7 余真;;不同类型虚拟内疚对于公平行为的影响[J];好家长;2016年04期
8 郝嘉佳;陈英和;;小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应[J];心理发展与教育;2015年06期
9 王雅青;;组织公平感的影响因素研究综述[J];邢台学院学报;2015年03期
10 陶塑;许燕;袁灿灿;;补偿性刻板印象激活对公平感的影响[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2015年04期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘文;朱琳;温国旗;;分配情境下的婴幼儿公平敏感性[J];心理科学进展;2014年04期
2 辛彗;郭黎岩;;女大学生就业压力与社会公平感的研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2012年06期
3 马磊;刘欣;;中国城市居民的分配公平感研究[J];社会学研究;2010年05期
4 吕晓俊;;社会公平感形成的心理机制研究述评[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年03期
5 方富熹;Henry M. Wellman;刘玉娟;刘国雄;亢蓉;;纵向再探学前儿童心理理论发展模式[J];心理学报;2009年08期
6 樊召锋;俞国良;刘聪慧;;心理痛苦研究述评——聚焦5·12汶川大地震受灾群众心理痛苦[J];心理科学进展;2009年03期
7 怀默霆;;中国民众如何看待当前的社会不平等[J];社会学研究;2009年01期
8 王彦;苏彦捷;;5至8岁儿童心理理论各成分的发展及其关系[J];北京大学学报(自然科学版);2008年04期
9 朱莉琪;皇甫刚;M.Keller;牟毅;陈单枝;;从博弈游戏看儿童经济决策行为的发展[J];心理学报;2008年04期
10 张香萍;张军;;新闻传媒对大众社会公平感的消极影响与纠正[J];中国广播;2007年11期
,本文编号:2239296
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2239296.html