跨文化视角下中美家庭成员道歉策略使用比较研究
发布时间:2021-11-19 00:25
道歉策略被广泛应用于修复人际关系及维持和睦气氛。不同的文化背景下,人们对道歉策略的使用存在异同,其原因可以用Hofstede的文化维度理论来解释。然而,针对不同国家不同辈分的家庭成员使用道歉策略的研究并不多。因此,本研究旨在探究国家、性别与辈分差异如何影响家庭成员对道歉策略的选择,并以此为跨文化交际及英语学习提供建议。基于Olshtain(1989)对道歉策略的分类与Hofstede(2010)的文化维度理论,本研究提出四个研究问题:第一,在《家有儿女》与《摩登家庭》中,家庭成员在道歉策略的总体使用上有哪些异同?第二,在这两部情景喜剧中,男女家庭成员在道歉策略的使用上有哪些异同?第三,在这两部电视剧中,三种不同类型的家庭关系(长辈对晚辈,晚辈对长辈,以及平辈之间)在道歉策略的使用上有什么异同?第四,根据Hofstede的文化维度理论,上述三个研究问题的结果产生的原因有哪些?研究过程分为三步。第一步,观看电视剧,并记录道歉场景的细节。第二步,计算各个道歉策略的发生次数,并将数据整理成表格。第三步,比较数据并分析对话。比较中美家庭成员使用道歉策略的整体比例,以及不同性别及不同辈分间中美家庭...
【文章来源】:山东大学山东省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】:89 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Objective of the Study
1.3 Significance of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Apology Strategies
2.1.1 Definition of apology strategies
2.1.2 Classification of apology strategies
2.1.3 Previous Studies of apology strategies
2.2 Cultural Dimensions
2.2.1 Development of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.2.2 Summary of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.2.3 Previous Studies of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.3 Research Gaps and Research Questions
2.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
3.1 Sources of Data
3.2 Data Selection
3.3 Data Processing and Analysis
3.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Four Research Results
4.1 Overall Comparison of Apology Strategy Use in Home with Kids and Modern Family
4.2 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Gender
4.2.1 Strategies used by Chinese males and females
4.2.2 Strategies used by American males and females
4.2.3 Strategies used by different genders in the two countries
4.3 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Generations
4.3.1 Strategies used by different generations in Chinese
4.3.2 Strategies used by different generations in English
4.3.3 Strategies used by different generations in the two countries
Chapter Five Discussions about the Possible Reasons for Research Results
5.1 Overall Comparison of Apology Strategy Use in Home with Kids and Modern Family
5.2 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Gender
5.2.1 Strategies used by Chinese males and females
5.2.2 Strategies used by American males and females
5.2.3 Strategies used by different genders in the two countries
5.3 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Generations
5.3.1 Strategies used by different generations in Chinese
5.3.2 Strategies used by different generations in English
5.3.3 Strategies used by different generations in the two countries
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of this Study
6.2 Implications
6.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study
References
Acknowledgements
学位论文评阅及答辩情况表
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]近十年国际跨文化传播研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 史兴松,徐文娟,单晓晖. 全球传媒学刊. 2019(04)
[2]基于语料库探讨中国企业英文网站的跨文化适应水平[J]. 史兴松,单晓晖. 中国外语. 2019(02)
[3]当代中国礼貌观的地域差异研究——以致歉行为为例[J]. 邓兆红,邱佳. 外语研究. 2019(01)
[4]霍夫斯泰德文化维度理论在中国跨文化传播研究中的应用[J]. 马兴祥,王欣芳. 当代传播. 2018(06)
[5]基于文化维度理论的留学生跨文化适应性研究——以留学德国半年以上的77名中国学生为例[J]. 谢琼,戚一娇. 北京第二外国语学院学报. 2018(05)
[6]中美政治道歉言语行为对比研究[J]. 刘风光,邓耀臣,肇迎如. 外语与外语教学. 2016(06)
[7]显性教学对高中英语学习者语用能力发展的实证研究[J]. 杨昆,毛延生. 教学与管理. 2016(27)
[8]《论语》的文化维度与翻译策略[J]. 范敏. 天津外国语大学学报. 2015(05)
[9]课堂引导提高英语道歉策略运用能力的有效性[J]. 周灿美. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版). 2015(03)
[10]文化维度理论与文化智力理论——跨文化管理的“双股剑”[J]. 冯敏,马海兵,宋彩萍. 上海对外经贸大学学报. 2015(02)
本文编号:3503904
【文章来源】:山东大学山东省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校
【文章页数】:89 页
【学位级别】:硕士
【文章目录】:
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Objective of the Study
1.3 Significance of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Apology Strategies
2.1.1 Definition of apology strategies
2.1.2 Classification of apology strategies
2.1.3 Previous Studies of apology strategies
2.2 Cultural Dimensions
2.2.1 Development of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.2.2 Summary of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.2.3 Previous Studies of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory
2.3 Research Gaps and Research Questions
2.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
3.1 Sources of Data
3.2 Data Selection
3.3 Data Processing and Analysis
3.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Four Research Results
4.1 Overall Comparison of Apology Strategy Use in Home with Kids and Modern Family
4.2 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Gender
4.2.1 Strategies used by Chinese males and females
4.2.2 Strategies used by American males and females
4.2.3 Strategies used by different genders in the two countries
4.3 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Generations
4.3.1 Strategies used by different generations in Chinese
4.3.2 Strategies used by different generations in English
4.3.3 Strategies used by different generations in the two countries
Chapter Five Discussions about the Possible Reasons for Research Results
5.1 Overall Comparison of Apology Strategy Use in Home with Kids and Modern Family
5.2 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Gender
5.2.1 Strategies used by Chinese males and females
5.2.2 Strategies used by American males and females
5.2.3 Strategies used by different genders in the two countries
5.3 Comparison of Apology Strategies Based on Generations
5.3.1 Strategies used by different generations in Chinese
5.3.2 Strategies used by different generations in English
5.3.3 Strategies used by different generations in the two countries
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings of this Study
6.2 Implications
6.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study
References
Acknowledgements
学位论文评阅及答辩情况表
【参考文献】:
期刊论文
[1]近十年国际跨文化传播研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 史兴松,徐文娟,单晓晖. 全球传媒学刊. 2019(04)
[2]基于语料库探讨中国企业英文网站的跨文化适应水平[J]. 史兴松,单晓晖. 中国外语. 2019(02)
[3]当代中国礼貌观的地域差异研究——以致歉行为为例[J]. 邓兆红,邱佳. 外语研究. 2019(01)
[4]霍夫斯泰德文化维度理论在中国跨文化传播研究中的应用[J]. 马兴祥,王欣芳. 当代传播. 2018(06)
[5]基于文化维度理论的留学生跨文化适应性研究——以留学德国半年以上的77名中国学生为例[J]. 谢琼,戚一娇. 北京第二外国语学院学报. 2018(05)
[6]中美政治道歉言语行为对比研究[J]. 刘风光,邓耀臣,肇迎如. 外语与外语教学. 2016(06)
[7]显性教学对高中英语学习者语用能力发展的实证研究[J]. 杨昆,毛延生. 教学与管理. 2016(27)
[8]《论语》的文化维度与翻译策略[J]. 范敏. 天津外国语大学学报. 2015(05)
[9]课堂引导提高英语道歉策略运用能力的有效性[J]. 周灿美. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版). 2015(03)
[10]文化维度理论与文化智力理论——跨文化管理的“双股剑”[J]. 冯敏,马海兵,宋彩萍. 上海对外经贸大学学报. 2015(02)
本文编号:3503904
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/3503904.html