外交部发言人应答话语的语用论辩研究:以刘为民就中美稀土贸易摩擦答记者问为例

发布时间：2018-03-12 22:51

本文选题：外交部发言人　切入点：例行记者会　出处：《国际新闻界》2015年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文借助语用论辩学的研究框架,从论辩角度分析和评价了外交部前发言人刘为民对中美稀土贸易摩擦问题的应答,以此探讨外交部发言人应答话语的语用论辩研究路径。该路径由论辩话语重构、策略操控分析和批判性评价三个有机相连的研究环节组成。研究结果显示,为在合理性范围内使论辩结果对自己更为有利,刘为民在其应答的冲中突、开始、论辩和结束四个批判性讨论阶段均实施了策略操控。这些策略操控突出体现于刘为民在界定意见分歧、选取共同出发点、设计论证组成以及明确结论时对潜在话题、受众需求和表达方式三个方面的运筹帷幄。对照语用论辩学中的批判性讨论规则,结合中美稀土贸易摩擦的相关案件背景可以发现,刘为民对征兆型和因果型论证图式的把握尚有一定不足。个案分析表明,对外交部发言人应答话语的分析和评价必须有机融合论辩合理性和修辞有效性两个理论视角。
[Abstract]:Based on the framework of pragmatic argumentation, this paper analyzes and evaluates the response of former Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin to the Sino-American rare earth trade friction from the perspective of debate. This paper discusses the pragmatic debate research path of Foreign Ministry spokesman's Responsive discourse, which consists of three links: argumentative discourse reconstruction, strategic manipulation analysis and critical evaluation. In order to make the outcome of the argument more favorable to himself within the scope of rationality, Liu Weimin burst into his response and began, During the four critical stages of the debate and the end of the critical discussion, strategic manipulation was carried out. These manipulations were reflected in Liu Weimin's potential topics in defining differences of opinion, selecting common starting points, designing the composition of the argument, and making clear the conclusions. Comparing with the critical discussion rules in pragmatic argumentation, combining with the relevant case background of Sino-US rare earth trade friction, we can find that, Liu Weimin's understanding of the schemata of omen and causality is still insufficient. The case study shows that the analysis and evaluation of the foreign ministry spokesman's response discourse must combine the theoretical perspectives of argumentation rationality and rhetorical validity.
【作者单位】：江苏大学外国语学院文化话语研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“中美贸易摩擦论辩话语研究”(14CYY053)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：H15;G219.2

【参考文献】