绘人人格测验解释与评分系统的理论述评

发布时间：2018-01-07 01:14

  本文关键词：绘人人格测验解释与评分系统的理论述评　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

  更多相关文章： 绘人人格测验 投射测验 人格评估 身体意象理论

【摘要】：绘人测验与主题统觉测验、罗夏墨迹测验并称为三大投射测验。绘人测验作为投射测验的典型代表,一方面被心理咨询和临床实践者经常使用,并且被认为是一个可以辅助对来访者进行诊断与治疗的有效工具,另一方面又饱受实证主义者的质疑,认为其存在测量结果难以量化,在传统心理测量的信度和效度指标上的结果不理想,理论基础难以证伪等问题。这就导致在实践者群体中对绘人测验的临床应用经验较为丰富,但是在学术文献中对绘人测验的研究却出现相对匮乏的现状。迄今为止,对绘人测验的应用研究被划分为两种取向:一种取向将绘人测验应用于儿童智力发展状况的测量。另一种取向将绘人测验应用于对人格的评估及心理问题的诊断。绘人智力测验凭借其可量化和具有发展常模等优势,被广泛的应用于学术研究和实践应用中,已经积累了相对丰富的研究成果。但是,在对绘人人格测验的研究中,由于缺乏对绘人人格测验的理论介绍和实践有效性的探讨,因此,该研究取向较少受到学术研究的理论关注。本研究立足于在对绘人人格测验的理论进行系统梳理的基础上,重点选取两类典型的绘人人格测验,马科瓦绘人人格测验和科皮茨绘人人格测验,分别作为绘人人格测验质性体系建构和量化体系建构的代表。对其理论基础、施测方法、解释系统和评估指标进行系统的介绍,并对这两种取向各自的优势与不足进行比较性的分析和理论述评,最后对绘人人格测验的发展方向进行评价与展望。本研究力求在理论上,为绘人人格测验研究的理论发展与实证研究提供文献支持和研究展望,在实践上,为绘人人格测验的本土应用提供理论指导和参照资料。我们可以相信,以上工作不仅有助于推进对绘人人格测验的学术研究,还有助于发现已有绘人人格测验应用中的问题,为完善绘人人格测验的应用提供实践上的指导。
[Abstract]:Drawing test and thematic apperception test, Rorschach ink test as three major projection test. As a typical representative of projection test, on the one hand, it is often used by psychological counseling and clinical practitioners. And it is considered to be an effective tool to assist the diagnosis and treatment of visitors. On the other hand, it has been questioned by the positists that its existence measurement results are difficult to quantify. The results of traditional psychological measurement on reliability and validity are not ideal, and the theoretical basis is difficult to be falsified, which leads to rich experience in clinical application of pictorial test in the community of practitioners. However, in the academic literature, there is a relative lack of research on pictorial testing. So far. The research on the application of pictorial test is divided into two orientations:. One is to apply the drawing person test to the measurement of children's intelligence development, the other is to apply the drawing person test to the assessment of personality and the diagnosis of psychological problems. Model and other advantages. Has been widely used in academic research and practical applications, has accumulated relatively rich research results. However, in the study of personality mapping test. Due to the lack of theoretical introduction and practical effectiveness of personality mapping test, therefore. The research orientation is less concerned by academic research. This study is based on the systematic combing of the theory of personality drawing personality test, focusing on the selection of two types of typical personality drawing personality test. As the representative of the construction of the qualitative system and the quantitative system, the Macovar drawing Personality Test and the Coppertz Personality drawing Personality Test are respectively used as the theoretical basis and the testing method for the construction of the qualitative system and the quantitative system of the Personality drawing Test. The system of explanation and evaluation are introduced systematically, and the comparative analysis and theoretical review of the advantages and disadvantages of the two orientations are made. Finally, the development direction of personality mapping test is evaluated and prospected. This study aims to provide literature support and research prospect for the theoretical development and empirical research of personality mapping test in theory and practice. To provide theoretical guidance and reference materials for the local application of personality mapping test, we can believe that the above work is not only helpful to promote the academic research of personality mapping test. It is also helpful to find out the problems in the application of the personality drawing test and to provide practical guidance for the improvement of the application of the personality drawing test.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B848
，

本文编号：1390340