河姆渡文化分期研究

发布时间：2018-01-31 20:52

本文关键词： 河姆渡文化肩脊釜绳纹文化交流文化源流　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：河姆渡文化,是发现于上世纪70年代的一支长江下游地区新石器时代的考古学文化,其大致分布区域为杭州湾以南的宁绍地区到舟山群岛一带,尤以姚江流域的遗址分布最为集中。一直以来,有关河姆渡文化的研究主要集中于河姆渡遗址本身文化性质,尤其是第三、四层文化性质的探讨,而关于河姆渡文化的整体性研究相对缺少。随着近年来傅家山、田螺山等一批新遗址的相继发现和发掘,为进一步分析和研究河姆渡文化提供了充足的考古学材料。为此,以现有的这些材料为出发点,本文对河姆渡文化的分期、与周邻考古学文化的关系,以及其源流问题进行了重新探讨,以期对河姆渡文化有一个相对明确的认识和解读。本文的结构共分为五章。第一章:绪论介绍河姆渡文化的时空范围,并就目前的研究现状和研究成果作了一个简短的梳理,概括了河姆渡文化自发现以来四十余年来的研究历程,并引出文章的写作目的和写作方向。第二章:河姆渡文化的分期与年代从层位明确、遗物相对丰富的河姆渡遗址出发,通过地层学及类型学的对比分析,总结河姆渡遗址典型陶器在各个发展阶段的演变序列,将其分为四期六段。进而通过比对其他遗址的器物,进行横向连接,总结出河姆渡文化整体的发展动态。第三章:河姆渡文化与周临考古学文化的关系主要讨论河姆渡文化与浙北苏南地区马家浜文化、崧泽文化的关系。通过典型陶器的对比,得出河姆渡文化早期阶段较多影响马家浜文化、晚期阶段则受到马家浜文化和崧泽文化单向渗透的结论。第四章:河姆渡文化的源流相关探讨河姆渡文化的源流应从本地区入手,近年来发现的跨湖桥文化和上山文化是切入点。通过对比河姆渡文化与跨湖桥文化的陶器组合与器物特征,得出跨湖桥文化与河姆渡文化之间差异性远远大于相似性,二者并不属于同一文化系统。第五章:结语概括前文写作得出的相关结论,对河姆渡文化的分期、与周邻考古学关系,以及源流问题进行了简短的总结。
[Abstract]:Hemudu culture is a Neolithic archaeological culture found in -30s in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Its distribution region is from Ningshao area to Zhoushan Islands south of Hangzhou Bay. In particular, the most concentrated site distribution in the Yao River basin. All along, the research on the Hemudu culture is mainly focused on the cultural nature of the site itself, especially the third and fourth levels of cultural nature. With the discovery and excavation of some new sites such as Fujiashan and Tianluoshan in recent years, the research on the integrity of Hemudu culture is relatively lacking. Sufficient archaeological materials are provided for further analysis and study of Hemudu culture. Therefore, based on the existing materials, this paper divides the culture of Hemudu into stages and its relationship with the archaeological culture of neighboring Zhou. In order to have a relatively clear understanding and interpretation of Hemudu culture, the structure of this paper is divided into five chapters. Chapter one: introduction introduces the space-time scope of Hemudu culture. And the current research status and research results made a brief comb, summarized since the discovery of Hemudu culture since the discovery of more than 40 years of research process. The second chapter: the period and age of Hemudu culture from the clear horizon, relatively rich relics of the site, through stratigraphy and typology comparative analysis. Summarize the evolution sequence of typical pottery in each stage of development, divide it into four stages and six sections, and then compare the artifacts of other sites for horizontal connection. The third chapter: the relationship between Hemudu culture and Zhou Lin archaeological culture mainly discusses the culture of Hemudu and the Majiabang culture in the south of Jiangsu province in the north of Zhejiang. Through the comparison of typical pottery, it is concluded that the early stage of Hemudu culture has more influence on Majiabang culture. In the late stage, the Majiabang culture and Songze culture were infiltrated unidirectionally. Chapter 4th: the origin and flow of Hemudu culture should be started from this region. The cross-lake bridge culture and the mountain culture discovered in recent years are the breakthrough point. By comparing the pottery combination and the ware characteristics between the Hemudu culture and the cross-lake bridge culture. It is concluded that the difference between the culture of cross-lake bridge and the culture of Hemudu is far greater than the similarity, and they do not belong to the same cultural system. Chapter 5th: the conclusion of the conclusion summarized above, the period of the culture of Hemudu. The relationship with Zhou Ling archaeology, as well as the origin of the problem were briefly summarized.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：K878

【参考文献】