汉英初级第二语言口语教材编写设计对比分析

发布时间：2018-01-07 12:34

本文关键词：汉英初级第二语言口语教材编写设计对比分析　出处：《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：汉语作为第二语言教学的目标是培养学习者运用语言进行交际的能力,而交际便离不开口头表达,因此口语课在学习者的学习过程中占据着不容忽视的地位。要想上好一门口语课离不开优秀的口语教材,教材是教师教学和学生学习所依据的材料,对课程的好坏起着十分关键的作用。而初级口语教材作为大多数学习者最初接触一门语言时所使用的教材,对于学习者语言习惯和兴趣的形成更是有着非同一般的影响力。近年来,针对口语教材的研究很多,但将对外汉语口语教材与英语口语教材放在一起进行对比的研究还较为少见。事实上,英语作为第二语言教育在我国开始早、发展成熟,其教材编写设计也有很多值得我们对外汉语教材学习和借鉴的地方;而对外汉语教材其自身的一些优势和特点,也应得到进一步的保持和强化,对于英语教材也有一定的参考价值。因此,将二者放在一起进行编写设计方面的对比分析,对于二者各自的进一步发展都有一定的帮助。本文便选取了《初级汉语口语1》(以下简称《初1》)和《剑桥国际英语口语速成1》(以下简称《剑1》)两本汉英初级第二语言口语教材进行对比分析,以期得出更多不同于以往的结论。本文共分为七个章节。第一章是绪论,简单介绍了本文的选题缘起、选题意义并对本文涉及到的几个概念做了界定。第二章,笔者介绍了汉英第二语言口语教材的编写情况和研究现状,并对本文所选的两本教材——《初1》和《剑1》的基本情况做了简述。第三、四、五章是本文的重要章节,在这章中,笔者从编写框架设计、编写内容设计和编写练习设计三个部分对两本教材进行了对比分析。编写框架设计包括编写体例和每课/单元环节设置分析;编写内容设计部分包括课文、话题、注释和翻译以及文化补充知识的对比分析;编写练习设计部分则分为了练习题量和练习题型两方面的对比分析。在每个部分之后,笔者都针对这一部分的对比做出了结论,并总结出了两本教材可以互相借鉴的地方。在第六章中,笔者将以上每一部分的结论进行了汇总,分析并总结出了两本教材分别的优势和不足。将全文进行了梳理总结,分析了本文的研究价值及不足之处,并对下一步研究提出了建议。
[Abstract]:The goal of Chinese as a second language teaching is to cultivate learners' communicative competence in the use of language, and communication cannot be separated from oral expression. Therefore, oral English course plays an important role in the process of learners' learning. If we want to get a good oral course, we can not do without excellent oral teaching materials. The teaching material is the basis for teachers' teaching and students' learning. The primary oral teaching materials are used by most learners when they first come into contact with a language. In recent years, there has been a lot of research on spoken language teaching materials, which has an extraordinary influence on the formation of learners' language habits and interests. In fact, English as a second language education in China began to develop early and mature. The compilation and design of its teaching materials also have a lot of worthy for us to learn and learn from the Chinese teaching materials as a foreign language; Some of the advantages and characteristics of teaching materials as a foreign language should be further maintained and strengthened, which has a certain reference value for English teaching materials. Put the two together for a comparative analysis of writing design. This paper selects "Primary spoken Chinese 1" (hereinafter referred to as "< first 1 > >)" and < Cambridge International Oral English 1 > > (hereinafter referred to as "Jian 1 >"). A comparative analysis is made between the two spoken Chinese and English primary second language textbooks. This paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is an introduction, briefly introduces the origin of this topic, the significance of the topic and the definition of several concepts involved in this paper. Chapter two. The author introduces the compilation and research status of spoken English textbooks in Chinese and English, and gives a brief account of the basic situation of the two textbooks selected in this paper: < beginning 1 > and < Jian 1 >. Third, fourth. Five chapters are important chapters of this paper, in this chapter, the author from the writing framework design. The three parts of writing content design and writing exercise design have carried on the contrast analysis to the two textbooks. The writing frame design includes writing style and setting analysis of each class / unit; The content design part includes text, topic, annotation and translation, as well as comparative analysis of cultural supplementary knowledge. The part of writing exercises design is divided into exercise volume and exercise type of two aspects of comparative analysis. After each part, the author has made a conclusion on the comparison of this part. And summed up the two textbooks can learn from each other. In the 6th chapter, the author summarized the conclusions of each part above. This paper analyzes and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the two textbooks, combs and summarizes the full text, analyzes the research value and deficiency of this paper, and puts forward some suggestions for the next research.
【学位授予单位】：北京外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H195.4

【参考文献】