不同放牧管理模式对高寒草甸植被、土壤和碳氮储量特征的影响
[Abstract]:The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is not only an important characteristic animal husbandry base in China, but also has an important impact on the climate of the northern hemisphere. It is also the birthplace of many mother rivers in China and its surrounding countries. It has a great impact on the ecological environment and social economy in the eastern and southwestern parts of China. Major grasslands and alpine grasslands play an important role in climate regulation, diversity protection and soil and water conservation. They also play an important role in the balance of carbon pools in regional ecosystems. At present, Alpine Grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is usually grazed continuously throughout the whole season, even throughout the year. Overgrazing is serious. This unreasonable use of alpine grassland has caused great damage to the grassland, especially during the period of grass turning green, the seedlings just germinating and turning green are picked. The photosynthetic area of alpine meadow decreased rapidly after grazing, which seriously affected the growth and development of grassland in the later period.The determination of reasonable grazing period is an important means to realize the recuperation, maintain the healthy development and sustainable utilization of grassland.However, under different grazing management modes, the structure and composition of alpine meadow vegetation, soil physicochemical characteristics and carbon and nitrogen storage characteristics. In this study, alpine meadows with four different grazing management modes (NG, RG, TG and CG) were selected as the research objects. Based on the principles of community ecology, different grazing management modes were studied through field investigation and indoor analysis. The effects of different grazing management on alpine meadow ecosystem were clarified. On this basis, the best grazing management model suitable for the region was explored, which provided theoretical basis for carbon sink management of alpine meadow, degradation and restoration of natural grassland. Compared with CG treatment, NG and RG treatment significantly increased the important values of Elymus nutans and Poa crymophila, the plant height of functional groups (Gramineae, Cyperaceae, Leguminosae and Weeds), the density and biomass of Gramineae plants, and the total aboveground and underground biomass, of which NG was the most effective. In order to reduce the important value of weeds, the ratio of underground and aboveground biomass, the biomass and density of weeds, the order of Shannon-Wiener index (H), Pielou evenness index (J), richness index (S) and total community density in four grazing patterns were: CGNGTGRG.2. Compared with CG treatment, NG and RG improved alpine meadow 0. The physical structure of ~20 cm soil decreased soil compactness, but had little effect on deep soil; NG and RG improved water holding capacity of alpine meadow soil to some extent. NG significantly increased soil organic matter content of 0~30 cm, RG and TG significantly increased soil organic matter content of 0~20 cm. NG, RG and TG significantly increased total soil organic matter content of 0~30 cm in alpine meadow soil. NG, RG and TG significantly increased soil total phosphorus and available phosphorus content in 0-30 cm alpine meadow. Different grazing patterns had no significant effect on total potassium content in alpine meadow soil, but in general, NG, RG and TG were higher than CG, RG and TG were lower than CG, RG and TG in 0-10 cm soil layer. The monthly dynamics of soil respiration rate in alpine meadow showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, and the peak value appeared in August. In the whole growing season, the average soil respiration value of NG, RG and TG in alpine meadow was significantly higher than that of CG plot, and there was no significant difference between NG and RG, but significantly higher than that of TG. There was a threshold value of soil water content on soil respiration flux, about 30% was the critical value, before which there was a positive correlation between them, and after that there was a negative correlation between them.4.NG, RG and TG significantly increased soil, root, vegetation and litter organic carbon, nitrogen storage than CG. In alpine meadow ecosystem, soil organic carbon storage accounted for the largest proportion (88.8% - 98%). 2%, followed by root system (1.6% - 8.7%), vegetation (0.17% - 1.43%) and litter (0.022% - 0.97%); soil organic carbon (97.3% - 99.6%) accounted for the largest proportion of nitrogen storage, followed by root system (0.32% - 2.07%), vegetation (0.05% - 0.44%) and litter (0.003% - 0.16%). Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage were mainly distributed in 0-40 cm soil layer. At the same time, grazing tended to make organic carbon and nitrogen transfer to deeper layer. NG, RG and TG increased significantly. The total organic carbon and nitrogen reserves of the cold meadow ecosystem were significantly reduced by CG, which led to the loss of organic carbon and nitrogen. In conclusion, grazing prohibition and rest in the whole growing season could effectively restore the degraded grassland ecosystem in the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Rest grazing can make full use of grassland resources, which is conducive to ecological restoration and sustainable development of grassland. It is an ideal choice for grazing management of alpine meadow grassland in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S812.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李英年,周华坤,沈振西;高寒草甸牧草产量形成过程及与气象因子的关联分析[J];草地学报;2001年03期
2 姚德良,张强,沈振西,谢正桐;高寒草甸小气候考察研究[J];草地学报;2003年04期
3 王慧春;赵修堂;王启兰;;青海高寒草甸不同植被土壤微生物生物量的测定[J];青海草业;2006年04期
4 吴世仁;马玉秀;;甘南州高寒草甸草原昆虫区系调查简报[J];甘肃农业;2008年02期
5 梁东营;林丽;李以康;王溪;曹广民;;三江源退化高寒草甸草毡表层剥蚀过程及发生机理的初步研究[J];草地学报;2010年01期
6 范晓梅;刘光生;王一博;任东兴;王根绪;;长江源区高寒草甸植被覆盖变化对蒸散过程的影响[J];水土保持通报;2010年06期
7 罗亚勇;张宇;张静辉;卡召加;尚伦宇;王少影;;不同退化阶段高寒草甸土壤化学计量特征[J];生态学杂志;2012年02期
8 张裴雷;方华军;程淑兰;徐敏杰;李林森;党旭升;;增氮对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸土壤甲烷吸收的早期影响[J];生态学报;2013年13期
9 虎彪;;金川县高寒草甸植被的特征及其利用途径的初步探讨[J];中国牦牛;1985年04期
10 刘海原;;玉树地区高寒草甸的类型及其利用价值[J];青海畜牧兽医杂志;1988年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 曹广民;杜岩功;梁东营;王长庭;王启兰;;高寒草甸两种类型植物对甲烷汇的影响[A];青藏高原资源·环境·生态建设学术研讨会暨中国青藏高原研究会2007学术年会论文摘要汇编[C];2007年
2 李月梅;曹广民;;土地利用方式改变对高寒草甸土壤有机碳的影响的初步研究[A];2005青藏高原环境与变化研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2005年
3 王秀红;郑度;;青藏高原高寒草甸资源的可持续利用[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(上册)[C];1999年
4 王文颖;;高寒草甸土地退化及其恢复重建对植被碳氮含量的影响[A];第三届全国植物生态学前沿论坛第三届全国克隆植物生态学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2009年
5 张力;刘彩琴;郑中朝;周学辉;肖西山;焦婷;冯瑞林;李伟;苗小林;;青海三角城种羊场高寒草甸草场氮、硫的季节变化及其盈缺分析[A];全国养羊生产与学术研讨会议论文集(2003~2004)[C];2004年
6 姚德良;张强;谢正桐;;高寒草甸陆气水热交换数值模拟研究[A];第十七届全国水动力学研讨会暨第六届全国水动力学学术会议文集[C];2003年
7 孙飞达;龙瑞军;;鼠类活动对三江源区高寒草甸初级生产力的影响[A];2009中国草原发展论坛论文集[C];2009年
8 陶贞;沈承德;孙彦敏;高全洲;易惟熙;李英年;;土地利用变化对高寒草甸土壤有机质更新的影响[A];中国地理学会2004年学术年会暨海峡两岸地理学术研讨会论文摘要集[C];2004年
9 李希来;张静;;青藏高原“黑土滩”形成的自然因素与生物学机制[A];草业与西部大开发——草业与西部大开发学术研讨会暨中国草原学会2000年学术年会论文集[C];2000年
10 孙平;赵新全;徐世晓;赵同标;赵伟;;冬季根田鼠(MICROTUS OECONOMUS)种群对实验增温响应的初步研究[A];野生动物生态与管理学术讨论会论文摘要集[C];2001年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 记者 张目 朱国亮;丰腴的青藏高寒草甸草枯畜减[N];新华每日电讯;2003年
2 陈建明;漫游伊犁草原[N];中国绿色时报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 毛琳;资源有效性对植物及其共生丛枝菌根真富群落的调控机制研究[D];兰州大学;2015年
2 苗福泓;青藏高原东北缘草地植物群落对放牧利用强度和降水变异的响应[D];兰州大学;2015年
3 芦晓飞;西藏米拉山高寒草甸土壤微生物多样性研究[D];中国农业科学院;2009年
4 王辉;玛曲高寒草甸沙化特征及沙化驱动机制研究[D];兰州大学;2007年
5 张世虎;青藏高原东部高寒草甸土壤氮的矿化和硝化及地上地下关系的研究[D];兰州大学;2011年
6 章志龙;氮素添加对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸植物群落花期物候和群落结构的影响[D];兰州大学;2013年
7 刘佳佳;青藏高原高寒草甸草本植物的空间格局及其形成机制[D];兰州大学;2012年
8 文淑均;青藏高原东缘高寒草甸种子雨研究[D];兰州大学;2012年
9 刘e,
本文编号:2223269
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2223269.html