新时期文学理论教材与西方文论关系研究

发布时间:2018-06-29 04:43

  本文选题:文学理论教材 + 西方文论 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:文学理论课程是高校中文系汉语言文学专业的主干课程之一,文学理论教材是这个课程的重要的学习资料。文学理论教材的编写中的重要组成部分是西方文论,而新时期以来的文学理论教材对西方文论的吸收、批评并不是一成不变的,二者的关系呈现出一种变化过程。对二者关系进行研究,可以梳理出教材对西方文论吸收、批评的变化过程,分析出经验教训,落实到文学理论教材编写中,可以为未来教材的编写提供一些参考意见。研究文学理论教材与西方文论的关系,主要是看文学理论教材吸收了、批评了哪些理论;吸收的理论是小范围的观点式的,还是一种包容又深入的理论式、思潮式的。不过,我们的论述重点还是放在对西方文论的吸收上。因为我国文学理论教材对于西方文论整体态势上是包容与开放的,是以吸收、借鉴为主的;同时,作为教材,其本身就是提供给学生学习的资料,重心还是放在对西方文论的介绍上。从教材采用的标准、编写的方式、吸收西方文论的层面等几个方面进行分析后,可以大致归纳出新时期文学理论教材与西方文论呈现出的基本关系:由单一化到多维化,并不断深入化、深度化的发展过程。新时期以来的文学理论教材的编写,大多是有益的经验,但也存在一些不足,论文中分析出的经验与不足,可以为未来文学理论教材编写者提供参考。经验方面主要有:反本质主义思潮对教材编写的影响越来越深刻,文学理论上的基本问题的定义更加多元与开放;文学理论教材中的中国文论的主体性增强;在吸收西方文论时,更加适应了中国语境,中西方文论之间呈现出衔接与解释、汇通与融合的趋势;文学理论教材对于学生本体的关注更加明显,更加回归作为教材本身的作用。不足之处主要是对理应受到重视的作家文论的吸收呈现出减少的趋势。
[Abstract]:Literature theory course is one of the main courses of Chinese language and literature major in Chinese department of higher learning, and literature theory teaching material is the important study material of this course. The important component of the compilation of literary theory textbook is western literary theory, but in the new period, the literary theory textbook absorbs the western literary theory, the criticism is not invariable, the relationship between the two presents a kind of change process. By studying the relationship between the two, we can sort out the changing process of absorbing and criticizing the western literary theory, analyze the experience and lessons, put it into practice in the compilation of literary theory textbook, and provide some reference suggestions for the compilation of the future textbook. The study of the relationship between literary theory textbooks and western literary theories is mainly based on what theories have been absorbed and criticized in the textbooks of literary theory, and whether the absorbing theories are of a small range of viewpoints, or a kind of inclusive and deep theoretical and ideological patterns. However, our discussion focuses on the absorption of Western literary theory. Because the textbooks of Chinese literary theory are inclusive and open to the overall situation of western literary theory, and are mainly absorbed and used for reference. At the same time, as teaching materials, they themselves are the materials for students to learn. The focus is on the introduction of western literary theory. Based on the analysis of the standards used in the textbooks, the way of compiling and absorbing the level of western literary theory, the basic relationship between the textbooks of literary theory in the new period and western literary theories can be summed up: from singularity to multi-dimension. And continue to deepen, the development of the depth of the process. The compilation of literature theory textbooks since the new period is mostly beneficial experience, but there are also some shortcomings. The experience and deficiency analyzed in the paper can provide reference for the future writers of literary theory textbooks. Experience mainly includes: the influence of anti-essentialism on the compilation of textbooks is more and more profound, the definition of basic problems in literary theory is more diversified and open, the subjectivity of Chinese literary theory is strengthened in the textbooks of literary theory; In absorbing western literary theories, they are more adapted to the Chinese context, and there is a trend of convergence and interpretation, convergence and integration between Chinese and western literary theories, and the attention of literary theory textbooks to students' Noumenon is more obvious. More return to the role of the textbook itself. The deficiency is that the absorption of the writer's literary theory should be paid more attention.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I0

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张江;;强制阐释论[J];文学评论;2014年06期

2 朱立元;;试论后现代主义文论思潮在当代中国的积极影响[J];上海大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期

3 朱国华;;反本质主义文艺学教材的可能性[J];学海;2011年05期

4 胡亚敏;;后现代教学理念与研究型教材编写[J];文艺理论研究;2010年05期

5 曹顺庆;文彬彬;;多元的文学本质——对本质主义和建构主义论争的几点思考[J];文艺争鸣;2010年01期

6 陶东风;;文学理论:建构主义还是本质主义?——兼答支宇、吴炫、张旭春先生[J];文艺争鸣;2009年07期

7 汪正龙;;英美文学理论教材的现状与走向管窥——兼谈对我国文学理论教材改革的启示[J];江汉论坛;2009年06期

8 金永兵;马前;;文学理论“苏联模式”及其在新时期的价值变迁[J];文艺理论与批评;2008年05期

9 支宇;;对以群主编《文学的基本原理》(1964年版)的社会学反思[J];文艺研究;2008年09期

10 潘熹;;范式:中国化文论的建构——蔡仪《文学概论》的历史意义考察[J];社科纵横;2008年05期



本文编号:2080900

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/2080900.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户48d59***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com