三种文体写作中语言复杂性与准确性关系研究

发布时间：2020-12-03 14:51

　　本研究基于权衡假说和认知假说,使用定量和定性方法,对东北某大学119位大二学生的议论文、记叙文和描写文进行了研究,探索三种文体作文中的语言复杂性和语言准确性之间的关系。本研究使用相关分析和逐步回归分析分别对三种文体的语言复杂性和语言准确性之间的关系进行了考察。使用单因素方差分析,探究了文体因素对语言复杂性和语言准确性关系的影响。研究发现:(1)议论文中语言复杂性和语言准确性之间呈显著负相关,二者之间相互竞争。(2)记叙文中语言复杂性和语言准确性之间呈显著负相关,存在竞争关系。(3)描写文中语言复杂性和语言准确性之间相互竞争,呈显著负相关。(4)从总体上看,议论文的句法结构最复杂,但其语言准确性最低;记叙文的词汇种类最多,但其语言准确性较低;描写文的语言错误最少,但其语言复杂性整体最低;同一文体的语言复杂性在一定程度上可以预测相同文体的语言准确性。在理论上,本研究为竞争假说提供了实证支持,拓宽了相关研究视野,丰富了二语写作研究的多样性。在教学上,本研究结果可以帮助教师及时调整教学策略,提高学生语言产出的质量。此外,教师根据学生不同文体语言的特点,为学生提供支架,帮助其掌握跨文体写作的技能... 

【文章来源】：大连海事大学辽宁省 211工程院校

【文章页数】：81 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research purpose and significance
    1.3 Layout of the thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Trade-off Hypothesis
        2.1.1 Introduction to the Trade-off Hypothesis
        2.1.2 Empirical studies relevant to the Trade-off Hypothesis
    2.2 The Cognition Hypothesis
        2.2.1 Introduction to the Cognition Hypothesis
        2.2.2 Empirical studies based on the Cognition Hypothesis
    2.3 Genre
        2.3.1 Definitions of genre
        2.3.2 Classifications of genres
        2.3.3 Previous research on L2 writing across genres
    2.4 Linguistic dimensions of language performance
        2.4.1 Definitions and measures of the linguistic complexity and accuracy
        2.4.2 Previous empirical studies on linguistic dimensions
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Instruments
        3.2.1Data analyzing software
        3.2.2 Measures of linguistic complexity and accuracy
    3.3 Data collection procedures
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 Relationship between linguistic complexity and accuracy in the argumentative essays204.1.1 Relationship between syntactic complexity and accuracy in the argumentativeessays
        4.1.1 Relationship between syntactic complexity and accuracy in the argumentativeessays
        4.1.2 Relationship between lexical complexity and accuracy in the argumentative essays
        4.1.3 Regression analysis of linguistic complexity and accuracy in the argumentativessays
        4.1.4 Discussion
    4.2 Relationship between linguistic complexity and accuracy in the narrative essays
        4.2.1 Relationship between syntactic complexity and accuracy in the narrative essays
        4.2.2 Relationship between lexical complexity and accuracy in the narrative essays
        4.2.3 Regression analysis of linguistic complexity and accuracy in the narrative essays
        4.2.4 Discussion
    4.3 Relationship between linguistic complexity and accuracy in the descriptive essays
        4.3.1 Relationship between syntactic complexity and accuracy in the descriptive essays
        4.3.2 Relationship between lexical complexity and accuracy in the descriptive essays
        4.3.3 Regression analysis of linguistic complexity and accuracy in the descriptive essays
        4.3.4 Discussion
    4.4 Effect of genres on language performance in terms of linguistic complexity andaccuracy
    4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings
    5.2 Implications of the current study
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
Resume


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]任务前与任务中时间条件对基于视频的二语写作绩效的影响[J]. 李玖,王建华.  外语与外语教学. 2019(01)
[2]认知要求对学习者口语产出质量与注意分配的影响[J]. 徐锦芬,陈聪.  外语与外语教学. 2018(06)
[3]任务重复对学术英语写作的影响:以动态系统理论为视角[J]. 雷鹏飞,徐锦芬.  外语界. 2018(05)
[4]高水平学习者语言复杂度的多维发展研究[J]. 郑咏滟.  外语教学与研究. 2018(02)
[5]书面纠正性反馈作用下的英语写作复杂度发展研究[J]. 吴雪峰.  外语研究. 2017(06)
[6]任务复杂度对二语写作效应的Meta分析——基于RevMan的报告[J]. 李玖,王建华.  外语界. 2017(05)
[7]合作产出对英语学习者书面语准确性发展的影响研究[J]. 桑紫林.  外语与外语教学. 2017(04)
[8]基于复杂理论的英语学习者口语复杂度、准确度、流利度发展研究[J]. 李茶,隋铭才.  外语教学与研究. 2017(03)
[9]任务类型对汉语二语口语产出中词汇复杂度的影响[J]. 刘瑜.  世界汉语教学. 2017(02)
[10]学习者句法与词汇复杂性发展的动态系统研究[J]. 郑咏滟,冯予力.  现代外语. 2017(01)



本文编号：2896375