从把关理论看联络口译中译员的主体性

发布时间：2021-08-12 16:01

　　联络口译是重要的口译类别,但是相关研究,尤其是针对联络译员主体性的研究却并不充分。作者基于此期望借传播学的把关理论来对联络口译员的主体性,尤其是受动性,进行较为充分的跨学科研究。本文首先从把关和口译的本质、把关和口译的模式、把关人和口译员的作用和作用效果、两者的主体性,即主动和受动性,四个方面论证将把关理论引入联络口译研究的合理性。通过理论分析发现,把关人和译员同为信息传播者,译员亦为把关人。把关理论指出,把关人通过选择和加工消息来形成新闻;同时,把关人并不是任意加工,他们受到五个层级的因素的限制。通过口译转录文本和理论研究,本文发现联络口译员和把关人类似,在受制于多重因素的基础上积极筛选和整合信息来表现主体性,即拥有充分的受动性以及主动性。本文借用Shoemaker的五层把关理论,即把关人在个人、传播惯例、组织、媒体外及制度、社会环境五个层面把关,来证明并分析译员的受动性和相应的主动性,并较为系统地整合译员在受动性基础上的主动性的表现:调整、省略、添加和确认信息。其中,调整和省略与把关人的行为具有相似性。最终得出结论,联络口译员基于不同层级的限制因素,调整、省略、添加和确认信息来表现... 

【文章来源】：上海外国语大学上海市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：80 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background and Significance of the Research
    1.2 Methodology of the Research
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies on Interpreting and Translation from the Perspective of Communication Science
    2.2 Previous Studies on Liaison Interpreter’s Subjectivity
    2.3 Previous Studies on Gatekeeping Theory
    2.4 Previous Studies on Subjectivity of Liaison Interpreter from the Perspective of Gatekeeping
Chapter Three Gatekeeping Theory
    3.1 Introduction of Gatekeeping Theory
        3.1.1 The Development of Gatekeeping Theory
        3.1.2 Gatekeeper’s Subjectivity:Passivity and Activity
    3.2 The Feasibility of Applying Gatekeeping to Liaison Interpreter Study
        3.2.1 Nature of Interpreting and Gatekeeping
        3.2.2 Models of Interpreting and Gatekeeping
        3.2.3 Function and Effect of Interpreting and Gatekeeping
        3.2.4 Subjectivity of Interpreter and Gatekeeper
Chapter Four Subjectivity of Liaison Interpreter from the Perspective of Gatekeeping
    4.1 Subjectivity From Perspectives of Philosophy,Translation and Interpreting
    4.2 Liaison Interpreting
    4.3 Subjectivity of Liaison Interpreter:Passivity and Activity
    4.4 Five-Layer Analysis of Gatekeeping
    4.5 Manifestations of Passivity in Five Layers
        4.5.1 Individual Level
        4.5.2 Communication Routine Level
        4.5.3 Organizational Level
        4.5.4 Extra media,Social/institutional Level
        4.5.5 Social System Level
    4.6 Manifestations of Activity Generalized
        4.6.1 Adaptation
        4.6.2 Omission
        4.6.3 Addition
        4.6.4 Confirmation
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Research
    5.2 Implications of the Research
        5.2.1 Pedagogical Implications
        5.2.2 Interpreting Implications
    5.3 Limitations
    5.4 Suggestions for Future Studies
References
Appendix
    Appendix 1
    Appendix 2



本文编号：3338626