流弊与突围:“日语语言文学”学科的名与实

发布时间：2018-01-26 21:26

本文关键词： 日语语言文学危机学科史日本学　出处：《探索与争鸣》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："日语语言文学"已成为一个失效的学科命名,其学科限定不仅与战后国际政治秩序和语言生活的现实情况相悖,也与日本的语言文学在中国的阅读、教育、接受的历史与现状,与学科内部从业者的研究方向,与全球国别研究、区域研究的整体学术走向等都已严重脱节,甚至与全球教育、学术发展的大势相背驰。学科的"名"与"实"已严重错位,乖离。我们应打破现有的学科框架,破除"部落文化"带来的隔绝和封闭,以更具涵盖力的"日本学""、东亚学"等名之,这就要求教育管理部门以更为包容、开放的心态淡化"领地"划界意识,增进学科交叉、融通,从而保持"日本学"内部必要的张力和生长性。
[Abstract]:"Japanese language Literature" has become a invalid subject name. Its discipline limitation is not only contrary to the postwar international political order and the reality of language life, but also with the reading and education of Japanese language literature in China. The history and present situation of the acceptance, the research direction of the practitioners within the discipline, the global country study, the overall academic trend of the regional research, etc., have all been seriously disconnected with the global education. The general trend of academic development is opposite. The "name" and "reality" of the discipline have been seriously misplaced, so we should break the existing disciplinary framework and break the isolation and closure brought about by "tribal culture". In the name of "Japanese study" and "East Asian Studies", which are more comprehensive, this requires the educational management departments to desalinate the consciousness of "territorial demarcation" with a more inclusive and open mind, and to promote the interdisciplinary and integration of subjects. In order to maintain the necessary internal tension and growth of Japanese Studies.
【作者单位】：复旦大学外文学院;吉林华侨外国语学院日语系;东北师范大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘东方学’体系建构与中国的‘东方学’研究”(14ZDB083)之子课题“中国‘东方学’中的日本及东亚研究”
【分类号】：H36
【正文快照】： 1907年,欧文·白璧德(1865—1933)曾敏锐地指CSSCI来源期刊做了详尽的统计后发现,日本语言学出,“赫伯特·斯宾塞曾在《论教育》中带着真正的预和日本文学类论文呈下降态势。[2]由此可见,在所谓言精神宣告科学将日渐战胜艺术与文学。……确学术导向的“象牙塔式教育”和就业导

【相似文献】