实验哲学的路径与论辩研究

发布时间:2018-04-20 03:00

  本文选题:实验哲学 + 直觉 ; 参考:《南京理工大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:实验哲学是21世纪初从西方兴起的,虽然发展时间不长,但它在西方哲学界引起了强烈的反响。一方面,它为研究哲学提供了一种新的思路和方法。哲学家们设计哲学场景制成问卷,采用问卷调查及统计分析等方式获得大众关于某一哲学小场景的直觉,并以获得的经验数据为基础,或完善或质疑先前的哲学论断,或提出新的哲学研究视角,对哲学理论和方法的发展有其自身的意义。另一方面,实验哲学运用实验以及将大众直觉作为证据性材料的经验方法,不少哲学家认为这违背了哲学研究思辨分析的传统,其作为哲学研究方法的正当性受到了质疑。实验哲学家们重视这些质疑之声,并进行了不少回应和解释。本文解读、梳理和探讨了实验哲学研究的切入点、主要路径以及对其的质疑和辩护,希望达到对实验哲学更加客观全面的认识。实验哲学以直觉为研究的切入点,它与传统哲学关注的是不同的直觉主体,同时,在实验哲学下,直觉具有多样性。实验哲学的主要研究路径包括:自由意志和道德责任、知识归赋、诺布效应。对实验哲学的质疑和辩护主要表现在实验哲学的学科独立性、实验作为一种哲学研究方法的可靠性、实验哲学的研究切入点和研究结论等方面。目前,实验哲学呈现出新的研究视角,同时,它对其他学科的研究和发展也具有潜在价值。
[Abstract]:Experimental philosophy rose from the west in the early 21st century. Although it has not been developed for a long time, it has aroused a strong response in the western philosophy circles. On the one hand, it provides a new way to study philosophy. Philosophers design a questionnaire for philosophical scenes and obtain popular intuition about a small philosophical scene by means of questionnaires and statistical analysis, and based on the empirical data obtained, or by perfecting or challenging previous philosophical arguments. Or put forward a new philosophical research perspective, which has its own significance for the development of philosophical theory and methods. On the other hand, the use of experiments and the empirical method of using popular intuition as evidential materials in experimental philosophy is considered by many philosophers to be contrary to the tradition of speculative analysis of philosophical research, and its legitimacy as a method of philosophical research has been questioned. Experimental philosophers attach importance to these voices of doubt and respond and explain them. This paper interprets, combs and discusses the breakthrough point, the main path, the query and defense of the experimental philosophy, hoping to achieve a more objective and comprehensive understanding of the experimental philosophy. Experimental philosophy takes intuition as the starting point of research. It focuses on different intuitionistic subjects with traditional philosophy. At the same time, intuition is diverse in experimental philosophy. The main research paths of experimental philosophy include free will and moral responsibility, knowledge ascription, Norb effect. The challenge and defense of experimental philosophy are mainly reflected in the independence of experimental philosophy, the reliability of experiment as a philosophical research method, the research breakthrough point and conclusion of experimental philosophy, and so on. At present, experimental philosophy presents a new perspective of research, at the same time, it has potential value for the research and development of other disciplines.
【学位授予单位】:南京理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B08

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈增;;科学与哲学的融合——欧美实验哲学对我国的启示[J];未来与发展;2013年01期

2 张学义;陶迎春;;实验哲学:哲学工具箱里的助探器[J];科学技术哲学研究;2014年01期

3 张学义;;实验哲学:一场新的哲学变革[J];哲学动态;2011年11期

4 王汝发;;哲学实验与实验哲学[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

5 赵煦;;实验哲学研究的新视阈[J];科技导报;2012年03期

6 甄龙;;自由意志与当代实验哲学:回顾、反思与展望[J];未来与发展;2014年07期

7 周昌乐;;哲学实验:一种影响当代哲学走向的新方法[J];中国社会科学;2012年10期

8 阎康年;试论牛顿科学发现的社会背景[J];世界历史;1994年02期

9 郭U,

本文编号:1775920


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/1775920.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户19bb0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com