论人格标识在商业利用中的保护
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the prosperity of commerce, more and more enterprises and businesses apply the portraits, names and other personality logos of these famous people to the advertisements and packaging of commodities by obtaining the permission of some famous people. Used to promote their goods or services in order to attract more consumers to achieve greater economic benefits. On the other hand, there are a large number of cases of unauthorized use of the names or portraits of others for commercial purposes in judicial practice. When dealing with this kind of cases, the court in our country, whether from the nature of the case to the judgment of damages, there are some disputes, the same case will appear different court trial results. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a thorough study on the behavior of using the personality logo for commercial use and the act of improper commercial use of the personality mark, that is, the tort act, and to analyze the deep legal problems contained therein. In order to establish a reasonable legal system to regulate unauthorized use of other people's identity infringement. This paper takes the legal problems involved in the commercial use of personality identification as the research object, mainly using case analysis, conceptual analysis and comparative analysis, combined with three typical cases in China, to draw lessons from the existing research results of domestic and foreign scholars. This paper analyzes several important or controversial issues involved in the commercial use of personality logo, and puts forward a relief scheme for the infringement in the commercial use of personality logo. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders in a fair and reasonable manner. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an introduction. By analyzing three typical cases, the author puts forward several questions: 1, which are mainly discussed in this paper. What is the legal nature of applying personality identification to the behavior of commercial activities (authorized permission)? Can it be explained that the content of economic interests in personality rights, such as personal identity, names, portraits and other personality signs are forcibly used by others for commercial use, what rights infringes on the rights of the obligee? How to remedy this improper use of other people's identity for commercial activities? What is the calculation method of damages? 3, how to protect the personal remains of the deceased? What is the legal basis? The second chapter mainly summarizes the personality right and personality mark. From many different theories, this paper clarifies the concept, connotation and object of personality right, and defines the concept of personality identity. The third chapter mainly analyzes the legal relationship of legitimate commercial use (authorization) of personality identification, in order to solve the first problem raised in the introduction, in addition, This chapter classifies and defines the personality mark which can be used by business, and expounds the connotation and content of the commercial use of personality mark. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the method and system design of the legal regulation of the commercial use of personality mark (illegal improper use). Combined with the theory of public rights in the United States and general personality rights in Germany, this chapter analyzes the nature of the behavior of improper use of the personality identification of others for commercial activities and the nature of the rights infringed by the right holders, and expounds the reasons for the relief in what way. To solve the second question raised in the introduction. In addition, this chapter analyzes and expounds the behavior of violating the personal remains of the deceased, and puts forward some suggestions on how to construct the protection mechanism for the personal remains of the deceased.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜爱霞;;从媒体侵权纠纷看媒体侵权立法[J];中国报业;2011年10期
2 王康;;从生活事实到一般人格利益的法解释学基础——以“冒名上学”案中侵害客体的界定为分析对象[J];北方法学;2011年04期
3 梁志文;;著作人格权保护制度的误解与真相[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
4 顾乾坤;;历史维度下之法国、德国人格权民法保护模式探析[J];武汉公安干部学院学报;2011年02期
5 俞里江;;司法实践中媒体侵权基本抗辩事由分析——以北京市朝阳法院的实践为样本[J];法学杂志;2011年08期
6 朱云霞;;形象权的法律保护问题探微[J];郧阳师范高等专科学校学报;2011年04期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 张源泉;;德国之信息自决权[A];第四届全国公法学博士生论坛论文集[C];2009年
2 苏雁;李秀雅;贾静;张树兴;;关于我国民法典立法中环境问题的几点思考[A];资源节约型、环境友好型社会建设与环境资源法的热点问题研究——2006年全国环境资源法学研讨会论文集(一)[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 曾祥素;人格权案件将出现三点新变化[N];中国质量报;2010年
2 祝建军 广东省深圳市中级人民法院;人格商品化的法律保护模式[N];人民法院报;2010年
3 王晓雁;确立个人信息财产权属性[N];商务时报;2008年
4 王晓雁;垃圾短信泛滥,,个人信息安全如何保障?[N];天津政法报;2008年
5 见习记者 海燕;民航黑名单考量公民人格权保护力度[N];中国商报;2009年
6 姚海放;民法复习:老树枝头开新花[N];检察日报;2006年
7 王晓雁;专家建议立法确立个人信息的财产权属性[N];法制日报;2008年
8 铜山县检察院 董茜;人格权立法初探[N];江苏法制报;2008年
9 金文 李秀梅;此举可能构成人格尊严侵权[N];中国妇女报;2002年
10 杨立新;从两篇案件报道看新闻法治[N];检察日报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 严城;论人格权的衍生利益[D];黑龙江大学;2010年
2 姜新东;人格权的理念与制度构建[D];山东大学;2012年
3 陈龙江;人格标志上经济利益的民法保护[D];中国政法大学;2007年
4 匡敦校;大众传播侵害人格权研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年
5 王琳琳;论私权及其体系化[D];吉林大学;2012年
6 简海燕;媒体报道司法活动的法律限制[D];中国政法大学;2006年
7 范存生;转型期体育人力资本产权制度创新研究[D];辽宁大学;2007年
8 霍银泉;一般人格权研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
9 杨金丹;网络隐私权的私法保护[D];吉林大学;2010年
10 刘娟;人格尊严及其实现[D];河北师范大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王建伟;论真实人物形象权的法律保护[D];西南大学;2010年
2 梁波;人格权商品化的研究[D];广西师范大学;2011年
3 马霞;我国人格权商品化法律保护研究[D];兰州大学;2012年
4 郑星;人格权的商品化研究[D];浙江师范大学;2010年
5 王岷;从比较法角度看人格标识商品化的法律保护[D];兰州大学;2010年
6 岳妍妍;论人格标识在商业利用中的保护[D];华东政法大学;2011年
7 雷瑟琴;论人格权商品化的法律保护[D];暨南大学;2010年
8 莫观培;人格标识财产权的保护[D];暨南大学;2010年
9 陈茜;我国人格权商品化法律保护模式研究[D];西北大学;2011年
10 王长顺;论人格权财产利益及其民法保护[D];沈阳师范大学;2010年
本文编号:2230013
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/guanggaoshejilunwen/2230013.html