分类对厌恶评估的影响
发布时间：2019-04-10 16:42
【摘要】：厌恶是人类基本的情绪之一，具有防止疾病感染、回避社会弊病的作用。了解厌恶的产生对人们日常生活十分重要。Rozin等人提出的厌恶评估机制解释了厌恶产生的过程，强调厌恶是一种让人产生“污染”想法的情绪。 人类学家Douglas提出了禁忌文化，强调人们对肮脏与纯洁的判断，人们本能地害怕被肮脏的事物所污染。肮脏的事物是带有污染性的，是让人觉得恶心和讨厌的。Douglas又阐述了关于肮脏和分类系统的观点。人们对于肮脏和纯洁的判断是基于宗教社会的分类系统以及个人的分类行为。Rozin和Douglas都强调“污染”想法是产生厌恶的必要条件。结合两者观点，分类行为或者分类倾向是否会对厌恶评估产生影响？ 本研究旨在通过三个实证研究探究分类行为和分类倾向是否会对厌恶评估产生影响。研究一是探索性的相关研究，探究厌恶敏感性与分类倾向之间的相关性，为研究二和研究三做好实证准备。研究二通过实验启动的方式，探究不同分类倾向（高分类倾向和低分类倾向）是否会对厌恶评估产生影响。研究三探究分类行为是否会对厌恶评估产生影响。 研究获得以下主要结论： （1）厌恶敏感性和分类倾向具有很大程度的关联，说明两者之间是彼此联系，相互影响的。 （2）不同的分类倾向对厌恶评估的影响存在显著性差异。具体而言，高分类倾向的被试厌恶评分高，，低分类倾向的被试厌恶评分低，两者具有显著性差异。 （3）分类行为对厌恶评估的影响存在显著性影响。
[Abstract]:Aversion is one of the basic emotions of human beings. It has the function of preventing disease infection and avoiding social ills. Understanding the emergence of aversion is very important to people's daily lives. Rozin et al.'s aversion assessment mechanism explains the process of aversion, emphasizing that aversion is an emotion that creates "polluting" ideas. Anthropologist Douglas proposed a culture of taboo, emphasizing people's judgment of filth and purity, and instinctive fear of being tainted by dirty things. Filthy things are polluting, disgusting and annoying. Douglas also sets forth the idea of dirty and classified systems. People's judgment of filth and purity is based on the classification system of religious society and the classification of individuals. Rozin and Douglas both emphasize that "pollution" is a necessary condition for aversion. Combined with the two points of view, will classification behavior or classification tendency have an impact on the assessment of aversion? The purpose of this study is to explore whether classification behavior and classification tendency have an impact on aversion assessment through three empirical studies. The first is exploratory related research to explore the correlation between aversion sensitivity and classification tendency, and prepare for the second and third research. The second study explores whether different classification tendencies (high classification tendency and low classification tendency) have an impact on aversion assessment. The third study explores whether classified behavior has an impact on aversion assessment. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the sensitivity of aversion and the tendency to classify are related to each other to a great extent, indicating that the two are interrelated and influenced each other. (2) there were significant differences in the influence of different classification tendencies on aversion assessment. Specifically, the subjects with high classification tendency had higher aversion score, and those with low classification tendency had lower aversion score, there was significant difference between the two groups. (3) the influence of classification behavior on aversion assessment was significant.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842
本文编号：2455955
[Abstract]:Aversion is one of the basic emotions of human beings. It has the function of preventing disease infection and avoiding social ills. Understanding the emergence of aversion is very important to people's daily lives. Rozin et al.'s aversion assessment mechanism explains the process of aversion, emphasizing that aversion is an emotion that creates "polluting" ideas. Anthropologist Douglas proposed a culture of taboo, emphasizing people's judgment of filth and purity, and instinctive fear of being tainted by dirty things. Filthy things are polluting, disgusting and annoying. Douglas also sets forth the idea of dirty and classified systems. People's judgment of filth and purity is based on the classification system of religious society and the classification of individuals. Rozin and Douglas both emphasize that "pollution" is a necessary condition for aversion. Combined with the two points of view, will classification behavior or classification tendency have an impact on the assessment of aversion? The purpose of this study is to explore whether classification behavior and classification tendency have an impact on aversion assessment through three empirical studies. The first is exploratory related research to explore the correlation between aversion sensitivity and classification tendency, and prepare for the second and third research. The second study explores whether different classification tendencies (high classification tendency and low classification tendency) have an impact on aversion assessment. The third study explores whether classified behavior has an impact on aversion assessment. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the sensitivity of aversion and the tendency to classify are related to each other to a great extent, indicating that the two are interrelated and influenced each other. (2) there were significant differences in the influence of different classification tendencies on aversion assessment. Specifically, the subjects with high classification tendency had higher aversion score, and those with low classification tendency had lower aversion score, there was significant difference between the two groups. (3) the influence of classification behavior on aversion assessment was significant.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 张中学;宋娟;;偏见研究的进展[J];心理与行为研究;2007年02期
2 张莹瑞;佐斌;;社会认同理论及其发展[J];心理科学进展;2006年03期
3 阎书昌;;身体洁净与道德[J];心理科学进展;2011年08期
4 吴宝沛;张雷;;厌恶与道德判断的关系[J];心理科学进展;2012年02期
本文编号：2455955
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2455955.html
