纳博科夫与艾略特：形式主义关照下文学理论与文本实践的张力分析
发布时间：2018-10-12 21:18
【摘要】：通过对纳博科夫和艾略特的文学和非文学作品的细读,本文认为他们在各自的文学批评观点和文学作品中既重视文本的形式,又具有很强烈的历史意识。张力由此形成。纳博科夫深受俄国形式主义的影响,而艾略特是新批评的先驱。俄国形式主与新批评都属于形式主义,正是这条线索将两人联系起来。尽管形式主义理论尤其强调文本分析而不考虑文本之外的任何其他因素诸如作者的生平,写作背景和历史环境等,纳博科夫和艾略特从未忽视历史因素对于他们文学创作的影响。正相反,历史因素反而为他们的文学创作提供了不少动力。纳博科夫通过追溯过去认为历史是一个重要的元素,而艾略特在他的文章《传统与个人才能》里全面阐述了他的历史观,他认为没有诗人可以独立获得自己的意义。另外,艾略特在文学作品中的旁征博引、引经据典也体现出他强烈的历史意识。为了打破学界对于形式主义文学理论家只重文本分析忽视文本之外其他因素的这种误解,本文选取了纳博科夫的五部短篇小说和艾略特的《普鲁弗洛克的情歌》,通过分析纳博科夫与艾略特文学理论与文本实践的张力,换句话说,就是文学与非文学作品,认为他们文学影响的伟大之处就在于把形式主义技巧和历史质素结合在一起形成了一种张力。这种张力的存在才是文学作品之所以成为能够经典的核心之处。
[Abstract]:Through a close reading of Nabokov and Eliot's literary and non-literary works, this paper holds that they attach importance to the form of the text as well as a strong historical consciousness in their respective literary critical views and literary works. Tension is thus formed. Nabokov was deeply influenced by Russian formalism, and Eliot was the pioneer of new criticism. Russian formalism and new criticism belong to formalism, and it is this clue that connects the two. Although formalistic theory places particular emphasis on text analysis and does not take into account any other factors other than the text, such as the author's life, writing background and historical environment, Nabokov and Eliot never ignore the influence of historical factors on their literary creation. On the contrary, historical factors provide a lot of impetus for their literary creation. Nabokov thinks that history is an important element by tracing back to the past, while Eliot fully expounds his view of history in his essay tradition and individual Talent. He believes that no poet can gain his own meaning independently. In addition, Eliot's allusions and quotations in literary works also reflect his strong sense of history. In order to break the academic misunderstanding that formalistic literary theorists only emphasize text analysis and ignore other factors beyond the text, This paper selects Nabokov's five short stories and Eliot's Prufrok's Love songs to analyze the tension between Nabokov and Eliot's literary theory and text practice, in other words, literary and non-literary works. The great point of their literary influence is that the combination of formalism and historical quality forms a tension. The existence of this tension is the core of the classical literature.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I106.4
[Abstract]:Through a close reading of Nabokov and Eliot's literary and non-literary works, this paper holds that they attach importance to the form of the text as well as a strong historical consciousness in their respective literary critical views and literary works. Tension is thus formed. Nabokov was deeply influenced by Russian formalism, and Eliot was the pioneer of new criticism. Russian formalism and new criticism belong to formalism, and it is this clue that connects the two. Although formalistic theory places particular emphasis on text analysis and does not take into account any other factors other than the text, such as the author's life, writing background and historical environment, Nabokov and Eliot never ignore the influence of historical factors on their literary creation. On the contrary, historical factors provide a lot of impetus for their literary creation. Nabokov thinks that history is an important element by tracing back to the past, while Eliot fully expounds his view of history in his essay tradition and individual Talent. He believes that no poet can gain his own meaning independently. In addition, Eliot's allusions and quotations in literary works also reflect his strong sense of history. In order to break the academic misunderstanding that formalistic literary theorists only emphasize text analysis and ignore other factors beyond the text, This paper selects Nabokov's five short stories and Eliot's Prufrok's Love songs to analyze the tension between Nabokov and Eliot's literary theory and text practice, in other words, literary and non-literary works. The great point of their literary influence is that the combination of formalism and historical quality forms a tension. The existence of this tension is the core of the classical literature.
【学位授予单位】：西安外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I106.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨国政;法国举办各种活动纪念纳博科夫诞辰100周年[J];国外文学;2000年01期
2 刘佳林;纳博科夫研究及翻译述评[J];外国文学评论;2004年02期
3 谭少茹;;纳博科夫文学思想研究[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年01期
4 赵君;;探寻“现实”的本真内涵——论纳博科夫“后现代式”现实观[J];外国文学评论;2008年04期
5 陈辉;;涅i迷偕朕限尉秤，
本文编号：2267628
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/2267628.html
教材专著
